Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green hydrogen: the crucial performance of electrolysers fed by variable and intermittent renewable electricity

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After a short review of past and present EU green energy programmes, the article deals with the great surging interest on green hydrogen worldwide and the consequent programme of the EU. Considering the trend in the increasing percentage of variable wind and solar plants in the EU, a preliminary evidence on their variability is reported and based on their capacity factors during the different months of last year in France, Spain and Italy. The basic characteristics and ‘colours’ of hydrogen are underlined, and emphasis is placed on the current and future global demand in 2030 and 2050. The expected cost of the energy content of green hydrogen just at the exit of electrolysers (power to gas—P2G) fed by renewable electricity as derived by key international well-recognised organisations is presented. The high cost of hydrogen content of energy at the exit of electrolysers is underlined; even with the 2050 prospective low cost around €1.2/kg of hydrogen, it corresponds to €36/MWh to be compared with the EU present gas market price of €13/MWh that with a penalisation of around €130/t CO2 will reach €36/MWh. Even if the compression, transport and distribution of hydrogen pose important challenges, the article is limited to its production subject to the effects of variability of wind and solar on the performance of large electrolysis plants characterised by a complex balance of plant composed of various subsystems. Based on almost instantaneous data logging from some Italian wind and solar plants, questions are raised about the effects of variability and intermittency on efficiency, flexibility, reduction of the load factor of the electrolyser for its inherent limits. This is relevant due to its minimum load for operation, frequent cold starts, time to ramp up to the operating power. This leads to concerns on the feasibility of operation of an electrolyser plant if it is fed only by a variable and intermittent renewable dedicated plant not connected to the network. Owing to the specific variation versus time of the renewable electricity feeding the electrolyser and of the constraints of hydrogen demand, the cost of hydrogen provided in the literature is only valid for general scenarios. A tailor-made approach case by case for the optimisation and design of the plant appears to be necessary. In contrast the possible smooth behaviour of an electrolyser connected to the grid with power purchasing agreements for electricity from renewable plants spread in the system is analysed; the existing regulations foresee increments in the price of this electricity to remunerate its transport and for ancillary, thus increasing the hydrogen production cost. On the other hand, a better capacity factor could ameliorate the situation but also in this case detailed optimisations are needed. In the conclusions, the still great technological, legal, regulatory and socio-economic challenges for hydrogen production, transport, distribution and final uses are pointed out with the necessity of rigorous analyses and prototypal experiments for a better definition of its market share and relevant timing; specifically it is suggested to concentrate efforts also on a possible new way of operation of electrolysers not as up to now connected to a strong electricity network but fed by RES plants isolated from the grid and characterised by daily, monthly and seasonal variations with time intervals of total lack of electricity at all and sharp up-and-down ramps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: IRENA 2019 based on IEA data [4]

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript has associated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: The data of Table 1 are provided by Eurostat https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/database. The data on the capacity factors have been calculated from the data set provided by Terna, RDF, REE. The data on the wind and solar plant in South Italy were kindly supplied by the owner of the plant with the restriction not to disclose nor the detail nor the location of the plant.]

Notes

  1. We use capacity factor for units producing energy and load factor for those using energy.

  2. For example, the electricity generation varies with the cube of the wind speed; therefore, even if there is wind, the electricity generation can sometimes be very low.

  3. CAPEX, capital expenditure.

  4. O&M, operation and maintenance cost.

Reference

  1. European Commission Communication. The European Green Deal COM/2019/640 Final (2019)

  2. European Commission Communication. A Hydrogen Strategy for a Climate-Neutral Europe COM/2020/301 Final (2020)

  3. European Commission Communication. An EU Strategy to Harness the Potential of Offshore Renewable Energy for a Climate Neutral Future, COM(2020) 741 Final (2020)

  4. IRENA. Hydrogen: A Renewable Energy Perspective, Abu Dhabi (2019). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Sep/IRENA_Hydrogen_2019.pdf

  5. IEA. The Future of Hydrogen (2019). https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen

  6. Asami Miketa, IRENA: "Hydrogen from Renewable Power Technology Outlook for the Energy Transition” - Paper presented at the “Hydrogen: Bridging Sectors and Regions” event in Abu Dhabi 20 September 2019 during 24th World Energy Congress

  7. Bloomberg NEF. Hydrogen Economy Outlook. Key Messages (2020)

  8. European Commission. Speech by President von der Leyen to the Hydrogen Council, Press Corner (2021). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_21_158

  9. Fuel cells and hydrogen joint undertaking. https://www.H2v.eu

  10. Directive 2018/200 of 11 December 2018, on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable source (recast), OJ L 328/82

  11. IRENA. Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.50C Climate Goal, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi (2020)

  12. S. Bruce, M. Temminghoff, J. Hayward, E. Schmidt, C. Munnings, D. Palfreyman, P. Hartley, National Hydrogen Roadmap (CSIRO, Canberra, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. STORE & GO project. Horizon 2020 Final Report (2020)

  14. WEC report “Variable Renewables Integration in Electrical Systems: how to get it right” coordinated by A.Clerici-2016-www worldenery org

  15. Samuel Furfari, The hydrogen illusion, KDP, IBSN 9798693059931

  16. European Commission Communication, Clean Energy For All Europeans, COM/2016/0860 final

  17. European Council Conclusion ‘Towards a hydrogen market for Europe’, 11 December 2020

  18. Directive 2018/2001 of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Furfari.

Additional information

We opted to use variability and intermittency despite that this last word is commonly used. In English, intermittent gives more the idea of an on–off behaviour than variable which expresses more changes over time. Wind and solar energy are both variable and intermittent as we will see with detail.

In this paper when solar is mentioned, it is understood that it means solar photovoltaic.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furfari, S., Clerici, A. Green hydrogen: the crucial performance of electrolysers fed by variable and intermittent renewable electricity. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 509 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01445-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01445-5

Navigation