Abstract
The concept of compulsory heterosexuality was initially developed by lesbian feminists and gay liberationists in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Compulsory heterosexuality proved to be a major conceptual innovation because it made possible a structural sociology of sexuality. The center of analysis shifted from the individual homosexual and from individual acts of discrimination to the institutional enforcement of normative heterosexuality and its consequences for nonheterosexuals. This essay provides a critical analysis of this concept as it has been elaborated from the late 1960s to the present. The author outlines the analytical and historical limits of the critique of compulsory heterosexuality without abandoning a notion of the institutionalization of normative heterosexuality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bawer, B. (1993).A place at the table. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bech, H. (2007). The disappearance of the homosexual. In S. Seidman, C. Meeks, & N. Fischer (Eds.),Introducing the new sexuality studies (pp. 151–157). New York: Routledge.
Brown, R. M. (1975). The shape of things to come. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.),Lesbianism and the women’s movement (pp. 69–78). Baltimore: Diana Press.
Bunch, C. (1975). Lesbians in revolt. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.),Lesbianism and the women’s movement (pp. 29–38). Baltimore: Diana Press.
Butler, J. (1989).Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1994). Against improper objects.Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6(2/3), 1–26.
Byron, S. (1992). The closet syndrome. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 58–65). New York: New York University Press. (original work published 1972)
Eskridge, W., Jr. (1999).Gaylaw. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Furies Collective. (1975). Introduction. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.),Lesbianism and the women’s movement (pp. 9–13). Baltimore: Diana Press.
Fuss, D. (1991). Introduction. In D. Fuss (Ed.),Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge.
Fuss, D. (1995).Identification papers. New York: Routledge.
Gamson, J. (2002). Sweating in the spotlight: Lesbian, gay, and queer encounters with media and popular culture. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Eds.),Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 339–354). London: Sage.
Gay Liberation Front [Chicago]. (1992). Gay revolution and sex roles. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 252–258). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Gay Liberation Front Women [New York City]. (1992). Lesbians and the ultimate liberation of women. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 201–205). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Halberstam, J. (1998).Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hale, C. J. (2003). Leatherdyke boys and their daddies: How to have sex without women or men. In R. Corber & S. Valocchi (Eds.),Queer studies (pp. 61–72). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
Halperin, D. (1995). The queer politics of Michel Foucault. In D. Halperin,Saint Foucault: Towards a gay hagiography (pp. 15–124). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ingraham, C. (1996). The heterosexual imaginary. In S. Seidman (Ed.),Queer theory/sociology (pp. 168–193). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Ingraham, C. (1999).White weddings. New York: Routledge.
Jackson, S. (2006). Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality.Feminist Theory, 7, 105–121.
Johnson, D. (2004).The lavender scare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Purple September Staff. (1975). The normative status of heterosexuality. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.),Lesbianism and the women’s movement (pp. 79–84). Baltimore: Diana Press.
Radicalesbians. (1992). The woman-identified-woman. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 172–176). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Raeburn, N. (2004).Changing corporate America from inside out. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Renold, E. (2006). “They won’t let us play...unless you’re going out with one of them”: Girls, boys and Butler’s “heterosexual matrix” in the primary years.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 489–509.
Rich, A. (1993). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. In H. Abelove, M. Barala, & D. Halperin (Eds.),The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 227–254). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1978)
Richardson, D. (1996). Heterosexuality and social theory. In D. Richardson (Ed.),Theorizing heterosexuality (pp. 1–21). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Roseneil, S. (2002). The heterosexual/homosexual binary: Past, present and future. In D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Eds.),Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 27–44). London: Sage.
Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical critique of sexuality. In C. Vance (Ed.),Pleasure and danger (pp. 267–319). New York: Routledge.
Sedgwick, E. K. (1990).Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Seidman, S. (2003).Beyond the closet. New York: Routledge.
Seidman, S., & Meeks, C. (2008). Politik der Befreiung, Kulturen der Anpassung: Die Suche nach Authentizität in der amerikanischen Homosexual-lenbewegung [Politics of emancipation, cultures of conformity: The search for authenticity in the American homosexual movement]. In N. Pethes & S. Schicktanz (Eds.),Sexualität als Experiment: Identität, Lust und Reproduktion zwischen science und fiction (pp. 78–97). Frankfurt, Germany: Verlag.
Shelley, M. (1992). Gay is good. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 31–33). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Small, M. (1975). Lesbians and the class position of women. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.),Lesbianism and the women’s movement (pp. 49–62). Baltimore: Diana Press.
Smith, A. M. (1997). The good homosexual and the dangerous queer: Resisting the “new homophobia.” In L. Segal (Ed.),New sexual agendas (pp. 214–231). London: Macmillan.
Solomon, B. (1975). Taking the bullshit by the horns. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.),Lesbianism and the women’s movement (pp. 39–48). Baltimore: Diana Press.
Stryker, S., & White, S. (2006).The transgender studies reader. New York: Routledge.
Sullivan, A. (1996).Virtually normal. New York: Vintage.
Third World Gay Revolution [Chicago] & Gay Liberation Front [Chicago]. (1992). Gay revolution and sex roles. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 252–258). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Third World Gay Revolution [New York City]. (1992).What we want, what we believe. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 363–367). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Walters, S. (2001).All the rage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiegman, R. (2006). Heteronormativity and the desire for gender.Feminist Theory, 7, 89–103.
Wittig, M. (1992).The straight mind and other essays. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1980)
Wittman, C. (1992). A gay manifesto. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 330–341). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Young, A. (1992). Out of the closets, into the streets. In K. Jay & A. Young (Eds.),Out of the closets: Voices of gay liberation (pp. 6–30). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seidman, S. Critique of compulsory heterosexuality. Sex Res Soc Policy 6, 18–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.18
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.18