Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The need to prioritize research, policy, and practice to address the overdose epidemic in smaller settings in Canada

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The majority of research and policy directives targeting opioid use and overdose prevention are based in larger urban settings and not easily adaptable to smaller Canadian settings (i.e., small- to mid-sized cities and rural areas). We identify a variety of research and policy gaps in smaller settings, including limited access to supervised consumption services, safer supply and novel opioid agonist therapy programs, as well as housing-based services and supports. Additionally, we identify the need for novel strategies to improve healthcare access and health outcomes in a more equitable way for people who use drugs, including virtual opioid agonist therapy clinics, episodic overdose prevention services, and housing-based harm reduction programs that are better suited for smaller settings. These programs should be coupled with rigorous evaluation, in order to understand the unique factors that shape overdose risk, opioid use, and service uptake in smaller Canadian settings.

Résumé

La recherche et les politiques d’orientation axées sur l’usage des opioïdes et la prévention des surdoses sont majoritairement basées dans les grandes agglomérations urbaines et ne sont donc pas faciles à adapter aux petites agglomérations du Canada (c.-à-d. aux villes petites et moyennes et aux agglomérations en milieu rural). Nous définissons plusieurs des lacunes de la recherche et des politiques dans les petites agglomérations, dont l’accès limité aux services de consommation supervisée, à l’approvisionnement sûr et aux nouveaux programmes de traitement par agonistes opioïdes, ainsi qu’aux services et aux mesures d’aide fondés sur le logement. Nous définissons aussi le besoin de stratégies novatrices pour améliorer l’accès aux soins de santé et les résultats cliniques de façon plus équitable pour les personnes qui font usage de drogue, notamment le besoin de cliniques virtuelles de traitement par agonistes opioïdes, de services épisodiques de prévention des surdoses et de programmes de réduction des méfaits fondés sur le logement, mieux adaptés aux petites agglomérations. De tels programmes devraient être assortis d’une évaluation rigoureuse pour mettre en lumière les facteurs particuliers qui influencent le risque de surdose, l’usage des opioïdes et le recours aux services dans les petites agglomérations canadiennes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

N/A.

Code availability

N/A.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the US National Institutes of Health (R01DA044181). Geoff Bardwell is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GB wrote the first draft. Both authors made substantial contributions to the work, approved the final version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Bardwell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

N/A.

Consent to participate

N/A.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bardwell, G., Lappalainen, L. The need to prioritize research, policy, and practice to address the overdose epidemic in smaller settings in Canada. Can J Public Health 112, 733–736 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00504-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00504-9

Keywords

Mots-clés

Navigation