Skip to main content
Log in

On a Time Dependent Divergence Measure between Two Residual Lifetime Distributions

  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, a time-dependent measure of divergence has been introduced by Mansourvar and Asadi (2020) to assess the discrepancy between the survival functions of two residual lifetime random variables. In this paper, we derive various time-dependent results on the proposed divergence measure in connection to other well-known measures in reliability engineering. The proposed criterion is also examined in mixture models and a general class of survival transformation models which results in some well-known models in the lifetime studies and survival analysis. In addition, the time-dependent measure is employed to evaluate the divergence between the lifetime distributions of \(k\)-out-of-\(n\) systems and also to assess the discrepancy between the distribution functions of the epoch times of a non-homogeneous Poisson process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. M. Ali and S. D. Silvey, ‘‘A general class of coefficients of divergence of one distribution from another,’’ J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 28 (1), 131–142 (1996).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B. C. Arnold, N. Balakrishnan, and H. N. Nagaraja, Records (Wiley, New York, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Banerjee, S. Merugu, I. S. Dhillon, and J. Ghosh, ‘‘Clustering with Bregman divergences,’’ J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6 (10), 1705–1749 (2005).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Basseville, ‘‘Divergence measures for statistical data processing-anannotated bibliography,’’ Signal Processing. 93 (4), 621–633 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. M. Bregman, ‘‘The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming,’’ USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 7 (3), 200–217 (1967).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Carota, G. Parmigiani, and N. G. Polson, ‘‘Diagnostic measures for model criticism,’’ J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91 (434), 753–762 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. H. Cha and J. Mi, ‘‘Some probability functions in reliability and their applications,’’ Nav. Res. Logist. 54 (2), 128–135 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. T. F. Cox and G. Czanner, ‘‘A practical divergence measure for survival distributions that can be estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves,’’ Stat. Med. 35 (14), 2406–2421 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. A. David and H. N. Nagaraja, Order Statistics, 3rd ed., Wiley, New Jersey, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Di Crescenzo and M. Longobardi, ‘‘A measure of discrimination between past lifetime distributions,’’ Stat. Probab. Lett. 67 (2), 173–182 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Ebrahimi and S. Kirmani, ‘‘A measure of discrimination between two residual life-time distributions and its applications,’’ Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 48 (2),257–265 (1996a).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Ebrahimi and S. Kirmani, ‘‘A characterisation of the proportional hazards model through a measure of discrimination between two residual life distributions,’’ Biometrika. 83 (1), 233–235 (1996b).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Fischer, ‘‘Quantization and clustering with Bregman divergences,’’ J. Multivar. Anal. 101 (9), 2207–2221 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R. C. Gupta and S. Kirmani, ‘‘Closure and monotonicity properties of nonhomogeneous poisson processes and record values,’’ Probab. Eng. Inf. Sci. 2 (4), 475–484 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, ‘‘On information and sufficiency,’’ Ann. Math. Stat. 22 (1), 79–86 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. C. D. Lai and M. Xie, Stochastic ageing and dependence for reliability, Springer Science and Business Media, 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. N. J. Lynn and N. D. Singpurwalla, ‘‘[Burn-in]: Comment: ‘‘burn-in’’ makes us feel good,’’ Stat. Sci. 12 (1), 13–19 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Mansourvar and M. Asadi, ‘‘An extension of the Cox-Czanner divergence measure to residual lifetime distributions with applications,’’ Statistics. 54 (6), 1311–1328 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. G. McLachlan and D. Peel, Finite Mixture Models Wiley, 2004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Misra, J. Francis, and S. Naqvi, ‘‘Some sufficient conditions for relative aging of life distributions,’’ Probab. Eng. Inf. Sci. 31 (1), 83–99 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Navarro, Y. del Águila, M. A. Sordo, and A. Suárez-Llorens, ‘‘Preservation of reliability classes under the formation of coherent systems,’’ Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 30 (4), 444–454 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Navarro, Y. Del Águila, M. A. Sordo, and A. Suárez-Llorens, ‘‘Preservation of stochastic orders under the formation of generalized distorted distributions. applications to coherent systems,’’ Methodol. Comput. Appl. 18 (2), 529–545 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Nielsen and R. Nock, ‘‘On the chi square and higher-order chi distances for approximating f-divergences,’’ IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 21 (1), 10–13 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Nikulin, ‘‘Hellinger distance,’’ hazewinkel, michiel, encyclopedia of mathematics,’’ Springer, Berlin, 2001. https://doi.org/10:1361684-1361686.

    Google Scholar 

  25. I. Sason and S. Verdu, ‘‘f-Divergence inequalities,’’ Trans. Inf. Theory 62 (11), 5973–6006 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Schlattmann, Medical Applications of Finite Mixture Models, Springer, 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Sengupta and J. V. Deshpande, ‘‘Some results on the relative ageing of two life distributions,’’ J. Appl. Probab. 31 (4), 991–1003 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Shaked and J. G. Shanthikumar, Stochastic orders, Springer Science and Business Media, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. G. C. Tiao and G. E. Box, ‘‘Some comments on ‘‘Bayes’’ estimators,’’ Am. Stat. 27 (1), 12–14 (1973).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. F. Vonta and A. Karagrigoriou, ‘‘Generalized measures of divergence in survival analysis and reliability,’’ J. Appl. Probab. 47 (1), 216–234 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Associate Editor and two reviewers for their constructive comments that greatly improved the paper.

Funding

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zahra Mansourvar or Majid Asadi.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansourvar, Z., Asadi, M. On a Time Dependent Divergence Measure between Two Residual Lifetime Distributions. Math. Meth. Stat. 29, 135–148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530720030023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530720030023

Keywords:

Navigation