Skip to main content

Failure of Bayesian Updating in Repeated Bilateral Bargaining

  • Conference paper
Experimental Business Research

Abstract

Ever since Camerer and Weigelt (1988) concluded in their important experimental work that “sequential equilibrium describes actual behavior well enough,” we might be tempted to use this theory confidently in various domains. To assess the robustness of the above conclusion, the present study attempts to explore Bayesian updating in a bilateral negotiated sale setup injected with a whiff of an ultimatum aroma. We conclude that the ultimatum nature of the basic game tends to overwhelm rational behavior on the part of the sellers and that buyers are not cognizant of favorable prices occurring later in the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Camerer, Colin and K. Weigelt, (1988). “Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation Model.” Econometrica, 56(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., (1968). “Conservatism in Human Information Processing,” in Formal Representation of Human Judgment, B. Kleinmuntz ed., John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze, (1982). “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 3867–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmuntz, B., (1968). Formal Representation of Human Judgment, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., and R. Wilson (1982). “Reputation and imperfect information.” Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ching Chyi, (2000). “Reputation in Repeated Bilateral Trading with Outside Alternatives.” Working Paper, The Chinese University of HK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H., (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, Rami and Ching Chyi Lee, (1999). “Bargaining and search: An experimental study.” Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(6), 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, C.C., Weg, E., Zwick, R. (2005). Failure of Bayesian Updating in Repeated Bilateral Bargaining. In: Rapoport, A., Zwick, R. (eds) Experimental Business Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24243-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics