Skip to main content

Abstract

Our task in this chapter is unique and thus extraordinarily challenging. The task is unique because unlike the remaining theory chapters, we consider a framework that has become virtually obsolete throughout general sociology (Coleman, 1990). Thirty years ago, structural-functionalism (or simply, functionalism) occupied a central place in family anthologies (McIntyre, 1966; Pitts, 1964). But in more recent collections, no one noticed or cared that it was omitted (Burr et al., 1979; Sus-sman & Steinmetz, 1987). Nevertheless, this book must address functionalism (1) because of its historic significance for studies of families, and (2) because functinalist assumptions remain central to family sociology and family studies, in spite of arguments to the contrary (Broderick, 1971a; Holman & Burr, 1980). To understand why functionalism was once considered important, then fell into disrepute, but continues to be significant for family research, we must first grasp what it was and is trying to say.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adriaansens, H. P. (1980). Talcott Parsons and the conceptual dilemma. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R. (1983). Divorce: Before, during, after. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 102–115). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R., & Rodgers, R. H. (1987). Divorced families: A multidisciplinary developmental view. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, J., & Klein, D. M. (1988). The linkages between family development and family stress. In D. M. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 3–15). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (Ed.) (1982). Theoretical logic in sociology, Vol. 4. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1985). Introduction. In J. C. Alexander (Ed.), Neo-Functionalism (pp. 7–18). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1988). Parsons’ “structure” in American sociology. Sociological Theory, 6(1), 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1990). Commentary: Structure, Value, Action. American Sociological Review, 55, 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L. (1982). The extramarital connection: Sex, intimacy, and identity. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R., & Slater, P. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. Bales (with J. Olds, M. Zelditch, Jr., & P. Slater) (Eds.), Family socialization and interaction process (pp. 259–306). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, G. L. (1986). The family: Preserving America’s future. Washington, DC: White House Working Group on the Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, W. R. (1989). Dynamics of stepsibling and half-sibling relationships. In W. R. Beer (Ed.), Relative strangers (pp. 112–134). Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1990). Resolving the contradiction of modernity and modernism, Part II. Society, 27, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N., & Vogel, E. (1960). A modern introduction to the family. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. (Revised 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. H., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. L., Swidler, S., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1981). The good-provider role: Its rise and fall. American Psychologist, 36, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1986). Psychological absence in the family: A systems approach to a study of fathering. In M. B. Sussman (Ed.), The Charbydis Complex (pp. 11–32). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1987). Family stress. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 695–724). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P., Caron, W., Horbal, J., & Mortimer, J. (1990). Predictors of depression in caregivers of demetia patients: Boundary ambiguity and mastery. Family Process, 29, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourricaud, F. (1981). The sociology of Talcott Parsons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C. B. (1971a). Beyond the five conceptual frameworks: A decade of development in family theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33(1), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C. B. (1971b). Sexism in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 345–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation. Demography, 26, 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W., Nye, F. I., Hill, R., & Reiss, I. (Eds.) (1979). Contemporary theories about the family, Vols. I, II. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., & van Driel, B. (1989). Variant lifestyles and relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilman, C. S., Nunnally, E. W., & Cox, M. (Eds.) (1988). Variant family forms. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. (Ed.) (1964). Handbook of marriage and the family. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. K. (1959). The study of social disorganization and deviant behavior. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom, & L. S. Cottrell, Jr. (Eds.), Sociology today: Problems and prospects (pp. 461–484). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Commentary: Social institutions and social theory. American Sociological Review, 55, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical sociology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1875). System of positive policy or treatise on sociology. London: Burt Franklin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumon, W. (1988). The meaning of family policy in western Europe and the United States. In D. M. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 234–245). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1956). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1962). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1985). Macro-societal analysis: Background, development and indications. In S. N. Eisenstadt & H. J. Helle (Eds.), Macrosociological theory I (pp. 7–24). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. P. (1971). The Hobbesian problem of order: A critical appraisal of the normative solution. American Sociological Review, 36, 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T. J. (1985). Marriage trends in America: Estimates, implications and underlying causes. Population and Development Review, 11, 193–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (1987). Effects of parental remarriage on children: An updated comparison of theories, methods, and findings from clinical and empirical research. In K. Palsey & M. Ihinger-Tallman (Eds.), Remarriage and stepparenting today: Research and theory (pp. 231–255). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1981). The sociology of deviance and social control. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 483–522). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). Agency, institution, and time-space analysis. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 161–174). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, D. D., & Scanzoni, J. (1989). Couple consensus during marital joint decision making: A context, process, outcome model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 943–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1959). The sociology of the family. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom, & L. S. Cottrell, Jr. (Eds), Sociology today (pp. 178–196). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1961). Illegitimacy, anomie, and cultural penetration. American Sociological Review, 26, 910–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1964). The family. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1990). What is family? Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, P. (1983). Talcott Parsons. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. A. (1988). Schooling, stress, and family development: Rethinking the social role metaphor. In D. M. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 44–78). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1949). Families under stress. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1982). American families during the twentieth century. In T. C. Caplow, H. M. Bahr, B. A. Chadwick, R. Hill, & M. H. Williamson (Eds.), Middletown families: Fifty years of change and continuity (pp. 271–321). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1983). [Foreword] In D. H. Olson et al. Families: What Makes Them Work? (pp. 7–10). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., & Hansen, D. (1960). The identification of conceptual frameworks utilized in family study. Marriage and Family living, 23, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. (1985). Children’s life course: Family structure and living arrangements in cohort perspective. In G. H. Elder (Ed), Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980 (pp. 75–112). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W., & Nye, F. I. (Eds.) (1963). The employed mother in America. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. J., Buehler, C., & Robinson, B. (1983). Single-parenting: Transitioning alone. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 116–132). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, T. B., & Burr, W. R. (1980). Beyond the beyond: The growth of family theories in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 729–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elemental forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. (1981). A social history of American family sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesser, C. J. (1975). Social theory revisited. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions of doing evil. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology: Towards a reconstruction of social theory and methodology. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macrosociologies (pp. 1–47). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. (1948). The engagement: Thinking about marriage. In H. Becker & R. Hill (Eds), Family, marriage and parenthood. Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. N., Carter, E. B., & Gormon, E. M. (1976). Simmers influence on American sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 813–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1930). Parenthood—The basis of social structure. In V. F. Calverton & S. D. Schmalhausen (Eds.), The new generation (pp. 18–40). New York: McCauley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, D. (1960). The nature and types of sociological theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, H. P. (1983). Societal stress: The black family. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 178–187). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. I., & Figley, C. R. (1983a). Introduction. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. xxi–xxxi). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. I., & Figley, C. R. (1983b). Bridging normative and catastrophic family stress. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 218–228). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, J. (1966). The structural—functional approach to family study. In F. Ivan Nye & F. M. Berardo (Eds.), Emerging conceptual frameworks in family analysis (pp. 52–77). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D. M. (1989). Stepfamilies in context. In W. R. Beer (Ed.), Relative strangers (pp. 1–28). Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S., & Kellogg, S. (1988). Domestic revolutions: A social history of American family life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1989). Social causes of psychological distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, J. (1988). Institutional consequences of hard times: Engagement in the 1930s. In D. Klein & J. Aldous (Eds.), Social stress and family development (pp. 175–192), New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, J. (1989). Into one’s own: From youth to adulthood in the United States, 1920–1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & McCubbin, H. (1983). Families: What makes them work? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, W. R. (1967). Divorce in the progressive era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, H. A. (Ed.) (1970). The family in search of a future. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1950). Psychoanalysis and the social structure. In T. Parsons (Ed), Essays in sociological theory (rev. ed., pp. 336–347). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1965). The normal American family. In S. Farber, P. Mustacchi, & R. Wilson (Eds.), Man and civilization: The family search for survival (pp. 31–50). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1982). Durkheim on organic solidarity. In L. H. Mayhew (Ed.), On institutions and social evolution (pp. 189–209). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. (with Olds, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., & Slater, P.) (1955). Family socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Shils, E. (Eds.) (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., Bales, R., & Shils, E. (1953). Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasley, K., & Ihinger-Tallman, M. (1988). Remarriages and stepfamilies. In C. S. Chilman, E. W. Nunnally, & F. M. Cox (Eds.), Variant family forms (pp. 204–221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. R. (1964). The structural-functional approach. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 5–124). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. (1983). Work and family: Achieving a balance. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley, Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 163–177). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and function in primitive societies. London: Cohen & West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1966). Family organization and the probability of disorganization. Journal of Marriage and Family, 28, 407–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1968). A social system analysis of dissolved and existing marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 452–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1970). Opportunity and the family. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1983). Shaping tomorrow’s family: Theory and policy for the 21st century. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1989). Alternative images for public policy: Family structure versus families struggling. Policy Studies Review, 8, 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1991). On balancing the policy interests of children and adults. In E. A. Anderson & R. C. Jula (Eds.), Family policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., & Godwin, D. D. (1990). Negotiation effectiveness and acceptable outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 293–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., & Marsiglio, W. (1993). New action theory and contemporary families. Journal of Family Issues, 14(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., Polonko, K., Teachman, J., & Thompson, L. (1989). The sexual bond: Rethinking families and close relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, J. R., Sim, R. A., & Loosley, E. W. (1956). Crestwood Heights. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1961). Review article: The social theories of Talcott Parsons. American Sociological Review, 26, 928–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D. A. (1983). Dual-career families: Strains of sharing. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 90–110). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G. W., Jr. (Ed.) (1984). Dr. Durkheim and Mr. Brown: Comparative sociology at Cambridge in 1910. In G. W. Stocking, Jr. (Ed.), Functionalism historicized (Vol. II, pp. 106–130). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1987) (Eds.). Handbook of marriage and family. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1987). American families and households. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubin, S. B., & Mudd, E. H. (1983). Contemporary traditional families: The undefined majority. In E. D. Macklin & R. H. Rubin (Eds.), Contemporary families and alternative lifestyles (pp. 256–270). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J., Polonko, K., & Scanzoni, J. (1987). Demography of the family. In M. Sussman & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 3–36). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Gongla, P. A. (1983). Single parent families: In the mainstream of American society. In E. D. Macklin & R. H. Rubin (Eds.), Contemporary families and alternative lifestyles (pp. 97–124). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the U.S. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 873–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1974). The structure of sociological theory (1st ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1978). The structure of sociological theory (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1986). The structure of sociological theory (4th ed.). Chicago: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1988). A theory of social interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, E., & Visher, J. (1983). Stepparenting: Blended families. In H. I. McCubbin & C. R. Figley (Eds.), Stress and the family: Vol. I. Coping with normative transitions (pp. 133–148). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. M. Jr. (1961). The sociological theory of Talcott Parsons. In Max Black (Ed.), The social theories of Talcott Parsons: A critical examination (pp. 64–99). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, R. T. (1963). The modern family. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D. (1981). New rules: Searching for self-fulfillment in a world turned upside down. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kingsbury, N., Scanzoni, J. (2009). Structural-Functionalism. In: Boss, P., Doherty, W.J., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W.R., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44264-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85764-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics