Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusion: The Essence of Peace? Toward a Comprehensive and Parsimonious Model of Sustainable Peace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

The excellent chapters in this book offer a vast array of psychosocial conditions and processes which have been linked to sustainable peace. This concluding chapter offers a summary and synthesis of this research; highlighting the basic commonalities of the construct of sustainable peace that underlay the many aspects discussed in the book, and offering a more parsimonious model of sustainable peace, informed by dynamical systems theory, which conceptualizes the effects of the many component parts on increasing and decreasing the probabilities of stable dynamics of destructive conflict and peace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartoli, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., & Nowak, A. (2010). Peace is in movement: A dynamical systems perspective on the emergence of peace in Mozambique. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16(2), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, G. (2007). Islands of agreement: Managing enduring armed rivalries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1978). Stable peace. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of peace: The hidden side of history. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T. (2006). Conflict, complexity, and change: A meta-framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts – III. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12(4), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems. In A. K. Schneider & C. Honeyman (Eds.), The negotiator’s fieldbook: The desk reference for the experienced negotiator (pp. 61–74). Chicago: American Bar Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R. R., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor: Presenting a model of conflict, escalation, and intractability. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1454–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Hacking, A., Stover, M., Fisher-Yoshida, B., & Nowak, A. (2008). Reconstructing ripeness I: A study of constructive engagement in protracted social conflicts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., & Bartoli, A. (2011). Navigating the landscape of conflict: Applications of dynamical systems theory to protracted social conflict. In N. Ropers (Ed.), Systemic thinking and conflict transformation. Berlin: Berghof Foundation for Peace Support.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2000). Economic causes of civil conflict and their implications for policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, O. (1996). The logic of future: why things go wrong and what we can do to make them right. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, M. (1996). A Nested theary of conflict. Women in leadership, 1, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D. P. (2006). The human potential for peace: An anthropological challenge to assumptions about war and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., Murray, C. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (2000). Peoples versus states. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2006). The American pursuit of unhappiness: Gross National Happiness (GNH), a new socioeconomic policy. Executive white paper. Las Vegas: International Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.). (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (Society for industrial and organizational psychology frontiers series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. (2008). The peace scale: Conceptualizing and operationalizing nonrivalry and peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, L. (1999). Intractable conflict. In E. Weinar (Ed.). The handbook of intrathanic coexistance, pp 332–342. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M. (1999). The complex dynamics of high performance teams. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 30, 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, T. D., Crenshaw, M., McClintock, C., & Walter, B. (2007). How political violence ends: Paths to conflict de-escalation and termination. APSA task force on political violence and terrorism, Group 3. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A. (2004). Dynamical minimalism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., & Coleman, P. T. (2006). Attracted to conflict: A dynamical perspective on malignant social relations. In A. Golec & K. Skarzynska (Eds.), Understanding social change: Political psychology in Poland. Haauppague: Nova Science Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seager, T. (2008). The sustainability spectrum and the sciences of sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 444–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, S. J., Rothchild, D., & Cousens, E. M. (2002). Ending civil wars: The implementation of peace agreements. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhrke, A., & Samset, I. (2007). What’s in a figure? Estimating recurrence of civil war. International Peacekeeping, 14(2), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2004). A more secure world: Our shared responsibility. Report of the United Nations High-Level Panel on threats, challenges and change. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2010). Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems. American Psychologist, 65(4), 262–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Peter T. Coleman Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Peter T. Coleman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter T. Coleman Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Columbia University, International Center for Cooperation and, Teacher's College, West 120th Street 525, NEW YORK, 10027, USA

    Peter T. Coleman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coleman, P.T. (2012). Conclusion: The Essence of Peace? Toward a Comprehensive and Parsimonious Model of Sustainable Peace. In: Coleman, P. (eds) Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3555-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation