Skip to main content

Hypothesis Tests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EnvStats
  • 2343 Accesses

Abstract

If you are comparing chemical concentrations between a background area and a potentially contaminated area, how different do the concentrations in these two areas have to be before you decide that the potentially contaminated area is in fact contaminated? In the last chapter we showed how to use prediction and tolerance intervals to try to answer this question. There are other kinds of hypothesis tests you can use as well. R contains several functions for performing classical statistical hypothesis tests, such as t-tests, analysis of variance, linear regression, nonparametric tests, quality control procedures, and time series analysis (see the R documentation and help files). EnvStats contains modifications of some of these functions (e.g., summaryStats and stripChart), as well as functions for statistical tests that are not included in R but that are used in environmental statistics, such as the Shapiro-Francia goodness-of-fit test, Kendall’s seasonal test for trend, and the quantile test for a shift in the tail of the distribution (see the help file Hypothesis Tests). This chapter discusses these functions. See Millard et al. (2014) for a more in-depth discussion of hypothesis tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen, L. (1995a). A Minimum Cost Estimator for the Mean of Positively Skewed Distributions with Applications to Estimation of Exposure to Contaminated Soils. Environmetrics 6, 181−193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (1995b). Testing the Mean of Skewed Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430), 767−772.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W.J. (1980). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 493 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliben, J.J. (1975). The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality. Technometrics 17(1), 111−117.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, L.D., and G. van Belle. (1993). Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 991 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R.D. (1994). Statistical Methods for Groundwater Monitoring. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 286 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, R.M., J.R. Slack, and R.A. Smith. (1982). Techniques of Trend Analysis for Monthly Water Quality Data. Water Resources Research 18(1), 107−121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.A., S. Verrill, and D.H. Moore. (1987). Two-Sample Rank Tests for Detecting Changes That Occur in a Small Proportion of the Treated Population. Biometrics 43, 641−655.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H.B. (1945). Nonparametric Tests Against Trend. Econometrica 13, 245-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, S.P., P. Dixon, and N.K. Neerchal. (2014). Environmental Statistics with R. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, S.P., and N.K. Neerchal. (2001). Environmental Statistics with S-Plus. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 830 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neerchal, N. K., and S. L. Brunenmeister. (1993). Estimation of Trend in Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Data. In Patil, G.P., and C.R. Rao, eds., Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 6: Multivariate Environmental Statistics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Chapter 19, 407−422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., N. Armbya, and A. Singh. (2010b). ProUCL Version 4.1.00 Technical Guide (Draft). EPA/600/R-07/041, May 2010. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2002d). Calculating Upper Confidence Limits for Exposure Point Concentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites. OSWER 9285.6-10, December 2002. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2009). Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities: Unified Guidance. EPA 530-R-09-007, March 2009. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Program Implementation and Information Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Belle, G. (2008). Statistical Rules of Thumb. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, R.M. (1986). The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for the Normal, Lognormal, and Gumbel Distributional Hypotheses. Water Resources Research 22(4), 587−590. (Correction, Water Resources Research 23(10), 2013, 1987.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, M.B., and S.S. Shapiro. (1968). The Joint Assessment of Normality of Several Independent Samples. Technometrics 10(4), 825−839.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis. Fifth Edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Millard, S.P. (2013). Hypothesis Tests. In: EnvStats. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8456-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics