Abstract
Principal component analysis has often been dealt with in textbooks as a special case of factor analysis, and this tendency has been continued by many computer packages which treat PCA as one option in a program for factor analysis—see Appendix A2. This view is misguided since PCA and factor analysis, as usually defined, are really quite distinct techniques. The confusion may have arisen, in part, because of Hotelling’s (1933) original paper, in which principal components were introduced in the context of providing a small number of ‘more fundamental’ variables which determine the values of the p original variables. This is very much in the spirit of the factor model introduced in Section 7.1, although Girschick (1936) indicates that there were soon criticisms of Hotelling’s method of PCs, as being inappropriate for factor analysis. Further confusion results from the fact that practitioners of ‘factor analysis’ do not always have the same definition of the technique (see Jackson, 1981). The definition adopted in this chapter is, however, fairly standard.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jolliffe, I.T. (1986). Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis. In: Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1906-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1904-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive