Abstract
Recent research shows a link between higher rates of political participation of women and less corruption, yet little is known about the link between attitudes towards female political leadership and the acceptance of corruption. In order to fill this knowledge gap, this study employs data from the sixth wave (2010–2014) of the World Values Surveys for Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe. The study finds that people who agree that men are better political leaders than women, regardless of their gender, are more likely to state that corruption is justifiable. The findings corroborate the argument that corruption is deeply rooted in patriarchal structures, which need to be addressed to achieve both higher political participation of women and lower levels of corruption. This chapter is relevant to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5, target 5.5, which focuses on the political participation of women and SDG 16, target 16.5, which focuses on the reduction of corruption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alatas, V., Cameron, L., Chaudhuri, A., Erkal, N., & Gangadharan, L. (2009). Gender, Culture, and Corruption: Insights from an Experimental Analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 663–680.
Alhassan-Alolo, N. (2007). Gender and Corruption: Testing the New Consensus. Public Administration and Development, 27(3), 227–237.
Bardhan, P. (2006). The Economist’s Approach to the Problem of Corruption. World Development, 34(2), 341–348.
Barnes, T. D., & Beaulieu, E. (2014). Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud. Politics & Gender, 10(3), 365–391.
Bauer, G., & Burnet, J. E. (2013). Gender Quotas, Democracy, and Women’s Representation in Africa: Some Insights from Democratic Botswana and Autocratic Rwanda. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41(2), 103–112.
Bjarnegård, E. (2013). Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bratton, K. A., & Ray, L. P. (2002). Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428–437.
Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are Women Really the “Fairer” Sex? Corruption and Women in Government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(4), 423–429.
Echazu, L. (2010). Corruption and the Balance of Gender Power. Review of Law & Economics, 6(1), 59–74.
Eicher, T., García-Peñalosa, C., & van Ypersele, T. (2009). Education, Corruption, and the Distribution of Income. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(3), 205–231.
Enloe, C. (2017). The Big Push: Exposing and Challenging the Persistence of Patriarchy. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Esarey, J., & Chirillo, G. (2013). “Fairer Sex” or Purity Myth? Corruption, Gender, and Institutional Context. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 361–389.
Esarey, J., & Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2018). Women’s Representation, Accountability and Corruption in Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 659–690.
Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280.
Friedman, E. (2000). Unfinished Transitions: Women and the Gendered Development of Democracy in Venezuela, 1936–1996. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., Maisel, L. S., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 235–248.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.
Goetz, A.-M. (2007). Political Cleaners: Women as the New Anti-Corruption Force? Development and Change, 38(1), 87–105.
Goetz, A.-M., & Hassim, S. (Eds.). (2003). No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. London: Zed Books.
Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of Patriarchy and Violence against Women Resurrecting “Patriarchy” as a Theoretical Tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553–573.
Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B., et al. (Eds.). (2014). World Values Survey: Round Six—Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp.
King, E. M., & Mason, A. D. (2001). Engendering Development through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. World Bank Policy Research Report 21776. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/01/891686/engendering-development-through-gender-equality-rights-resources-voice
Kittilson, M. C. (2006). Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Lui, F. T. (1985). An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760–781.
Matland, R. E., & Brown, D. D. (1992). District Magnitude’s Effect on Female Representation in U.S. State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 469–492.
Matland, R. E., & Montgomery, K. A. (2003). Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116.
Mill, J. S. (2015 [1861]). On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (1985). Women’s Legislative Participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 8(4), 90–101.
Prince, V. (2005). Sex vs. Gender. International Journal of Transgenderism, 8(4), 29–32.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 218–235.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.
Rule, W. (1994). Women’s Underrepresentation and Electoral Systems. Political Science and Politics, 27(4), 689–692.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Mishler, W. (2005). An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 407–428.
Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. S. (2002). Modeling Multilevel Data Structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218–237.
Sung, H.-E. (2003). Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited. Social Forces, 82(2), 703–723.
Sung, H.-E. (2006). From Victims to Saviours? Women, Power and Corruption. Current History: A Journal of Contemporary World Affairs, 105, 139–143.
Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and Corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55.
Thomas, S. (2005). Introduction. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future (pp. 3–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Transparency International. (n.d.). What is Corruption? Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption
Truex, R. (2011). Corruption, Attitudes, and Education: Survey Evidence from Nepal. World Development, 39(7), 1133–1142.
Waylen, G. (2003). Gender and Transitions: What Do We Know? Democratization, 10(1), 157–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merkle, O., Wong, PH. (2020). It Is All about Power: Corruption, Patriarchy and the Political Participation of Women. In: Konte, M., Tirivayi, N. (eds) Women and Sustainable Human Development. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14935-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14935-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14934-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14935-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)