Abstract
Depending on the purpose of a manufactured part, quality assessment is performed within macro-, micro-, or mesoscale. The first two apply strictly to geometry and surface texture (topography or profile) measurements, respectively. The latter however, applies for measurements of features that do not belong strictly to either of the two scales mentioned above, and its boundaries are ambiguous in their nature, often overlapping the two basic scales. In this paper the authors have undertaken the assessment of the possibility to use macro-scale dedicated scanners for surface asperities measurement – features usually considered as micro-scale. The choice of the measurement systems was inspired by the limitations of previously used roughness measurement systems, which lacked a sufficient vertical range. At the same time, due to high roughness values, large areas have to be measured, which would take significant amount of time, when performing traditional roughness measurement. Several scanners were evaluated: white and blue structural light, laser, and laser with tracking device. The collected data were compared to the results obtained from a specialized Coherent Scanning Interferometer (CSI). The final results have undergone a two-level assessment: qualitative, which compared the quality of whole surfaces; quantitative, using surface texture parameters. The results allow to state that 3D scanners can be used in some cases for surface asperities assessment, however most promising values were obtained, when using devices with higher resolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wieczorowski M (2018) Digitization of surfaces in micro, meso and macro applications. Mechanik 11
Senin N, Leach R (2018) Information-rich surface metrology. Procedia CIRP 75:19–26 ISSN 2212-8271
Marteau J, Wieczorowski M, Xia Y, Bigerelle M (2014) Multiscale assessment of the accuracy of surface replication. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 2(2):044002
Youssra R, Sara R (2018) Big data and big data analytics: concepts, types and technologies. Int J Res Eng [S.l.] 5(9):524–528 ISSN 2348-7860
Cepova L, Kovacikova A, Cep R, Klaput P, Mizera O (2018) Measurement system analyses – Gauge repeatability and reproducibility methods. Measur Sci Rev 18(1):20–27
TopMap Family. https://www.polytec.com/eu/surface-metrology/products/large-area-measuring-systems/tms-500-topmap-prosurf/
Atos Core Optical 3D Scanner GOM. http://www.3dteam.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ATOS-Core.pdf
Go!SCAN 3D. https://www.creaform3d.com/en/metrology-solutions/handheld-portable-3d-scanner-goscan-3d
HandySCAN 3D. https://www.creaform3d.com/en/metrology-solutions/portable-3d-scanner-handyscan-3d
MetraSCAN 3D. https://www.creaform3d.com/en/metrology-solutions/optical-3d-scanner-metrascan
Deepak Lawrence K, Shanmugamani R, Ramamoorthy B (2014) Evaluation of image based Abbott-Firestone curve parameters using machine vision for the characterization of cylinder liner surface topography. Measurement 55:318–334 ISSN 0263-2241
Stout KJ, Blunt L, Mainsah E, Dong W, Mainsah E, Luo N, Mathia T, Sullivan P, Zahouani H (2003) Development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Tomkowski R, Kapłonek W, Kacalak W, Łukianowicz C, Lipiński D, Cincio R (2013) Digital filtration methods in the assessment of surface topography (in Polish). VI Kongres Metrologii, Kielce-Sandomierz
Laheurte R, Darnis P, Darbois N, Cahuc O, Neauport J (2012) Subsurface damage distribution characterization of ground surfaces using Abbott-Firestone curves. Opt Express 20:13551–13559
Petzing JN, Coupland JM, Leach RK (2010) The measurement of rough surface topography using coherence scanning interferometry. NPL Measurement good practice guide 116
Acknowledgments
The presented research was conducted within a task “Analysis of the influence of the surface preparation process on the measurement uncertainty of geometrical features of rings and rims” realized within a project No. POIR.01.01.01-00-0208/17, entitled: “Automated line for quality control and examination of rings and rims, with intelligent system of identification and measurement of internal defects using PA method, form measurement by means of 3D measurement heads, and inspection of mechanical properties SMART-HARD”, realized by Huta Bankowa Sp. z o.o. within Smart Growth Operational Program 2014–2020. Priority Axis I: Support for R&D activity of enterprises. Investment Priority 1b: R&D projects of enterprises.
Research was cofinanced with grants for education allocated by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland No. 02/22/DSPB/1432.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gapiński, B. et al. (2019). Use of White Light and Laser 3D Scanners for Measurement of Mesoscale Surface Asperities. In: Diering, M., Wieczorowski, M., Brown, C. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing II. MANUFACTURING 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18682-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18682-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18681-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18682-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)