Skip to main content

Why the Intrinsic Value of Hedonic Sensations Is Not Quantifiable

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Illusions of Time
  • 610 Accesses

Abstract

The intrinsic value of even the simplest hedonic sensations, sensations of physical pleasure and pain, is not quantifiable. It is not quantifiable because, in contrast to their duration, their intensity is not quantifiable. This is because sensory intensities do not have even a rough position on the same scale as their physical stimuli have a more precise position, as the durations of sensations have a rough location in time in which their stimuli have a more precise location. Consequently, there is an argument which demonstrates the non-transitivity of the relation of sameness as regards sensory intensity, but which is not applicable to their duration. This non-transitivity rules out the existence of a numerical scale along which sensory intensity can be even roughly plotted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Contrast Mayerfeld who, though he concedes ‘the inescapable roughness and uncertainty of intensity estimates’, claims: ‘The less intense suffering is preferable to the more intense suffering even though the total quantity involved (intensity multiplied by duration) is greater’ (1999, pp. 134–135). There is no such ‘total quantity’.

References

  • Mayerfeld, J. (1999). Suffering and moral responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, I. (2013). From morality to the end of reason: An essay on rights, reasons and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, I. (2014). Internal and external grounds for the nontransitivity of “Better/Worse than”. Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 2, 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, I. (2017). Inclusive ethics: Extending beneficence and egalitarian justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L. S. (2014). Intransitivity and the internal aspects view. Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 2, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingmar Persson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Persson, I. (2019). Why the Intrinsic Value of Hedonic Sensations Is Not Quantifiable. In: Arstila, V., Bardon, A., Power, S.E., Vatakis, A. (eds) The Illusions of Time. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22048-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics