Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quiet Strengths: Adaptable Introversion in the Workplace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Shyness

Abstract

A major theoretical and empirical advancement of recent work in personality science concerns the variability of personality traits and the impact on people’s lives. In this current climate, research has focused on how acting out of character can shape important life outcomes for dispositional introverts. For example, research in personality science has identified relations between acting extraverted and increases in positive affect for dispositional introverts, but also evidenced the costs. The specific nature of how individuals adapt their introversion and how they may experience the consequences in the workplace remains unexplored. We therefore review the nuances and complexities of the adaptiveness of introverts in the workplace through the lens of free-trait theory. Although we acknowledge that introversion is theoretically and empirically distinct to shyness, we see this as an opportunity to leverage a deeper understanding of introversion to provide a more well-rounded view on the adaptiveness of shyness in contexts such as the modern, dynamic workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ames, D. R., & Flynn, F. J. (2007). What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 307–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., Singer, J. E., & Baum, C. S. (1982). Stress and the environment. In G. W. Evans (Ed.), Environmental stress (pp. 15–44). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 645–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 599–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. R. (1988). Shyness: Introversion or neuroticism? Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 290–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that Can’t stop talking. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, N. W., Grandey, A., Diamond, J. A., & Krimmel, K. R. (2011). Want a tip? Service performance as a function of emotion regulation and extraversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1337–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ching, C. M., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Reyes, J. A. S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Takaoka, S., … Rincon, B. C. (2014). The manifestation of traits in everyday behavior and affect: A five-culture study. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. (1978). The impostor phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice, 15, 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 265–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective Well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté, S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. (1993). Accentuated, revealed, and quotidian personalities. Psychological Inquiry, 4(4), 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, W. R. (1995). Shyness and self-esteem in middle childhood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, W. R. (2001). Understanding shyness: Psychological perspectives. Red Globe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, L., Gowda, H. M. R., & Gowda, D. K. S. (2006). Relationship between shyness and fear among high school students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 21(3–4), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, W. L. (2015). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29(3), 310–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W. S., Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers’ judgments of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 500–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1409–1422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010). The relevance of big five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement? Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1353–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, P., Fleeson, W., & Hoyle, R. H. (2011). A self-regulatory mechanism for personality trait stability: Contra-trait effort. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. S., & Grandey, A. A. (2007). Display rules versus display autonomy: Emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and task performance in a call center simulation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 301–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2013). Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1024–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and what you feel. Personnel Psychology, 1, 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, T. W., & Alpert, B. (1989). Attributes of successful MBAs: A 20-year longitudinal study. Human Performance, 2(4), 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D., Komar, J., & Lee, W. B. (2007). The dynamics of personality states, goals, and Well-being. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 898–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques-Hamilton, R., Sun, J., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 148(9), 1538–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, M. F. (2002). Free traits, personal projects, and Well-being: The social ecology of mutable selves. Unpublished bachelor’s thesis. Ottawa, ON: Carleton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., Bono, J. E., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Klinger, R., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. (2008). The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1982–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Woolf, E. F., & Hurst, C. (2009). Is emotional labor more difficult for some than for others? A multilevel, experience-sampling study. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Day, D. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1047–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personal evaluation. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikas, S., & Ilmarinen, V. J. (2017). Happy now, tired later? Extraverted and conscientious behavior are related to immediate mood gains, but to later fatigue. Journal of Personality, 85(5), 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikas, S., Verkasalo, M., & Lonnqvist, J. E. (2013). Posing personality: Is it possible to enact the big five traits in photographs? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R. (1989). Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In D. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15–31). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R. (1996). Free traits, personal projects and idio-tapes: Three tiers for personality research. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 340–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R. (2000). Free traits and personal contexts: Expanding a social ecological model of Well-being. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. Price (Eds.), Person environment psychology (2nd ed., pp. 87–116). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R. (2005). Personality science and personal projects: Six impossible things before breakfast. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R., & Joseph, M. F. (2007). Personal projects and free traits: Mutable selves and well beings. In B. R. Little, K. Salmela-Aro, & S. D. Phillips (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action and human flourishing (pp. 51–93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R., Salmela-Aro, K., & Phillips, S. D. (2007). Personal project pursuit: Goals, action and human flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1498–1505.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, J. M., & Fleeson, W. (2006). The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 529–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiel, J. M., Lowman, J. C., & Fleeson, W. (2010). The effect of state extraversion on four types of affect. European Journal of Personality, 24(1), 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, T. (1996). Validation of a stage model of career success. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 35–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. (2009). Social anxiousness, shyness, and embarrassability. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 176–191). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D., & Côté, S. (1995). Do interpersonal traits predict affect? A comparison of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 915–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of self-control failure: motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 894–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. (1989). Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review, 14, 350–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, D. J., & Rawls, J. R. (1968). Personality characteristics and personal history data of successful and less successful executives. Psychological Reports, 23, 1032–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Person-environment fit and its implications for personality development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 72, 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Cutrona, C., & Jones, W. H. (1986). A trait-situational analysis of shyness. In W. H. Jones, J. M. Cheek, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment (pp. 239–249). Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela-Aro, K. (1992). Struggling with self: The personal projects of students seeking psychological counselling. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33, 330–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G., & Krahe, B. (1987). Lay conceptions of personality: Eliciting tiers of a scientific conception of personality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7(2), 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smillie, L. D. (2013). Why does it feel good to act like an extravert? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(12), 878–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smillie, L. D., Wilt, J., Kabbani, R., Garratt, C., & Revelle, W. (2015). Quality of social experience explains the relation between extraversion and positive affect. Emotion, 15(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2012). Stress in organizations. In N. W. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Volume 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 560–592). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spark, A., Stansmore, T., & O’Connor, P. J. (2018). The failure of introverts to emerge as leaders: The role of forecasted affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trougakos, J. P., Hideg, I., Cheng, B. H., & Beal, D. J. (2013). Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1447–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. E., Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2015). Personality and friendship satisfaction in daily life: Do everyday social interactions account for individual differences in friendship satisfaction? European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilt, J., Noftle, E. E., Fleeson, W., & Spain, J. S. (2012). The dynamic role of personality states in mediating the relationship between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1205–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelenski, J. M., Santoro, M. S., & Whelan, D. C. (2012). Would introverts be better off if they acted more like extraverts? Exploring emotional and cognitive consequences of counter-dispositional behavior. Emotion, 12(2), 290–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelenski, J. M., Whelan, D. C., Nealis, L. J., Besner, C. M., Santoro, M. S., & Wynn, J. E. (2013). Personality and affective forecasting: Trait introverts underpredict the hedonic benefits of acting extraverted. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1092–1108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Sanna Balsari-Palsule & Brian R. Little

Authors
  1. Sanna Balsari-Palsule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian R. Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Louis A. Schmidt  & Kristie L. Poole  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balsari-Palsule, S., Little, B.R. (2020). Quiet Strengths: Adaptable Introversion in the Workplace. In: Schmidt, L.A., Poole, K.L. (eds) Adaptive Shyness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38877-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation