Abstract
Earlier research presented the need for a critical re-evaluation of economics in reference to its original definition of οἰκονομία (oikonomia) or ‘household management’, referring to the effective management and allocation of resources for meeting human needs. This is an attempt to reframe the concept of ‘hard economics’, into one which is holonic and rejects closed, oversimplified and anthropocentric valuation of goods and services according to individual utility and preference. Economics cannot be isolated from other natural systems but must incorporate hard evidence about them, integrating human and natural systems into a unique understanding. The approach aims at addressing the on-going conflict between human development and sustainability, and strives to develop social learning processes about systems’ sustainability and to generate criteria to support evidence-based decision-making. The emergence of empirical evidence is facilitated by multi-disciplinary social learning that integrates qualitative and quantitative information and knowledge from different fields of science.
This paper explores how this argument has been used to support the development of the Governance Assessment Matrix Exercise (GAME) matrix and tool-kit, from social learning about qualitative criteria of sustainability (based on the Five Capitals Model of Sustainability), to a Sustainability Compass that defines quantitative metrics for monitoring advancements towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper describes the background conceptual framework, as a harder vision of economics: this holonic vision of household management pursues an efficient and effective allocation of resources for addressing human needs, which is supported by cross-disciplinary knowledge integration and social learning rather than non-supported and non-informed expression of preference. The paper concludes by summarising this process and exploring how it might be developed further through the prototype Sustainability Compass and associated metrics that might be employed in the social learning that underpins policy-relevant and evidence-based decisions directed at the realisation of the SDGs. Possible further developments are being planned for complementing the Sustainability Compass with a meta-evaluation framework that assesses the qualitative level of the metrics for this purpose.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://sisu.ut.ee/mares. BONUS MARES has been funded by BONUS (Art. 185), funded by the EU.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ashby. (2014). Requisite variety, autopoiesis, and self-organization. Carlos Gershenson Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas & Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Barnes, P. M., & Hoerber, T. C. (2013). Sustainable development and governance in Europe. The evolution of the discourse on sustainability. New York: Routlegde.
Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biermann, F. (2007). ‘Earth system governance’ as a cross cutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17, 326–337.
Bromley, D. W. (1990). Essays on the commons. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Brown, P. G., Garver, G., Helmuth, K., Howell, R., & Szeghi, S. (2008). Right relationship: Building a whole Earth economy. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Campbell, S. (2006). Risk and the subjectivity of preference. Journal of Risk Research, 9(3), 225–242.
Capra, F. (2007). In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world. Principles, perspectives and praxis. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
Chambers, N., Simmons, C., & Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing Nature’s interest: Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. London: Earthscan.
Conant, R. C., & Ashby, W. R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of System Science, 1(2), 89.
Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Daly, H. E. (2005). Economics in a full world. Scientific American, 293(3), 100–107.
Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
Evans, J. P. (2012). Environmental governance. New York: Routledge.
Farmer, P. (2005). Pathologies of power (p. 40). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Forum for the Future. (2019). The five capitals model – A framework for sustainability. Accessed Mar 03, 2019, from https://www.forumforthefuture.org/the-five-capitals
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1990). Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291.
Graves, P. E. (2002). Valuing public goods. University of Colorado, Department of Economics. http://spot.colorado.edu/~gravesp/GravesRevtext.htm
Green, S., & Lemon, M. (1996). Perceptual landscapes in Agrarian systems: Degradation processes in North-western Epirus and the Argolid Valley, Greece. Ecumene, 3(2), 181–199.
Griffin, L. (2013). Governance for sustainability in the European Union: A post-political project. In P. M. Barnes & T. C. Hoerber (Eds.), Sustainable development and governance in Europe, the evolution of the discourse on sustainability (p. 8). New York: Routlegde.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Ho, K. (2007). Structural violence as a human rights violation. Essex Human Rights Review, 4(2), 1–17.
Holling, C. S. (Ed.). (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. London: Wiley.
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth? The transition to a sustainable economy. Sustainable Development Commission.
Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neo-liberalism and urban governance: A state theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 454.
Johnson, K. A., Dana, G., Jordan, N. R., Draeger, K. J., Kapuscinski, A., Schmitt Olabisi, L. K., & Reich, P. B. (2012). Using participatory scenarios to stimulate social learning for collaborative sustainable development. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04780-170209.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Kaul, I., & Mendoza, R. U. (2002). Advancing the concept of public goods. In I. Kaul, P. Conceincao, K. Le Goulven, & R. U. Mendoza (Eds.), Providing global public goods–Managing globalisation. UNDP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, R., S. Parto and R.B. Gibson (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(½), 12–30.
Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine (1990 repr). London: Hutchinson (Penguin Group).
Landman, T. (2006). Studying human rights (p. 45). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lemon, M., Jeffrey, P., McIntosh, B. S., & Oxley, T. (2004). Understanding the perceptions of change: A pathways contribution to community consultation and environmental decision-making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 6(2), 1–23.
McFadden, D. (2014). The new science of pleasure: Consumer choice behavior and the measurement of well-being. Chapters 7–48.
McLeod, S. (2014). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply psychology. Consulted 05.02.2015 and 8.10.2018, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
Meadowcroft, J. (2013). Reaching the limits? Developed country engagement with sustainable development in a challenging conjuncture. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 13, 988–1002.
Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tábara, D., & Tippet, J. (2007). Social learning in European river basin management: Barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/
Oskamp, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2005). Attitudes and opinions. Psychology Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2009). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493–535.
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 382.
Porritt, J. (2007). Capitalism as if the world matters. Abingdon. Oxon: Earthscan.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House Business Books.
Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., & Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4), r1.
Röckstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
Röling, N. G. (2002). Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences. In C. Leeuwis & R. Pyburn (Eds.), Wheel barrows full of frogs: Social learning in rural resource management (pp. 25–48). Assen, Drenthe: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
Rumsfeld, D. H., & Mayer, R. (2002, Feb 12). US Department of Defense News and Briefing. Accessed Mar 30, 2019, from https://archive.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=2636
Sachs, S. E. (2003). The changing definition of security. International relations. Merton College, Oxford. Consulted 6.11.2014, from http://www.stevesachs.com/papers/paper_security.html
Sagebiel, J., Schwartz, C., Rhozyel, M., Rajmis, S., Hirschfeld, J. (2016, March/April). Economic valuation of Baltic marine ecosystem services: Blind spots and limited consistency. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(4), 991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv264
Sajeva, M. (2016). Governance for sustainable systems: The development of a participatory framework. De Montfort University, Leicester. https://www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/13125
Sajeva, M., & Masera, M. (2006). A strategic approach to risk governance of critical infrastructures. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 2(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2006.011346.
Sajeva, M., Singh Sahota, P., & Lemon, M. (2015). Giving sustainability a chance: A participatory framework for choosing between alternative futures. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (JOTSC), 12(1), 57–89.
Sajeva, M., Mitchell, A., & Lemon, M. (2019a). Reconfiguring household management in times of discontinuity as an open system: The case of agro-food chains. International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFBMBM.2019010101.
Sajeva, M., Valonen, M., Maidell, M., Lemon, M., & Mitchell, A. (2019b). Are we lost in the ocean of human development? Finding our way through a SUSTAINABILITY COMPASS. In Article accepted for publication in the proceedings at energising the sustainable development goals through appropriate technology and governance international conference. Leicester: De Montfort University.
Schuller, D., Brunken-Winkler, H., Busch, P., Förster, M., Janiesch, P., Lemm, R. V., Niedringhaus, R., & Strasser, H. (2000). Sustainable land-use in an agriculturally misused landscape in northwest Germany through ecotechnical restoration by a “Patch-Network-Concept”. Ecological Engineering, 16, 99–117. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-12754-0_2
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. P., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Abacus.
Sen, A. (1997). Development thinking at the beginning of the 21st century. Harvard University and London School of Economics and Political Sciences.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom (p. 74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slim, A. (2013). The impact of de-growth (la décroissance) on the discourse of sustainability. In P. M. Barnes & T. C. Hoerber (Eds.), Sustainable development and governance in Europe, The evolution of the discourse on sustainability (pp. 48–60). New York: Routlegde.
Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. Project Report. UK Energy Research Centre.
Stern, D. I. (2014). Economic growth and energy. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, United States, web source, retrieved on 18.3.2014.
Steyaert, P., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 575–586.
Stiglitz, J. (2014). Intervention at the Italian Parliament on 24 September 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXbW4TT7fCY
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Dispossessing H20: The contested terrain of water privatisation. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 16(1), 1–18.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
The Natural Step (consulted on 9.12.2019). https://thenaturalstep.org/approach/
Türke, R. E. (2008). Governance: Systemic foundation and framework. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Consulted 11.3.2019, from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
Wals, A. E. J., & van der Leij, T. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world. Principles, perspectives and praxis. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., & Renn, O. (1995). Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1, 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sajeva, M., Lemon, M., Mitchell, A. (2020). Making ‘Soft’ Economics a ‘Hard Science’: Planning Governance for Sustainable Development Through a Sustainability Compass. In: Mattas, K., Kievit, H., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis, C. (eds) Sustainable Food Chains and Ecosystems. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39609-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39609-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39608-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39609-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)