Abstract
This study describes the characteristics and perinatal outcomes of 67 women who were pregnant in Minnesota’s only state prison for women and who received one-on-one doula support during pregnancy, labor, birth, and postpartum. Participants reported on their demographic and incarceration-related characteristics; history of physical and mental health; and satisfaction with the program and time with their baby. Doulas recorded frequency and type of contact with women, labor and birth outcomes, and their perceptions of the time women spent with their babies. In addition, women provided open-ended responses about time spent with their babies. Program participants were disproportionately women of color, had limited educational attainment, and experienced high rates of physical and mental health problems. Despite these risks, they had healthy newborns in terms of gestational age and birthweight, and a majority were delivered vaginally. Although women were generally satisfied with the time spent with their babies, open-ended responses indicated a desire for more time with their newborns, as well as the emotional pain of being separated from them. Results indicate that doula care is an innovative intervention in this carceral context and has the potential to benefit the health of women in prison and their newborns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The reason for this missingness is unknown; however, some participants may have been reluctant to share information about their mental health history given the sensitivity of these questions.
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2016). Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Retrieved from https://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Obstetric-Care-Consensus-Series/Safe-Prevention-of-the-Primary-Cesarean-Delivery
Ballen, L., & Fulcher, A. (2006). Nurses and doulas: Complementary roles to provide optimal maternity care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 35(2), 304–311.
Bard, E., Knight, M., & Plugge, E. (2016). Perinatal health care services for imprisoned pregnant women and associated outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1080-z
Barkauskas, V. (2002). Health outcomes of incarcerated pregnant women and their infants in a community-based program. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 47(5), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(02)00279-9
Barkauskas, V. H., Low, L. K., & Pimlott, S. (2002). Health outcomes of incarcerated pregnant women and their infants in a community-based program. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 47(5), 371–379.
Bell, J. F., Zimmerman, F. J., Huebner, C. E., Cawthon, M. L., Ward, D. H., & Schroeder, C. A. (2004). Perinatal health service use by women released from jail. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 15(3), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2004.0035
Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7.
Buchanan, C. (2012). Pregnant behind bars: Examining the California prison system through a reproductive justice framework. Policy Matters, 9(2), 20–27.
Carson, E. A. (2018). Prisoners in 2016. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p16.pdf
Chambers, A. N. (2009). Impact of forced separation policy on incarcerated postpartum mothers. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 10(3), 204–211.
Clarke, J. G., Hebert, M. R., Rosengard, C., Rose, J. S., DaSilva, K. M., & Stein, M. D. (2006). Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 834–839. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.060236
#Cut50. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.cut50.org/.
Dallaire, D., & Shlafer, R. (2017). Programs for currently and formerly incarcerated mothers. In C. Wildeman, A. R. Haskins, & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), When parents are incarcerated: Interdisciplinary research and interventions to support children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
DeHart, D. D. (2008). Pathways to prison: Impact of victimization in the lives of incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 14(12), 1362–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208327018
Deneux-Tharaux, C., Carmona, E., Bouvier-Colle, M.-H., & Bréart, G. (2006). Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108(3, Part 1), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24
Doula Organization of North America. (2017). What is a doula? Retrieved from https://www.dona.org/what-is-a-doula/
Ferszt, G. G., & Clarke, J. G. (2012). Health care of pregnant women in U.S. state prisons. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 23(2), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2012.0048
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
Hodnett, E. D., Gates, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Sakala, C. (2012). Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10(3), CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub4
Hotelling, B. A. (2008). Perinatal needs of pregnant, incarcerated women. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 17(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812408X298372
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Hutchinson, K., Moore, G., Propper, C., & Mariaskin, A. (2008). Incarcerated women’s psychological functioning during pregnancy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 440–453.
Inoue, D. (2003). Models of excellence 1999–2002: Innovative programs and services in America’s Public Hospitals and Health Systems. Washington, DC: National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems.
Knight, M., & Plugge, E. (2005). Risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes in imprisoned pregnant women: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 5, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-111
Kyei-Aboagye, K., Vragovic, O., & Chong, D. (2000). Birth outcome in incarcerated, high-risk pregnant women. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 55(11), 682–684.
Loper, A. B., Novero, C., & Dallaire, D. (2019). Parenting programs for incarcerated fathers and mothers: Current research and new directions. In J. M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), Handbook on children with incarcerated parents: Research, policy, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 183–203). Cham: Springer.
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., & Discoll, A. K. (2018). Births: Final data for 2016. National Vital Statistics Reports, 67(1), 55. Hyattsville, MD. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_01.pdf
Martin, S. L., Rieger, R. H., Kupper, L. L., Meyer, R. E., & Qaquish, B. F. (1997). The effect of incarceration during pregnancy on birth outcomes. Public Health Reports, 112(4), 340–346.
Maruschak, L. (2008). Medical problems of prisoners. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/html/mpp/tables/mppt10.cfm
Maruschak, L., Glaze, L., & Mumola, C. J. (2010). Incarcerated parents and their children: Findings from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. In J. M. Eddy & J. Poehlmann (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 33–51). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Mertens, D. J. (2001). Pregnancy outcomes of inmates in a large county jail setting. Public Health Nursing, 18(1), 45–53.
Petitti, D. (1985). Maternal mortality and morbidity in cesarean section. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28(4), 763–769.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing and Health, 18(4), 371–375.
Schroeder, C. A., & Bell, J. (2005). Labor support for incarcerated pregnant women: The Doula project. The Prison Journal, 85, 311–328.
Shlafer, R. J., Hellerstedt, W. L., Secor-Turner, M., Gerrity, E., & Baker, R. (2015). Doulas’ perspectives about providing support to incarcerated women: A feasibility study. Public Health Nursing, 32(4), 316–326.
Siefert, K., & Pimlott, S. (2001). Improving pregnancy outcome during imprisonment: A model residential care program. Social Work, 46(2), 125–134.
Stauber, M., Weingart, B., & Koubenec, J. (1984). Pregnancy, labor, and the puerperium in women prisoners. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 44(11), 731–737.
Sufrin, C. (2017). Jailcare: Finding the safety net for women behind bars. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Sufrin, C., Beal, L., Clarke, J., Jones, R., & Mosher, W. D. (2019). Pregnancy outcomes in US prisons, 2016–2017. American Journal of Public Health, 109(5). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305006
Terk, J., Martens, M., & Willamson, M. (1993). Pregnancy outcomes of incarcerated women. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2(5), 246–250.
Wilper, A., Woolhandler, S., & Boyd, J. (2009). Health status and access to care for inmates is substandard across the country. JCOM, 16(3), 106–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shlafer, R., Davis, L., Hindt, L., Pendleton, V. (2021). The Benefits of Doula Support for Women Who Are Pregnant in Prison and Their Newborns. In: Poehlmann-Tynan, J., Dallaire, D. (eds) Children with Incarcerated Mothers. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67599-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67599-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67598-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67599-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)