Abstract
This chapter explores the development of knowledge and technology transfer policies in Belarus during the post-Soviet period. Based on the literature and data analysis, we discuss important patterns of knowledge and technology transfer processes. Our findings demonstrate that state interventions in science and technology have had a marginal effect on private enterprises’ innovative performance but have supported large state-owned enterprises in preserving their manufacturing potential. In this regard, one of the most relevant implications for policymakers in the field of science, technology, and innovation is that the policy and its enforcement should encourage state research organizations and private enterprises and support infrastructure to collaborate, creating a synergy for innovation ecosystem development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For further details, visit http://www.gki.gov.by/upload/new%20structure/info%20for%20investors/oao_more/600038906.doc
- 2.
For further details, visit https://neg.by/novosti/otkrytj/traktor-s-dalnim-pricelom
- 3.
For further details, visit: http://www.belmarket.by/slishkom-dorogie-patenty
- 4.
Analytical report on situation and development perspectives of science and technologies in the Republic of Belarus. Access mode: http://belisa.org.by/ru/print/?brief=analytical_publ Access date: 25.05.2020.
- 5.
When deciding on the dominating R&D system (extramural vs. enterprise-based), we argue that in case of Belarus it is reasonable to consider these distributions by sectors rather than looking on broad sectors (public, business enterprise, education) because of quite complicated structure of organizational forms and subordination.
References
Akulava, M., Marozau, R., Abrashkevich. A., & Guerrero, M. (2020). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. GEM Report Belarus 2019/2020. https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50500. Accessed Oct 27 2020.
Apanasovich, N., Heras, H. A., & Parrilli, M. D. (2016). The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus. Technovation, 57, 30–40.
Arias, M., Atienza, M., & Cademartori, J. (2014). Large mining enterprises and regional development in Chile: Between the enclave and cluster. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 73–95.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2012). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312.
Belitski, M., Aginskaja, A., & Marozau, R. (2019). Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? Research Policy, 48(3), 601–615.
Belstat. (2020). On scientific and innovation activity in 2019. Statistical bulletin by State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus.
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67.
Daneyko, P., & Golenchenko, P. (2013). Hidden champions of Belarus. In P. McKiernan & D. Purg (Eds.), Hidden champions in CEE and Turkey (pp. 127–140). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342.
Djarova, J. (2011). National innovation system and innovation governance. In UN Innovation performance review of Belarus (pp. 21–42). Geneva: United Nations.
Dobrinsky, R., & Stahlecker, T. (2017). Policy frameworks, programming and initiatives. In Innovation for sustainable development – Review of Belarus (pp. 19–64). New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450–1464.
Egorov, I., & Carayannis, E. G. (1999). Transforming the post-soviet research systems through incubating technological entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2–3), 159–172.
Grudzinskii, A. (2005). The University as an entrepreneurial organization. Russian Education and Society, 47(1), 7–25.
Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,4(1), 35-50.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The journal of technology transfer, 37(1), 43–74.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2014). Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: An individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 57–74.
Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2019). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: An overview. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1347–1366.
Guerrero, M., Liñán, F., & Cáceres-Carrasco, F. R. (2020). The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies. Small Business Economics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00392-2
Hanson, P., & Pavitt, K. (1987). The comparative economics of research development and innovation in East and West: A survey. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Harryson, S., Kliknaite, S., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2008). How technology-based university research drives innovation in Europe and China: Leveraging the power of proximity. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 12–46.
Inzelt, A., & Apanasovich, N. (2017). Innovation in the enterprise sector. In Innovation for sustainable development – Review of Belarus (pp. 107–144). New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Ivy, J. (2013). State-controlled economies vs. rent-seeking states: Why small and medium enterprises might support state officials. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(3–4), 195–221.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., et al. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693.
Krammer, S. M. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845–860.
Kruk, D. (2019). Belarusian Economy in mid-2019: The aftermath of recovery growth period. BEROC Policy Paper Series, PP no.69 http://www.beroc.by/upload/iblock/251/2519dc1eb2a5355d3172413e91ced8d1.pdf. Accessed Oct 27 2020.
Kwiek, M. (2012). Universities and knowledge production in Central Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 111–126.
Lenchuk, E. B. (2006). Problems of transition to an innovative development model in post-soviet states. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 17(4), 427–438.
Lengyel, B., & Cadil, V. (2009). Innovation policy challenges in transition countries: Foreign business R&D in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Transition Studies Review, 16(1), 174–188.
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities’ spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–200.
Lundvall, B. A. (1999). National business systems and national systems of innovation. International Studies of Management and Organization, 29(2), 60–77.
Marozau, R., Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Ibañez, A. (2019). Evolving entrepreneurial activities at post-soviet universities. In J. Maxwell (Ed.), Higher education institutions: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges (pp. 201–246). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Marozau, R, & Guerrero, M. (2019). Development of the entrepreneurial university (University 3.0) in Belarus: An overview of determinants and challenges. BEROC Policy Paper Series, PP no.74 http://www.beroc.by/upload/iblock/799/79924eea6ca4d6f6163255463845de5f.pdf. Accessed Oct 27 2020.
Marozau, R., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2016). Impacts of universities in different stages of economic development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0359-7.
Marozau, R., & Guerrero, M. (2016). Conditioning factors of knowledge transfer and commercialisation in the context of post-socialist economies: The case of Belarusian higher education institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 27(4), 441–462.
Marozau, R., Aginskaja, A., et al. (2021). Hidden champions of Belarus. In A. Braček Lalić and D. Purg (Eds.), Hidden Champions in dynamically changing societies: Critical success factors for market leadership. Springer. (in press).
Martinsons, M. G., & Valdemars, K. (1992). Technology and innovation mismanagement in the Soviet enterprise. International Journal of Technology Management, 7(4–5), 359–369.
Mayntz, R. (1998). Socialist academies of sciences: The enforced orientation of basic research at user needs. Research Policy, 27(8), 781–791.
McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 153–170.
Palacín, J., & Radosevic, S. (2011). Recent economic and innovation performance. In UN Innovation performance review of Belarus (pp. 1–18). Geneva: United Nations.
Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. (2003). From a corporate venture to an independent company: A base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32(3), 463–481.
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280.
Pobol, A. (2011). Innovation and international economic integration. In UN Innovation performance review of Belarus (pp. 113–132). Geneva: United Nations.
Radas, S., & Božić, L. (2009). The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy. Technovation, 29(6), 438–450.
Radosevic, S. (1998). The transformation of national systems of innovation in Eastern Europe: between restructuring and erosion. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(1), 77–108.
Radosevic. (2017). Measuring innovation performance. In Innovation for sustainable development – Review of Belarus (pp. 65–106). New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Radosevic, S. (1996). Restructuring of R&D institutes in post-socialist economies: Emerging patterns and issues. In A. Webster (Ed.), Building new bases for innovation: The transformation of the R&D system in post-socialist states (pp. 8–30). Cambridge: Anglia Polytechnic University.
Radosevic, S. (2011). Knowledge generation and transfer. In UN Innovation performance review of Belarus (pp. 61–78). Geneva: United Nations.
Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111.
Treibich, T., Konrad, K., & Truffer, B. (2013). A dynamic view on interactions between academic spin-offs and their parent organizations. Technovation, 33(12), 450–462.
Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities: Socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic development quarterly, 27(1), 40–55.
Zhou, C., & Peng, X. (2008). The entrepreneurial university in China: Nonlinear paths. Science and Public Policy, 35(9), 637–646.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support from the Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC). Radzivon Marozau acknowledges the financial support by SIDA. Natalja Apanasovich expresses gratitude to the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research for the support provided within the framework of the project Developing and re-evaluating STI Policy Instruments and Models for Fostering Academia-Industry Cooperation. Maribel Guerrero acknowledges the Facultad de Economía y Negocios at the Universidad del Desarrollo (Chile), the Northumbria Centre for Innovation, Regional Transformation and Entrepreneurship based on Newcastle Business School at Northumbria University (UK), and the Centre for Innovation Research (CIRCLE) at Lund University (SE) for their invaluable support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marozau, R., Apanasovich, N., Guerrero, M. (2021). Evolution of Technology Transfer in Belarus: Two Parallel Dimensions in a Post-Soviet Country. In: Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. (eds) Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurial Innovations. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70022-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70022-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70021-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70022-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)