Skip to main content

Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart (FIMH 2021)

Abstract

Despite advances in many of the techniques used in Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI), uncertainty remains insufficiently quantified for many aspects of the pipeline. The effect of geometric uncertainty, particularly due to segmentation variability, may be the least explored to date. We use statistical shape modeling and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to compute the effect of segmentation variability on ECGI solutions. The shape model was made with Shapeworks from nine segmentations of the same patient and incorporated into an ECGI pipeline. We computed uncertainty of the pericardial potentials and local activation times (LATs) using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) implemented in UncertainSCI. Uncertainty in pericardial potentials from segmentation variation mirrored areas of high variability in the shape model, near the base of the heart and the right ventricular outflow tract, and that ECGI was less sensitive to uncertainty in the posterior region of the heart. Subsequently LAT calculations could vary dramatically due to segmentation variability, with a standard deviation as high as 126ms, yet mainly in regions with low conduction velocity. Our shape modeling and UQ pipeline presented possible uncertainty in ECGI due to segmentation variability and can be used by researchers to reduce said uncertainty or mitigate its effects. The demonstrated use of statistical shape modeling and UQ can also be extended to other types of modeling pipelines.

Supported by the National Institutes of Health, P41GM103545, R24GM136986, U24EB029012, U24EB029011, R01AR076120, and R01HL135568. Data used in this study was made available by Drs. John Sapp and Milan Horáček and their research collaboration with Dalhousie University. Thanks to Sophie Giffard-Roisin, Eric Perez-Alday, Laura Bear, Beáta Ondrušová, Svehlikova, Machteld Boonstra, Martim Kastelein, and Maryam Tolou for providing segmentations for this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aras, K., et al.: Experimental data and geometric analysis repository: EDGAR. J. Electrocardiol. 48(6), 975–981 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr, R., Ramsey, M., Spach, M.: Relating epicardial to body surface potential distributions by means of transfer coefficients based on geometry measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 24, 1–11 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burk, K.M., Narayan, A., Orr, J.A.: Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate fekete points. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 36(11), e3395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton, B., et al.: A toolkit for forward/inverse problems in electrocardiography within the SCIRun problem solving environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 33rd Annual International Conference, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cates, J., Meyer, M., Fletcher, P., Witaker, R.: Entropy-based particle systems for shape correspondence. In: Workshop on Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy, MICCAI 2006, pp. 90–99 (October 2006). http://www.sci.utah.edu/publications/cates06/Cates-miccai2006.pdf

  6. Erem, B., Brooks, D., van Dam, P., Stinstra, J., MacLeod, R.: Spatiotemporal estimation of activation times of fractionated ECGS on complex heart surfaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 33rd Annual International Conference 2011, pp. 5884–5887 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fikal, N., Aboulaich, R., El Guarmah, E., Zemzemi, N.: Propagation of two independent sources of uncertainty in the electrocardiography imaging inverse solution. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 14(2), 206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2018065

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gander, L., Krause, R., Multerer, M., Pezzuto, S.: Space-time shape uncertainties in the forward and inverse problem of electrocardiography (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geneser, S., MacLeod, R., Kirby, R.: Application of stochastic finite element methods to study the sensitivity of ECG forward modeling to organ conductivity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(1), 31–40 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geneser, S., Xiu, D., Kirby, R., Sachse, F.: Stochastic Markovian modeling of electrophysiology of ion channels: reconstruction of standard deviations in macroscopic currents. J. Theor. Biol. 245(4), 627–637 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghimire, S., et al.: Overcoming barriers to quantification and comparison of electrocardiographic imaging methods: a community- based approach. In: Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), 2017, vol. 44, pp. 1–4 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goparaju, A., et al.: Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gulrajani, R.: The forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography. EMBS Mag. 17(5), 84–101 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacLeod, R., Weinstein, D., de St. Germain, J.D., Brooks, D., Johnson, C., Parker, S.: SCIRun/BioPSE: integrated problem solving environment for bioelectric field problems and visualization. In: IEEE International Symposium Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1–3. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parker, S., Weinstein, D., Johnson, C.: The SCIRun computational steering software system. In: Arge, E., Bruaset, A., Langtangen, H. (eds.) Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, pp. 1–40. Birkhauser Press, Boston (1997). http://www.sci.utah.edu/publications/Par1997a/Parker_SCIRun1997.pdf

  16. Rupp, L.C., et al.: Using uncertainSCI to quantify uncertainty in cardiac simulations. In: Computing in Cardiology, vol. 47 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sapp, J.L., Dawoud, F., Clements, J.C., Horáček, B.M.: Inverse solution mapping of epicardial potentials: quantitative comparison with epicardial contact mapping. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 5(5), 1001–1009 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.970160. http://circep.ahajournals.org/content/5/5/1001

  18. Swenson, D., Geneser, S., Stinstra, J., Kirby, R., MacLeod, R.: Cardiac position sensitivity study in the electrocardiographic forward problem using stochastic collocation and BEM. Annal. Biomed. Eng. 30(12), 2900–2910 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tate, J.D., Zemzemi, N., Good, W.W., van Dam, P., Brooks, D.H., MacLeod, R.S.: Effect of segmentation variation on ECG imaging. In: Computing in Cardiology, vol. 45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.374

  20. Tate, J.D., Zemzemi, N., Good, W.W., van Dam, P., Brooks, D.H., MacLeod, R.S.: Shape analysis of segmentation variability. In: Computing in Cardiology, vol. 47 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiener, N.: The Homogeneous Chaos. Amer. J. Math. 60(4), 897–936 (1938)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiu, D.: Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach. Princeton University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.: The wiener-askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24(2), 619–644 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827501387826

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jess D. Tate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tate, J.D. et al. (2021). Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI. In: Ennis, D.B., Perotti, L.E., Wang, V.Y. (eds) Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart. FIMH 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12738. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78709-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78710-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics