Skip to main content

Clustering of Drivers’ State Before Takeover Situations Based on Physiological Features Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V (IHIET 2021)

Abstract

Conditionally automated cars share the driving task with the driver. When the control switches from one to another, accidents can occur, especially when the car emits a takeover request (TOR) to warn the driver that they must take the control back immediately. The driver’s physiological state prior to the TOR may impact takeover performance and as such was extensively studied experimentally. However, little was done about using Machine Learning (ML) to cluster natural states of the driver. In this study, four unsupervised ML algorithms were trained and optimized using a dataset collected in a driving simulator. Their performances for generating clusters of physiological states prior to takeover were compared. Some algorithms provide interesting insights regarding the number of clusters, but most of the results were not statistically significant. As such, we advise researchers to focus on supervised ML using ground truth labels after experimental manipulation of drivers’ states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F., Carsten, O.: Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 54, 762–771 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 78, 212–221 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johannes, B., Gaillard, A.W.: A methodology to compensate for individual differences in psychophysiological assessment. Biol. Psychol. 96, 77–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giraud, C.: Introduction to High-Dimensional Statistics (2014). https://doi.org/10.1201/b17895

  5. Darzi, A., Gaweesh, S.M., Ahmed, M.M., Novak, D.: Identifying the causes of drivers’ hazardous states using driver characteristics, vehicle kinematics, and physiological measurements. Front. Neurosci. 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00568

  6. Meteier, Q., et al.: Classification of drivers’ workload using physiological signals in conditional automation. Front. Psychol. 12, 596038 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596038

  7. Healey, J., Picard, R.W.: Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 6, 156–166 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, L., Zhao, Y., Ye, P., Zhang, J., Zou, J.: Detecting driving stress in physiological signals based on multimodal feature analysis and kernel classifiers. Expert Syst. Appl. 85, 279–291 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Awais, M., Badruddin, N., Drieberg, M.: A hybrid approach to detect driver drowsiness utilizing physiological signals to improve system performance and wearability. Sensors 17, 1991 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, N., Misu, T., Miranda, A.: Driver behavior event detection for manual annotation by clustering of the driver physiological signals. In: 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 2583–2588 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noh, Y., Kim, S., Jang, Y.J., Yoon, Y.: Modeling individual differences in driver workload inference using physiological data. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 22(1), 201–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0020-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Makowski, D., et al.: NeuroKit2: A Python Toolbox for Neurophysiological Signal Processing (2020). https://github.com/neuropsychology/NeuroKit. Accessed 28 Mar 2020

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the AdVitam project funded by the Hasler Foundation. We would also like to thank our colleagues who helped us during this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel de Salis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Salis, E. et al. (2022). Clustering of Drivers’ State Before Takeover Situations Based on Physiological Features Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V. IHIET 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85539-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85540-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics