Abstract
Contemporary manufacturing companies pay a lot of attention to product quality as this aspect affects directly their competitiveness, productivity and the reputation of the company. Traditional quality improvement methods such as Six Sigma, Lean etc. seems unable to cope with the market’s quality standards. Contemporary technological advancements allowed the successful implementation of Zero Defect Manufacturing (ZDM) which is replacing traditional quality improvement methods. According to a recent review article ZDM can be implemented in two ways the product oriented and the process oriented approach, but there is no clear understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The current research proposes a methodology for quantifying the performance of each approach. To accomplish that a set of ZDM parameters is defined to describe the problem and the proposed methodology is applied on a specific industrial use case in order to enumerate the ZDM parameters. The results from the application of the proposed methodology will assist manufacturers and researchers to select the most suitable approach to their specific case in order to achieve sustainable manufacturing. The results showed that the performance of either product or process oriented approach is heavily depending on the input parameters and use case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Colledani, M., Coupek, D., Verl, A., Aichele, J., Yemane, A.: Design and evaluation of in-line product repair strategies for defect reduction in the production of electric drives. Proc. CIRP 21, 159–164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.186
Jun, J., Chang, T.-W., Jun, S.: Quality prediction and yield improvement in process manufacturing based on data analytics. Processes 8(9), 1068 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091068
Psarommatis, F., Zheng, X., Kiritsis, D.: A two-layer criteria evaluation approach for re-scheduling efficiently semi-automated assembly lines with high number of rush orders. Proc. CIRP 97, 172–177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.221
Özcan, A.M., Akdoğan, A., Durakbasa, N.M.: Improvements in manufacturing processes by measurement and evaluation studies according to the quality management system standard in automotive industry. In: Durakbasa, N.M., Gençyılmaz, M.G. (eds.) ISPR 2020. LNME, pp. 483–492. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62784-3_41
Eleftheriadis, R.J., Myklebust, O.: A guideline of quality steps towards zero defect manufacturing in industry. In: 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, pp. 332–340 (2016)
Psarommatis, F., Prouvost, S., May, G., Kiritsis, D.: Product quality improvement policies in industry 4. 0: characteristics, enabling factors, barriers, and evolution toward zero defect manufacturing. Front. Comput. Sci. 2(August), 1–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00026
Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Milas, N.: Industrial big data as a result of IoT adoption in manufacturing. Proc. CIRP 55, 290–295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2016.07.038
Psarommatis, F., May, G., Dreyfus, P.-A., Kiritsis, D.: Zero defect manufacturing: state-of-the-art review, shortcomings and future directions in research. Int. J. Prod. Res. 7543, 1–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1605228
Krishna, L.S.R., Srikanth, P.J.: Evaluation of environmental impact of additive and subtractive manufacturing processes for sustainable manufacturing. Mater. Today Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.060
Psarommatis, F., Kiritsis, D.: A scheduling tool for achieving zero defect manufacturing (ZDM): a conceptual framework. In: Moon, I., Lee, G.M., Park, J., Kiritsis, D., von Cieminski, G. (eds.) APMS 2018. IAICT, vol. 536, pp. 271–278. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_34
Myklebust, O.: Zero defect manufacturing: a product and plant oriented lifecycle approach. Proc. CIRP 12, 246–251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.043
Eleftheriadis, R.J., Myklebust, O.: A guideline of quality steps towards zero defect manufacturing in industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, pp. 332–340 (2016)
Eger, F., Reiff, C., Brantl, B., Colledani, M., Verl, A.: Correlation analysis methods in multi-stage production systems for reaching zero-defect manufacturing. Proc. CIRP 72, 635–640 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.163
Sousa, J., Ferreira, J., Lopes, C., Sarraipa, J., Silva, J.: Enhancing the steel tube manufacturing process with a zero defects approach. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), vol. 2B-2020, February 2020. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-24678
Cheah, S.J., Amirul, A.S., Taib, F.: Tracking hidden quality costs in a manufacturing company: an action research. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 28(4), 405–425 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711111121816
Tannock, J., Saelem, S.: Manufacturing disruption costs due to quality loss. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 24(3), 263–278 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710730861
Taidi, R.: Cost of poor quality : quality management in lean manufacturing and the effectiveness of the ‘ Zero defects ’ goal ” 1,” Sci. Coop. Int. J. Financ. Business, Econ. Mark. Inf. Syst. 1(1), 61–70 (2015)
Faciane, M.: Reducing the costs of poor quality: a manufacturing case study. Walden Diss. Dr. Stud., Jan. 2018. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/5329. Accessed 01 Mar 2021
“What is Cost of Quality (COQ)? | ASQ.” https://asq.org/quality-resources/cost-of-quality. Accessed 02 Mar 2021
Myklebust, O.: Zero defect manufacturing: a product and plant oriented lifecycle approach. Proc. CIRP 12, 246–251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.043
Hoang, X.L., Hildebrandt, C., Fay, A.: Product-oriented description of manufacturing resource skills. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11), 90–95 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.240
Zheng, X., Psarommatis, F., Petrali, P., Turrin, C., Lu, J., Kiritsis, D.: A quality-oriented digital twin modelling method for manufacturing processes based on a multi-agent architecture. Proc. Manuf. 51, 309–315 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.044
Psarommatis, F., Kiritsis, D.: Identification of the inspection specifications for achieving zero defect manufacturing. In: Ameri, F., Stecke, K.E., von Cieminski, G., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) APMS 2019. IAICT, vol. 566, pp. 267–273. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30000-5_34
Acknowledgments
The presented work was partially supported by the projects Eur3ka and QU4LITY, EU H2020 projects under grant agreements No 101016175 and No 825030 accordingly. The paper reflects the authors’ views and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Psarommatis, F., Kiritsis, D. (2021). Comparison Between Product and Process Oriented Zero-Defect Manufacturing (ZDM) Approaches. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems. APMS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 630. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85874-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85874-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85873-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85874-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
