Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing an Adaptive Empathy Learning Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation Through Information Systems (WI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 46))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Empathy is a fundamental competency for daily communication, interaction, and teamwork, and thus most relevant for future jobs. Nevertheless, educational organizations are limited in providing the necessary conditions for students to develop empathy skills, due to traditional large-scale and distance-learning scenarios. In this paper, we present insights on how to design an adaptive learning tool that helps students to develop their ability to react to other people’s observed experiences through individual feedback independent of an instructor, time and location. Based on theoretical insights of 110 papers and 28 user interviews, we propose preliminary design principles for an adaptive empathy learning tool. Moreover, we evaluate the design principles as an instantiated prototype in a proof-of-concept evaluation with 25 students. The results indicate that an empathy learning tool based on the presented design knowledge seems to be a promising approach to help students to improve their empathy skills in different learning scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Being aware that empathy is a multidimensional construct, in this study we focus on the emotional and cognitive empathy [2, 25].

  2. 2.

    marvelapp.com

References

  1. OECD: The Future of Education and Skills - Education 2030 (2018). 2018-06-15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44, 113–126 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luca, J., Tarricone, P.: Does emotional intelligence affect successful teamwork? In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, pp. 367–376 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poser, M., Bittner, E.A.C.: Hybrid teamwork: consideration of teamwork concepts to reach naturalistic interaction between humans and conversational agents. In: WI2020. GITO Verlag (2020). https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_a6-poser

  5. Konrath, S.H., O’Brien, E.H., Hsing, C.: Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: a meta-analysis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15, 180–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lok, B., Foster, A.E.: Can virtual humans teach empathy? In: Foster, A.E., Yaseen, Z.S. (eds.) Teaching Empathy in Healthcare, pp. 143–163. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29876-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Seaman, J.E., Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Higher Education Reports - Babson Survey Research Group (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of Feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 81–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wambsganss, T., Söllner, M., Leimeister, J.M.: Design and evaluation of an adaptive dialog-based tutoring system for argumentation skills. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Hyderabad, India (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wambsganss, T., Rietsche, R.: Towards designing an adaptive argumentation learning tool. In: 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019), pp. 1–9. Munich (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerdes, K.E., Segal, E.A., Jackson, K.F., Mullins, J.L.: Teaching empathy: a framework rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. J. Soc. Work Educ. 47, 109–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2011.200900085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos, B.S., Junior, M.C., De Souza, J.G.: An experimental evaluation of the neuromessenger: a collaborative tool to improve the empathy of text interactions. In: Proceedings. 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, 2018 June, pp. 573–579 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2018.8538442

  14. Zierau, N., Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., Schöbel, S., Leimeister, J.M.: The anatomy of user experience with conversational agents : a taxonomy and propositions of service clues. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), pp. 1–17 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Landolt, S., Wambsganss, T., Matthias, S.: A taxonomy for deep learning in natural language processing. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buechel, S., Buffone, A., Slaff, B., Ungar, L., Sedoc, J.: Modeling empathy and distress in reaction to news stories. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2018), pp. 4758–4765 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1507

  17. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 1–6 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Festinger, L.: Cognitive dissonance. Sci. Am. 207, 93–106 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Des. Sci. IS Res. MIS Q. 28, 75 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wambsganss, T., et al.: An adaptive learning support system for argumentation skills. In: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peterson, R.T., Limbu, Y.: The convergence of mirroring and empathy: communications training in business-to-business personal selling persuasion efforts. J. Bus.-to-bus. Mark. 16, 193–219 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10517120802484551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. vom Brocke, J., Maaß, W., Buxmann, P., Maedche, A., Leimeister, J.M., Pecht, G.: Future work and enterprise systems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(4), 357–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0544-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Decety, J., Jackson, P.L.: The functional architecture of human empathy (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187

  24. Lawrence, E.J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., David, A.S.: Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychol. Med. 34, 911–919 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spreng, R.N., McKinnon, M.C., Mar, R.A., Levine, B.: The Toronto empathy questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J. Pers. Assess. 91, 62–71 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bell, H.: Creative interventions for teaching empathy in the counseling classroom. J. Creat. Ment. Heal. 13, 106–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2017.1328295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hen, M., Goroshit, M.: Emotional competencies in the education of mental health professionals. Soc. Work Educ. 30, 811–829 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.515680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Lundblad, N., Jin, M.: The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. J. Learn. Sci. 7, 102–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793141

  29. Weis, S., Süß, H.-M.: Social intelligence—a review and critical discussion of measurement concepts. In: Schulze, R., Roberts, R.D. (eds.) Emotional Intelligence. An International Handbook, pp. 203–230. Gottingen, Hogrefe (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sadler, D.R.: Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr. Sci. 18, 119–144 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kralicek, D., Von Rabenau, L., Shelar, S., Blikstein, P.: Inside out: teaching empathy and social-emotional skills. In: IDC 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 525–528. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3213525

  32. Elliot, A.J., Devine, P.G.: On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: dissonance as psychological discomfort. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 382–394 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Piaget, J., Brown, T., Thampy, K.J.: The equilibration of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development. Am. J. Educ. 94, 574–577 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1086/443876

  34. Gläser, J., Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. VS Verlag für Sozialwiss (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gregor, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S.: The anatomy of a design principle. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (Forthcoming, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25, 77–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cooper, H.M.: Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowl. Soc. 1, 104–126 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 205–224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03709

  39. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., Hay, K.E.: Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions 1, 36–48 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/174809.174813

  40. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

  41. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P.: Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 285–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied For Agile Software Development (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wambsganss, T., Niklaus, C., Söllner, M., Handschuh, S., Leimeister, J.M.: A corpus for argumentative writing support in German. In: 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wambsganss, T., Molyndris, N., Söllner, M.: Unlocking transfer learning in argumentation mining: a domain-independent modelling approach. In: 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. , Potsdam, Germany (2020). https://doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_c9-wambsganss

  45. Wambsganss, T., Winkler, R., Schmid, P., Söllner, M.: Unleashing the potential of conversational agents for course evaluations: empirical insights from a comparison with web surveys. In: Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2020), pp. 1–18. , Marrakesh, Morocco (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wambsganss, T., Winkler, R., Schmid, P., Söllner, M.: Designing a conversational agent as a formative course evaluation tool. In: 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Potsdam, Germany (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen (HSG), St.Gallen, Switzerland

    Thiemo Wambsganss

  2. University of Kassel, Information Systems and Systems Engineering, Kassel, Germany

    Florian Weber & Matthias Söllner

Authors
  1. Thiemo Wambsganss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florian Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthias Söllner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thiemo Wambsganss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Frederik Ahlemann

  2. Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Reinhard Schütte

  3. Department of Computer Science and Applied Cognitive Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Stefan Stieglitz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wambsganss, T., Weber, F., Söllner, M. (2021). Designing an Adaptive Empathy Learning Tool. In: Ahlemann, F., Schütte, R., Stieglitz, S. (eds) Innovation Through Information Systems. WI 2021. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86789-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86790-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation