Skip to main content

Rethinking the (Wool) Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local, Slow and Sustainable Fashion

Abstract

This chapter examines the limits to changing the current economic system through policy measures like green growth and the circular economy. We examine the biophysical aspects of the economy and the huge amounts of materials and energy the global economy consumes to achieve growth. Thus far, governmental responses have been incapable of addressing the underlying structural issues of the global textile industry and the accompanying exploitation of nature and peoples. While the necessary deep structural transformations are difficult to achieve through governmental policy change, we suggest that re-localisation of wool production-consumption networks is an expression of how engaged citizens can build more sustainable textile and fibre alternatives in place. Drawing on local food research, this chapter highlights the dangers of conflating local solutions with sustainability. Instead, we argue that assessing these emergent wool ventures based on how they are organised in the living landscape in specific places will enhance the understanding of what kind of socioecological impacts they can achieve. This includes how organising/connecting the activities and visions of wool entrepreneurs in place is essential if these ventures are going to be able to overcome the barriers set by the dominant growth-based system of global trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://muho.no/lyngheisenteret/en/about-us.

  2. 2.

    Norwegian expression describing community work.

References

  • Amarilla, R., Gardetti, M. A., & Gabriel, M. (2020). Sustainable luxury, craftsmanship and vicuna poncho. In M. A. Gardetti & I. Coste-Manière (Eds.), Sustainable luxury and craftsmanship (pp. 25–43). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo, E. (2013). Corporate responsibility management in fast fashion companies: The Gap Inc. case. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(2), 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, B., & Purcell, M. (2006). Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(2), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S., & De Master, K. (2011). New rural livelihoods or museums of production? Quality food initiatives in practice. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(1), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2021). The imperial mode of living. Everyday life and the ecological crisis of capitalism. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., & Chidzero, B. J. N. Y. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R., & White, C. (2019). Fibershed: Growing a movement of farmers, fashion activists, and makers for a new textile economy. Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M., Neville, B., & Whitwell, G. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.E., & Dirzo, R. (2017, July 10). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. PNAS. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1704949114

  • Chowdhury, R. (2017). The Rana Plaza disaster and the complicit behavior of elite NGOs. Organization, 24(6), 938–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2018). On meshworks and other complications of portraying contemporary organizing. In L. Gårseth-Nesbakk & F. Mellemvik (Eds.), Dealing with expectations and traditions in research (pp. 109–127). Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.42.ch7

  • DeLind, L. (2011). Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, A., & Correa Arce, M. (2021). ‘Murderous energy’ in Oaxaca, Mexico: Wind factories, territorial struggle and social warfare. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1862090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPuis, E. M., & Goodman, D. (2005). Should we go “home” to eat? Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9263-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the income for all increase the happiness for all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrnström-Fuentes, M. (2019). Confronting extractivism–the role of local struggles in the (un)making of place. Critical Perspectives on International Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., & Leipämaa-Leskinen, H. (2019). Boundary negotiations in a self-organized grassroots-led food network: The case of REKO in Finland. Sustainability, 11(15), 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A new textiles economy: Redisgning fashion's future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergene, S., Subhabrata B. B., & Hoffman, A.J. (2020). (Un)sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937892

  • Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the Third World: Imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3993785

  • Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389439

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, T. L., LaCanne, C. E., Pecenka, J. R., Schmid, R. B., Bredeson, M. M., Busenitz, K. M., Michels, A. M., Welch, K. D. & Lundgren, J. G. (2021). Defining and validating regenerative farm systems using a composite of ranked agricultural practices. F1000Research, 10, 115. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28450.1

  • Fletcher, K., & Vittersø, G. (2018). Local food initiatives and fashion change: Comparing food and clothes to better understand fashion localism. Fashion Practice, 10(2), 60–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2018.1458496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forssell, S., & Lankoski, L. (2015). The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: An examination through “alternative” characteristics. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9516-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R. (2013). The moral economy is a double-edged sword: Explaining farmers’ earnings and self-exploitation in community-supported agriculture. Economic Geography, 89(4), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. (2019). On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: Implications for sustainable growth. Ecological Economics, 162, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy: An ethical guide to transforming our communities. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H., Charnley, S., & Stanley, P. (2020). Climate change mitigation as a co-benefit of regenerative ranching: Insights from Australia and the United States. Interface Focus, 10(5), 20200027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2020.0027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2008). “If they only knew”: Color blindness and universalism in California alternative food institutions. The Professional Geographer, 60(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120802013679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., et al. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, Part II: Synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. C. (2000). Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00063-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T. P. (2010). Spin artists, and how the internet fuels the art yarn movement. Paper presented at Textiles and Settlement: From Plains Space to Cyber Space, Textile Society of America 12th Biennial Symposium, October 6–9, 2010, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, I. G., & Haugrønning, V. (2021). Naturgarvet skinn i et miljøperspektiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, I. G., & Laitala, K. (2015). His mother’s dress—Growth in the number of clothes. In P. Strandbakken & J. Gronow (Eds.), The consumer in society (pp. 311–334). Abstrakt forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, I. G., & Laitala, K. (2018). Nisseluelandet—The impact of local clothes for the survival of a textile industry in Norway. Fashion Practice, 10(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2018.1458497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, I. G., & Tobiasson, T. (2021). Lettfiks. Klær med ni liv: Bokvennen Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, I. G., & Tobiasson, T. S. (2017). Strikk med norsk ull [Knit with Norwegian wool]. Vormedal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korica, M., & Bazin, Y. (2019). Fashion and organization studies: Exploring conceptual paradoxes and empirical opportunities. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1481–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619831059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Eisenmenger, N. (2016). Transitions in sociometabolic regimes throughout human history. In H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, & V. Winiwarter (Eds.), Social ecology human-environment interactions (Vol. 5, pp. 63–92). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, M. (2016a). Spatial causalities in resource rushes: Notes from the Finnish mining boom. Journal of Agrarian Change, 16(4), 543–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, M. (2016b). The political economy of ‘flex trees’: A preliminary analysis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(4), 886–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1140646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, M. (2021). Extractivisms, existences and extinctions: Monoculture plantations and Amazon deforestation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzywoszynska, A. (2020). Nonhuman labor and the making of resources: Making soils a resource through microbial labor. Environmental Humanities, 12(1), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywoszynska, A., & Marchesi, G. (2020). Toward a relational materiality of soils: Introduction. Environmental Humanities, 12(1), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuokkanen, R. (2011). Indigenous economies, theories of subsistence and women: Exploring the social economy model for indigenous governance. American Indian Quarterly, 35(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.35.2.0215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, A. (2017). Natural regional resilience: Determining the sustainable value of a local wool industry through actor-network theory (Master's Thesis). Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2469509

  • Liboiron, M. (2021). Pollution is colonialism. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mariola, M. (2008). The local industrial complex? Questioning the link between local foods and energy use. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(2), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9115-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxey, L. (2006). Can we sustain sustainable agriculture? Learning from small-scale producer-suppliers in Canada and UK. The Geographical Journal, 172(3), 230–244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3873966

  • Misoczky, M. C., Dormelas, G. C., & Böhm, S. (2017). Organizational practices of social movements and popular struggles: Understanding the power of organizing from below. Qualitative Research in Organization and Management an International Journal, 12(4), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2017-1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, P. (2012). Growing local food: Scale and local food systems governance. Agriculture and Human Values, 29, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9331-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, S. (2020). Green colonialism in the Nordic context: Exploring Southern Saami representations of wind energy development. Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]). The great transformation. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pookulangara, S., & Shephard, A. (2013). Slow fashion movement: Understanding consumer perceptions—An exploratory study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prazeres, A. R., Carvalho, F., & Rivas, J. (2012). Cheese whey management: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 110, 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2021). Political CSR at the coalface—The roles and contradictions of multinational corporations in developing workplace dialogue. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (2017 [1972]). Stone age economics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (Ed.). (2009). Eco-sufficiency & global justice. Women write political ecology. Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M. (2021) Interview with Michiel Scheffer/Interviewer: Fibre2Fashion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., & Geels, F. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The theory of economic development (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P., & Kennelly, J. J. (2013). Sustainability and place-based enterprise. Organization & Environment, 26(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612475068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, I. G. (1989). Changing the face of the Earth. Culture, environment, history. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2020, January 12). Klimakrise og systemendring [Climate crisis and system change], Forfatternes klimaaksjon. https://forfatternesklimaaksjon.no/2020/01/12/klimakrise-og-systemendring-tone-smith/

  • Smith, T. (2021). Wie radikal ist der Green New Deal [How radical is the Green New Deal?] Prokla, 202(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v51i202.1928

  • Spash, C. (2017). Social ecological economics. In Spash, C. L. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of ecological economics. Nature and society (pp. 3–16). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash, C. (2021). Apologists for growth: Passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution. Globalizations. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1824864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R., & Singh, N. (2019). Importance of natural dye over synthetic dye: A critical. International Journal of Home Science, 5(2), 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D., & Michelletti, M. (2013). Political consumerism: Global responsibility in action. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teague, R., & Barnes, M. (2017). Grazing management that regenerates ecosystem function and grazingland livelihoods. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 34(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2017.1334706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teague, R., & Kreuter, U. (2020). Managing grazing to restore soil health, ecosystem function, and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.534187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temper, L., Demaria, F., Scheidel, A., Del Bene, D., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2018). The global environmental justice Atlas (EJAtlas): Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 13, 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0563-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivette, S. A. (2015). How local is local? Determining the boundaries of local food in practice. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(3), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, F., & Böhm, S. (2017). Against wasted politics: A critique of the circular economy. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 17(1): 23–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, F. (2008). Place matters. In F. Vanclay, M. Higgins, & A. Blackshaw (Eds.), Making sense of place: Exploring the concepts and expressions of place through different senses and lenses (pp. 3–11). National Museum of Australia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vičiūnaitė, V. (2020). Moving towards sustainability: Business models and entrepreneurship in the Norwegian wool industry (PhD diss.). Norwegian University of Life Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, D. C. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Triarchy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Palm, D., Syversen, F., Skogesal, O., & Pedersen, J. (2016). Fate and impact of used textiles exports. Phase One Report. Retrieved from Copenhagen. http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:919621/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  • Watson, D., Trzepacz, S., Rubach, S., & Johnsen, F. M. (2020). Kartlegging av brukte tekstiler og tekstilavfall i Norge (OR.11.20). https://www.ostfoldforskning.no/media/2260/or1120-kartlegging-av-brukte-tekstiler-og-tekstilavfall-i-norge.pdf

  • Wiedemann, S. G., Biggs, L., Nebel, B., Bauch, K., Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., Swan, P. G., & Watson, K. (2020). Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 1486–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, S. G., Biggs, L., Nguyen, Q. V., Clarke, S. J., Laitala, K., & Klepp, I. G. (2021). Reducing environmental impacts from garments through best practice garment use and care, using the example of a Merino wool sweater. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01909-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, M. (2003). Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00053-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tone Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, T., Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., Hagolani-Albov, S.E., Klepp, I.G., Tobiasson, T.S. (2022). Rethinking the (Wool) Economy. In: Klepp, I.G., Tobiasson, T.S. (eds) Local, Slow and Sustainable Fashion . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88300-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics