Abstract
In this chapter, we analyse how mainstream discussants articulate their objections to multiculturalism when discussing news events featuring radical right talking points on intergroup relations. Collecting discussions on two high-profile media events on the Facebook page of Helsingin Sanomat, the largest daily newspaper in the Nordic countries, we analyse both established and emergent discourses of othering. In the first case study, we analyse the debates revolving around the emergence of the far-right vigilante group Soldiers of Odin in January 2016, while the second case examines the discussion on the election of Jussi Halla-aho as the chairman of the radical right populist Finns Party in June 2017. We find that lay discussants construct a category of ‘internal enemies’, and present them as multiculturalist traitors of the nation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Chairman from 10 June 2017 to 14 August 2021.
- 2.
The authors carefully weighed the ethical considerations regarding the collection of material. The material was collected from a public Facebook page of Helsingin Sanomat, with authors removing any information identifying the discussants cited. In a context, where the discussants participate in public debate on an open arena, “informed consent [...] although desirable, it is not [...] essential [and] can be waived if the research involves minimal risk and does not negatively affect the rights and well-being of subjects” (Sugiura, Wiles, and Pope 2016). This decision is also in line with the suggestion by Hård af Segerstad et al. (2017, 220) for using the “thumb rule” of “data minimization”, only retrieving and presenting “the data needed to pursue a specific research question.”
- 3.
A more rigorous application of the five-step model would have been counterproductive, both by downplaying the groundedness reached through the inductive approach to coding, and also because the material is composed of informal lay discourse. After all, social media commentary on popular media events nurtures a rhetoric where the element of collective curation serves to impede the kind of systematic articulations that characterise the rhetoric of the subjects the five-step model focuses on: political leaders, ethnopolitical identity entrepreneurs and ideological activists.
- 4.
All translations are by the authors. The list of original extracts in Finnish is available in Appendix A.
- 5.
Itäkeskus is a neighbourhood in Eastern Helsinki known for its large mall and its more multicultural population (at the end of 2018, 38.1% of Itäkeskus’ residents had a foreign background, especially African, currently the second highest percentage in all of Helsinki. https://ulkomaalaistaustaisethelsingissa.fi/en/content/spatial-distribution-population-foreign-background).
References
Aharoni, S. B., & Féron, E. (2020). National populism and gendered vigilantism: the case of the soldiers of Odin in Finland. Cooperation and Conflict, 55(1), 86–106.
Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (Eds.). (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies. Oxford University Press.
Bauvois, G. (2011). Entre le Grand Nord et Paris, les artistes finlandais en France au XIXème siècle. In M. Lähteenmäki & J. Ferrand (Eds.), Le Grand Tour. Du reste de l’Europe jusqu’à la Laponie — et retour. University Press Helsinki.
Berry, J. W., & Kalin, R. (2000). Multicultural policy and social psychology: The Canadian experience. In S. A. Renshon & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and cross-cultural foundations (pp. 263–284). NYU Press.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (2009). Discursive psychology, rhetoric and the issue of agency. Semen, 27. https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.8930.
Bjørgo, T., & Mareš, M. (2019). Vigilantism against migrants and minorities: Concepts and goals of current research. In T. Bjørgo & M. Mareš (Eds.), Vigilantism against migrants and minorities (pp. 1–30). Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Social space and the genesis of ‘classes.’ In J. Thompson (Ed.), Language and symbolic power (pp. 229–251). Polity Press.
Brown, R., & Gaertner, S. (Eds.). (2002). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Brubaker, R. (2002). Ethnicity without groups. European Journal of Sociology/archives Européennes De Sociologie, 43(2), 163–189.
Brubaker, R., Loveman, M., & Stamatov, P. (2004). Ethnicity as cognition. Theory and Society, 33(1), 31–64.
Condor, S., Tileaga, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Finlay, W. M. L. (2007). The propaganda of extreme hostility: Denunciation and the regulation of the group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 323–341.
Gardiner, S. L. (2005). White nationalism revisited: Demographic dystopia and white identity politics. Journal of Hate Studies, 4(1), 59–87.
Hård af Segerstad, Y., Kullenberg, C., Kasperowski, D., & Howes, C. (2017). Studying closed communities on-line: Digital methods and ethical considerations beyond informed consent and anonymity. In M. Zimmer & K. Kinder-Kurlanda (Eds.), Internet research ethics for the social age: New challenges, cases, and contexts. New edition. Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., & Platow, M. J. (2010). The new psychology of leadership. Routledge.
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1997). On the parallels between social cognition and the ‘new racism.’ British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(3), 305–329.
Keskinen, S. (2018, May). The ‘crisis’ of white hegemony, neonationalist femininities and antiracist feminism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68, 157–163.
Kotonen, T. (2019). The soldiers of Odin Finland: From a local movement to an international franchise. In T. Bjørgo & M. Miroslav (Eds.), Vigilantism against migrants and minorities (pp. 245–256). Routledge.
Laaksonen, S.-M., Pantti, M., & Titley, G. (2020). Broadcasting the movement and branding political microcelebrities: Finnish anti-immigration video practices on YouTube. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 171–194.
Laryš, M. (2019). Violent attacks against migrants and minorities in the Russian federation. In T. Bjørgo & M. Miroslav (Eds.), Vigilantism against migrants and minorities (pp. 69–85). Routledge.
Lesińska, M. (2014, February). The European backlash against immigration and multiculturalism. Journal of Sociology, 50(1), 37–50.
Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). ‘A phantom menace and the new apartheid’: The social construction of asylum seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society, 14(4), 425–452.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). Sage.
Mast, J. L. (2020). A civil sphere theory of populism: American forms and templates, from red scare to Donald Trump. In C. A. Jeffrey, P. Kivisto, & G. Sciortino (Eds.), Populism in the civil sphere (pp. 251–277). Polity.
Miller, D. (2004). Social justice in multicultural societies. In P. Van Parijs (Eds.), Cultural Diversity Versus Economic Solidarity: Proceedings of the Seventh Francqui Colloquium, Brussels, 28 February–1 March 2003 (pp. 13–31). Bibliothèque Scientifique Francqui, 6. De Boeck.
Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2014, November). No guts, no glory: How framing the collective past paves the way for anti-immigrant sentiments [Special issue: Critical junction theory]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 74–86.
Nordensvard, J., & Ketola, M. (2015). Nationalist reframing of the Finnish and Swedish welfare states—The nexus of nationalism and social policy in far-right populist parties. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 356–375.
Norocel, C., Saresma, T., Lähdesmäki, T., & Ruotsalainen, M. (2020, December). Performing ‘us’ and ‘other’: Intersectional analyses of right-wing populist media. European Journal of Cultural Studies.
Nortio, E., Niska, M., Renvik, T.A., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2020, January). ‘The nightmare of multiculturalism’: Interpreting and deploying anti-immigration rhetoric in social media. New Media & Society, 23(3), 438–456.
Pettersson, K. (2019). ‘Freedom of speech requires actions’: Exploring the discourse of politicians convicted of hate-speech against Muslims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 938–952.
Pettersson, K., & Sakki, I. (2017). Pray for the Fatherland! Discursive and digital strategies at play in nationalist political blogging. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(3), 315–349.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
Pyrhönen, N. (2015). The true colors of Finnish welfare nationalism: Consolidation of neo-populist advocacy as a resonant collective identity through mobilization of exclusionary narratives of blue-and-white solidarity. University of Helsinki.
Pyrhönen, N., Bauvois, G., & Rosenström, S. (2021). Soldiers of Odin as Peril or protection? Hybrid mediatization of oppositional framings on anti-immigration responses to the ‘refugee crisis.’ Nordiques‚ (40).
Pyysiäinen, J. (2010). Co-constructing a virtuous ingroup attitude? Evaluation of new business activities in a group interview of farmers. Text & Talk, 30(6), 701–721.
Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 325–344.
Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25(6), 921–945.
Reicher, S., Haslam, A., & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1313–1344.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. Sage.
Sakki, I., Hakoköngäs, E., & Pettersson, K. (2018). Past and present nationalist political rhetoric in Finland: Changes and continuities. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 160–180.
Sakki, I., & Martikainen, J. (2020). Mobilizing collective hatred through humour: Affective–discursive production and reception of populist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 610–634.
Sakki, I., & Pettersson, K. (2016). Discursive constructions of otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 156–170.
Shoshan, N. (2016). The management of hate: Nation, affect, and the governance of right-wing extremism in Germany. Princeton University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2016, July). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations (Reissue ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Verkuyten, M. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(Pt 3), 371–391.
Verkuyten, M. (2004, March). Everyday ways of thinking about multiculturalism. Ethnicities, 4(1), 53–74.
Verkuyten, M. (2007). Social psychology and multiculturalism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 280–297.
Verkuyten, M. (2013). Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out-group ideology and the five-step social identity model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 345–360.
Virkki, T., & Venäläinen, S. (2020). Affective (re)orientations in online discussions on the threat of violence posed by migrants. Social Identities, 26(3), 403–418.
Westlake, D. (2016, November). Multiculturalism, political parties, and the conflicting pressures of ethnic minorities and far-right parties. Party Politics, 24(4), 421–433.
Wood, C., & Finlay, W. M. L. (2008). British national party representations of Muslims in the month after the London bombings: Homogeneity, threat, and the conspiracy tradition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 707–726.
Ylä-Anttila, T., Bauvois, G., & Pyrhönen, N. (2019, December). Politicization of migration in the countermedia style: A computational and qualitative analysis of populist discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 32.
Yılmaz, Fe. (2012). Right-wing hegemony and immigration: How the populist far-right achieved hegemony through the immigration debate in Europe. Current Sociology, 60(3), 368–381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A: Extracts in Finnish
- SOO 1.18:
-
Juu sehän huolestuttaa jos suomalaiset pitää toistensa turvallisuudesta huolta! Tää meidän valtiovalta kun on panostanut vaan näihin turvapaikanhakioihin omat voimansa!
- HA 6.13:
-
Siksi, että tämän kansan on aika herätä.
- HA 8.2:
-
Jep, onneksi nämä otsikoinnit kääntyvät JHAn eduksi. Suomalaiset ovat heräämässä.
- SOO 1:16:
-
Miten nämä tph asiat nyt muka jtn yllättää.? onhan näistä jo puhuttu kohta puolivuotta, ja mihinkä tämä johtaa sekä mitä riemuja meille näistä viell tulee. Nyt naatitaan vaan.sadosta...!
Mutta minkäs teet.?? näillä mennään. Ja nyt kukin huolehtikoon itsestään sekä perheestään...parhaan kykynsä mukaan...!!
- (HA) 5.3::
-
Eikös hallitusohjelmaan ollut kirjattu 750 pakolaisen kiintiö ? Montakos niitä on otettu ? Mitä tämä kaikki on tullut jo nyt maksamaan ? Nämä valtaapitäviä hännystelevät toimittaja-junkkarit (sori kirjoitusvirhe) voisivat hoitaa työnsä ja selvittää asian kansalaisille. Ja samaan hengenvetoon kysellä näiltä puheenjohtaja-pelleiltä, miten he aikovat rahoittaa näiden ulkomailta tulleiden toiviolasten aiheuttamat kulut.
- HA 2:8:
-
Hei haloo hesassa on näitä tummia ollut iät ajat ja minulla on kolme tytärtä, joita hakenut autolla sieltä täältä tuolta turvallisuussyistä. Ja varsinkin nuorimmaistani, joka nyt 23, mamujen vuoksi itiksestä kun ei usksaltanut tUlla bussilla kotia.
Minä oon nyt 58 ja mamut lääppiny mua metrossa. Jos olisivat olleet valkoisia olisin knokannu otsaan mutta en viitsiny näitä. Ei jaksa kuunnella sitä rasisti paskaa.
- SOO 2:5:
-
Pakkohan täällä on kohta ollakkin joitakin katupartioita jos naiset ei saa rauhassa liikkua iltaisin ja poliisit ei kykene jokapaikkaan auttamaan.
- SOO 1:12:
-
Hyvä että joku partioi. Täällä Suomessa, varsinkin kotoaan poissa opiskelevat pelkäävät hitosti raiskaajia ja ryöstäjiä. ENTÄ JOS joku ryöstäisi tai hakkaisi teidät? Ja kun ei kukaan partioisi, avunhuuto on lähes turhaa, kuin miehillä ja naisilla. Olisitteko sitten samaa mieltä, jos te joutuisitte rikoksen uhreiksi?'
- SOO 2:10::
-
Ihmettelen suuresti näitä naisia jotka taistelevat rasismia vastaa samalla hyväksyvät miesjoukon kourivan naisia kadulla. Kuka puolustaa naista/tyttöä joka kohtaa 2-5 hengen miesjoukon jotka tulevat iholle.? Minäkä olen rasisti joka en hyväksy tätä, mitä nämä ovat petoja.
- HA 6:15::
-
Nuo raiskaustekstit ovat nähtävissä monella tapaa.
Tietenkin paras tilanne on, kun ketään ei raiskata, mutta tuossa toivotaan lähinnä uhreiksi joutuvan "syyttömien" sijaan joitain muita. Avaan tätä ajatusta vertauksen kautta: Jos muurari tekee huteran talon, kumman toivot asuvan siinä talossa? Muurarin itse, vai jonkun muun. Jos muurarin tekemä hutera talo romahtaa, sinne sisään jää joko viaton tai sitten muurari itse, jolloin hän joutuisi kärsimään itse oman huonon työnsä seuraukset.
- (SOO) 3.2::
-
Noi pellet kannattavat raiskauksia ja pakolaisten tekemiä väkivallantekoja. He ovat joko erittäin tyhmiä tai pakolaisia Suomeen orjatyövoimaksi hankkivan hallituksen palkkaamia.
- (HA) 6.23::
-
Suomen oikeuslaitos polkee rikosten/raiskattujen uhrien asemaa rasisti-leiman pelossa. Eurooppalainen suvaitsevasuus ja sivistystasokilpailu on johtanut MATUJEN lieviin raiskautuomioihin mikä tekee heistä immuuneja rangaistuksen pelosta.
Appendix B: Codes
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bauvois, G., Pyrhönen, N., Pyysiäinen, J. (2022). Underdogs Shepherding the Flock—Discursive Outgrouping of ‘the Internal Enemy’ in Online Discussions. In: Pettersson, K., Nortio, E. (eds) The Far-Right Discourse of Multiculturalism in Intergroup Interactions. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89066-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89066-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89065-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89066-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)