Abstract
In light of demographic change as a driver of innovation, products need to align with requirements of an aging society. Based on evidence from organizational psychology, which has identified key benefits of high age diversity in teams, and the benefits of co-creation, we expected positive outcomes in terms of innovative ideas, when product designers integrate elderly users on eye-level in co-creation processes. Therefore, we developed a design thinking field-experiment with six groups of product designers and six co-creation groups (mixed teams consisting of users aged 50–65 and design experts). With each of the 12 groups (n = 75), a two-hour formalized design thinking workshop was conducted. The workshop was designed to meet requirements of both designers and non-designers (users). As a result, 75 ideas as provided by both groups, were prepared and presented to two juries (n = 10, n = 13), one jury of interdisciplinary experts and one of non-experts. They rated all ideas in the categories “creativity”, “impact on life-long autonomy”, “contribution to social coherence” and “market potential”. Our results show that ideas of age-divers co-creation groups were rated significantly more creative and had higher impact on life-long autonomy as compared to the age-homogeneous product design groups. Thus, co-creation with elderly people facilitates innovation processes, which results in products allowing to face the demographic change. Finally, the statistics show that all 75 ideas made an above-average contribution to “social coherence”. We therefore discuss our workshop as a contribution to social innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nations, U.: Department of economic and social affairs, population division. world population prospects: the 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. In: Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (2017)
von Hippel, E.: The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Res. Policy 5(3), 212–239 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7
Weber, M.E.A., Van der Laan, D.H.: Does Customer Co-creation Really Pay Off? An Investigation into the Firm’s Benefits from Customer Involvement in New Product and Service Development. In: Brunoe, T.D., Nielsen, K., Joergensen, K.A., Taps, S.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization, and Co-Creation (MCPC 2014), Aalborg, Denmark, February 4th - 7th, 2014. LNPE, pp. 145–157. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04271-8_14
von Hippel, E.: Democratizing innovation, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2006)
Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1), 5–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Beckman, S.L., Barry, M.: Innovation as a learning process: embedding design thinking. Calif. Manage. Rev. 50(1), 25–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2307/41166415
Gardiner, P., Rothwell, R.: Tough customers: good designs. Des. Stud. 6(1), 7–17 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(85)90036-5
Kuhn, M., Prettner, K.: Population age structure and consumption growth: evidence from national transfer accounts. J. Popul. Econ. 31(1), 135–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0654-z
Halskov, K., Hansen, N.B.: The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 74, 81–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003
Kohtala, C., Hyysalo, S., Whalen, J.: A taxonomy of users’ active design engagement in the 21st century. Des. Stud. 67, 27–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.008
Großklaus, R.H.G.: Techniken zur Ideengenerierung aus Kundensicht. In: Neue Produkte einführen. Gabler. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9589-6_10
Steen, M., Menno M., De Koning, N.: Benefits of co-design in service design projects 5(2), 53–6 (2011)
Minder, B., Lassen, A.H.: The designer as jester: design practice in innovation contexts through the lens of the jester model. She Ji J. Design Econ. Innovat. 4(2), 171–185 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.05.003
Manzini, E.: Design, when everybody designs. an introduction to design for social innovation. design thinking, design theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2015)
Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Sarwar, A., Fraser, P.T.: Explanations in design thinking: new directions for an obfuscated field. She Ji J. Design Econ. Innov. 5(4), 343–355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.11.002
Kelley, T.: The art of innovation. lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm. Profile Books. London (2016)
Liedtka, J., Ogilvie, T.: Designing for Growth. A design thinking tool kit for managers. Columbia Business School Publishing, Columbia Business School Publications New York (2011)
Lewrick, M., Patrick, L., Leifer, L.: The design thinking playbook. Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2018)
Burkhardt, N., et al.: Das große Handbuch Innovation. 555 Methoden und Instrumente für mehr Kreativität und Innovation im Unternehmen, 1. Aufl. Franz Vahlen, München (2018)
Mannix, E., Neale, M.A.: What differences make a difference? the promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 6(2), 31–55 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
O'Reilly, C.A.III, Williams, K.Y., Barsade, S.: Group demography and innovation: does diversity help?. In: Gruenfeld, D.H. (Hrsg) Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Bd 1. Jai Press, Stamford Conn. u.a., pp. 183–207 (1998)
Tajfel, H.: Human groups and social categories. Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York (2010)
Hogg, M.A., Turner, J.C.: Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 26(4), 325–340 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x
Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R.A.: Blue Ocean Strategy with Harvard Business Review Classic Articles “Blue Ocean Leadership” and “Red Ocean Traps” (3 Books). Harvard Business Review Press, La Vergne (2017)
Piligrimienė, Ž., Dovalienė, A., Virvilaitė, R.: Consumer engagement in value co-creation: what kind of value it creates for company? EE 26(4) (2015). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.4.12502
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schreiner, S., Radaca, E., Meller, P. (2022). Developing a Two-Hour Design Thinking Workshop to Examine the Potentials of Age-Divers Co-creation: Why Product Design Teams Should Invite Users Aged 50+, When Designing for the Demographic Change. In: Andersen, AL., et al. Towards Sustainable Customization: Bridging Smart Products and Manufacturing Systems. CARV MCPC 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90700-6_110
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90700-6_110
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90699-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90700-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)