Abstract
Public sector organizations need to innovate their processes incrementally and radically to face political challenges. BPM ambidexterity, which is defined as the simultaneous pursuit of incremental and radical process innovation, provides a relevant lens to analyze this. Since there are only a few studies on ambidexterity in the public sector, we have conducted an embedded case study at an EU institution. We confirm that process characteristics, and the resulting culture and structure are critical enablers for the success of BPM initiatives. Departments with more mature practices for process optimization also turn out to be more open to radical process change. Moreover, temporal ambidexterity is the most common strategy to resolve the tension between incremental and radical innovation, while departments with a higher process orientation also show preference for contextual ambidexterity. We end with public sector guidelines on how to develop organizational capabilities in incremental and radical process innovation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dijkman, R., Lammers, S.V., de Jong, A.: Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance. Inf. Syst. Front. 18(4), 717–734 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9554-5
Kohlborn, T., Mueller, O., Poeppelbuss, J., Roeglinger, M.: Interview with michael rosemann on ambidextrous business process management. Bus. Process Manag. J. 20(4), 634–638 (2014)
Beverungen, D., et al.: Seven paradoxes of business process management in a hyper-connected world. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(2), 145–156 (2021)
Helbin, T., Van Looy, A.: Is business process management (BPM) ready for ambidexterity - conceptualization, implementation guidelines and research agenda. Sustainability 13(4), 1–25 (2021)
Grisold, T., Vom Brocke, J., Groß, S., Mendling, J., Röglinger, M., Stelzl, K.: Digital innovation and business process management: opportunities and challenges as perceived by practitioners. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (2021)
Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploration, exploitation and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Manag. J. 28(2), 238–256 (2003)
Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G.: A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 188–224 (2014)
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5
Stelzl, K.: Organizational ambidexterity – exploring and exploiting the role of business process and project portfolio management (2020)
Mendling, J., Pentland, B., Recker, J.: Building a complementary agenda for business process management and digital innovation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29(3), 208–219 (2020)
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., Tushman, M.L.: Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4(1), 1941–6067 (2010)
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J.: Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Manage. 34(3), 375–409 (2008)
Ng, S.C.H., Rungtusanatham, J.M., Zhao, X., Lee, T.S.: Examining process management via the lens of exploitation and exploration: reconceptualization and scale development. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 163, 1–15 (2015)
Berente, N., Lee, J.: How process improvement efforts can drive organisational innovativeness. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 26(4), 417–433 (2014)
vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(3), 486–495 (2016)
Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Vom Brocke, J.: The relation between BPM culture, BPM methods, and process performance: evidence from quantitative field studies. Inf. Manag. 57, 103175 (2020)
Van Looy, A., Van den Bergh, J.: The effect of organization size and sector on adopting business process management. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(6), 479–491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0491-3
Van Der Aalst, W.M.P., La Rosa, M., Santoro, F.M.: Business process management: don’t forget to improve the process! Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58(1), 1–6 (2016)
Hood, C.: A Public Management for all Seasons? Public Adm. 69, 3–19 (1991)
Hammer, M.: Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 68(4), 104–112 (1990)
Halachmi, A., Bovaird, T.: Process reengineering in the public sector: learning some private sector lessons. Technovation 17(5), 227–235 (1997)
Stemberger, M.I., Jaklic, J.: Towards E-government by business process change—a methodology for public sector. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 27(4), 221–232 (2007)
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Gov. Inf. Q. 28(3), 320–328 (2011)
Bandara, W., Gable, G.G., Rosemann, M.: Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 14(4), 347–360 (2005)
Recker, J.: Scientific Reseearch in Information Systems (2005)
Yin, R.: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (2017)
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11(3), 369–386 (1987)
Darke, P., Shanks, G., Broadbent, M.: Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Inf. Syst. J. 8(4), 273–289 (1998)
Bhattacherjee, A.: Introduction to Research, Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices (2012)
McCormack, K.P.: Business process orientation: do you have it? Qual. Prog. 34(1), 51–58 (2001)
Noble, H., Smith, J.: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid. Based. Nurs. 18(2), 34–35 (2015)
Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Reflections on the 2013 decade award - ‘exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited’ ten years later. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40(4), 497–514 (2015)
Manning, N., Lau, E.: Public management reforms across OECD countries. In: Public Management and Governance, pp. 65–80 (2015)
Moreno Luzon, M.D., Gil Marques, M., Arteaga, F.: Driving organisational ambidexterity through process management. The key role of cultural change. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 25(9–10), 1026–1038 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Helbin, T., Van Looy, A. (2022). Process Innovation in the EU Public Sector Through the Lens of BPM Ambidexterity. In: Marrella, A., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94342-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94343-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)