Abstract
Since 2012, garment factories in Bangladesh have been transforming with factory compliance principles to ensure better working conditions for the workers. The backdrop of such massive ‘changes’ to the production regime was the scale and severity of accidents in the factories that had killed thousands of workers. Moreover, increasingly, the ethical codes of labor practices imposed worldwide by global buyers are reshaping the organization of production and the regimes of labor deployment in the Global Production Networks. Thus, the emphasis on auditing the factories and so-called Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices converged in the production regime and governance. However, based on ethnographic insights, the chapter contends, firstly, the auditing culture is a bureaucratic process that only helps the owners accumulate capital. Secondly, it promises rhetoric of long-term growth and prosperity through which the current crises came about.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
The well-known business-driven social compliance initiatives are Social Accountability International (SAI), Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), Fair Labor Association (FLA), Business Social Compliance Initiative (BSCI), and so on, and the largest corporate-controlled auditing firms include Bureau Veritas, TÜV Rheinland, Underwriter Laboratories (UL), Registro Italiano Navale (RINA), ELEVATE, and so on.
- 4.
In the linking section different knitted panels are linked to produce a complete garment. In this section linking operators link the different panels using linking machines.
- 5.
The Labor Act 2006, which was amended in 2013 (GoB, 2013), stated the following regarding a participation committee: ‘205. 6(a) For an establishment where there is no trade union, until a trade union is formed, the workers’ representatives to the Participation Committee shall run activities related to workers’ interests in the establishment concerned.’ The provision of a participation committee often works as a barrier to establishing trade unions, as the owners liked to focus more on these committees. The law allows a participation committee to represent the workers in negotiation with the employers in absence of a trade union. Participation committees include workers of the employer’s choice and thus cannot ensure the rights of the workers, as is the case with labor welfare committees described in this chapter.
- 6.
In the garment factory, workers are paid by two methods. Some are paid a fixed monthly salary, and some are paid based on how many pieces of the product they produce. The rate of a piece is declared during the first week of each month.
- 7.
For the estimates on declining trend of garment product prices and lead time for production see Anner (2020).
References
Anderson, M. (2004). India 1858–1950: The illusion of free labor. In D. Hay & P. Craven (Eds.), Masters, servants and magistrates in Britain and the Empire (1st ed., pp. 422–455). University of North Carolina Press.
Anner, M. (2020). Squeezing workers’ rights in global supply chains: Purchasing practices in the Bangladesh garment export sector in comparative perspective. Review of International Political Economy, 7(2), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625426
Ashraf, H. (2017). Beyond building safety: An ethnographic account of health and well-being on the Bangladesh garment shop floor. In G. De Neve & R. Prentice (Eds.), Unmaking the global sweatshop: Health and safety of the world’s garment workers (1st ed., pp. 250–274). University of Pennsylvania Press.
Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labor practices in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701336580
Barrientos, S., Dolan, C. S., & Tallontire, A. (2003). A gendered value chain approach to codes of conduct in African horticulture. World Development, 31(9), 1511–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00110-4
Bear, L. (2013). The anatomies of audit: Opacity, instability and charisma in the economic governance of a Hooghly shipyard. Economy and Society, 42(3), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2013.791509
BGMEA (Bangladesh Garment Manufacturer and Exporters Association). (n.d.). We belong we care. Retrieved December 13, 2021, from https://www.bgmea.com.bd/page/Sustainability_Wellbeing_Safety
Bhuiyan, M. A. U. (2018, September 25). Analyzing the draft Bangladesh Labor (Amendment) Act 2018. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/law-analysis/news/analysing-the-draft-bangladesh-labour-amendment-act-2018-1638034
Blowfield, M. E., & Dolan, C. S. (2008). Stewards of virtue? The ethical dilemma of CSR in African horticulture. Development and Change, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00465.x
Choudhury, S. R. (2020, October 18). ‘Vulnerable’ garment workers in Bangladesh bear the brunt of the Coronavirus pandemic. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/19/coronavirus-worsened-the-reality-for-bangladesh-garment-workers.html
Chowdhury, H. T. (2013, July 25). Amendment to labor law inadequate. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/news/amendment-to-labour-law-inadequate
Cross, J. (2010). Neoliberalism as unexceptional: Economic zones and the everyday precariousness of working life in South India. Critique of Anthropology, 30(4), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X10372467
Cross, J. (2011). Detachment as corporate ethic: Materializing CSR in the diamond supply chain. Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 60, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2011.600104
De Neve, G. (2009). Power, inequality and corporate social responsibility: The politics of ethical compliance in the South Indian garment industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 63–71.
De Neve, G. (2014). Fordism, flexible specialization and CSR: How Indian garment workers critique neoliberal labor regimes. Ethnography, 15(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138112463801
Dolan, C. S. (2008). Arbitrating risk through moral values: The case of Kenya fair-trade. In G. De Neve, P. Luetchford, J. Pratt, & D. C. Wood (Eds.), Hidden hands in the market: Ethnographies of fair-trade, ethical consumption and corporate social responsibility (Research in economic anthropology) (Vol. 28, 1st ed., pp. 271–296). Emerald Group Publishing.
Dolan, C. S. (2010). Virtual moralities: The mainstreaming of fair-trade in Kenyan tea fields. Geoforum, 41(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.01.002
Dolan, C. S., & Rajak, D. (2016). The anthropology of corporate social responsibility. Berghahn Books.
Dunn, E. (2004). Privatizing Poland: Baby food, big business and the remaking of labor. Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Tavistock Publications.
GoB (Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh). (2006). The Bangladesh labor act 2006. Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
GoB (Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh). (2013). The Bangladesh labor (amendment) act 2013. Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Graeber, D. (2015). Utopia of rules: On technology, stupidity and secret joys of bureaucracy. Melville House.
Guyer, J. I. (2007). Prophecy and the near future: Thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time. American Ethnologist, 34(3), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2007.34.3.409
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Hilgers, M. (2010). The three anthropological approaches to neoliberalism. International Social Science Journal, 61(202), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01776.x
HRW (Human Rights Watch). (2013, July 15). Bangladesh: Amended labor law falls short—Some improvements, but workers rights still at serious risk. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://www.hrw.org/news/2013/07/15/bangladesh-amended-labor-law-falls-short
ITUC (International Trade Union Confederation). (n.d.). ILO committee of experts’ 2018 report confirms—No real progress in Bangladesh. International Trade Union Confederation. Retrieved December 22, 2021, from https://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/bangaldesh_evaluation_ilo_experts_2018_final_ituc_ccc.pdf
Kalb, D. (2012). Thinking about neoliberalism as if the crisis was actually happening. Social Anthropology, 20(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00215.x
Kapferer, B. (1986). Performance and the structuring of meaning and experience. In V. W. Turner & E. M. Brunner (Eds.), The anthropology of experience (1st ed., pp. 188–203). University of Illinois Press.
Khan, F. R., & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2011). CSR as imperialism: Toward a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing world. Journal of Change Management, 11(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.548943
Knudsen, S. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in local context: International capital, charitable giving and the politics of education in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1091181
Leslie, D., & Reimer, S. (1999). Spatializing commodity chains. Progress in Human Geography, 23(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259902300304
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2010). Value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.670
Lund-Thomsen, P., Nadvi, K., Chan, A., Khara, N., & Xue, H. (2011). Labor in global production networks: A comparative study of workers’ conditions in Pakistan, India, and China. CSR/CBDS Working Paper No. 2, Center for Corporate Social Responsibility/Center for Business and Development Studies, Copenhagen Business School. Retrieved February 8, 2017, from https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/58819872/Peter_Lund_Thomsen_Final_WP_Revised_3.pdf
Mezzadri, A. (2017). Garment sweatshop regimes, the laboring body, and the externalization of social responsibility over health and safety provisions. In G. De Neve & R. Prentice (Eds.), Unmaking the global sweatshop: Health and safety of the world’s garment workers (1st ed., pp. 173–202). University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nadvi, K. (2008). Global standards, global governance and the organization of global value chains. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn003
Nadvi, K., & Waltring, F. (2004). Making sense of global standards. In H. Schmitz (Ed.), Local enterprises in the global economy: Issues in governance and upgrading (1st ed., pp. 53–94). Edward Elgar.
Narotzky, S. (2015). The organic intellectuals and the production of class in Spain. In J. Carrier & D. Kalb (Eds.), Anthropologies of class (1st ed., pp. 125–164). Cambridge University Press.
Neilsno, J., & Pritchard, B. (2010). Fairness and ethicality in their place: The regional dynamics of fair trade and ethical sourcing agendas in the plantation districts of South India. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(8), 1833–1851. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4260
O’Laughlin, B. (2013). Land, labor and the production of affliction in rural southern Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(1), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00381.x
Oka, C. (2010). Channels of buyer influence and labor standard compliance: The case of Cambodia’s garment sector. In D. Lewin, B. E. Kaufman, & P. J. Gollan (Eds.), Advances in industrial and labor relations (Vol. 17, 1st ed., pp. 153–183). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Power, M. (1999). Audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
Rahman, S. (2014). Broken promises of globalization: The case of the Bangladesh garment industry. Lexington Books.
Rahman, S. (2021). The Bangladesh garment industry and the global supply chain: Choices and constraints of management. Routledge.
Rajak, D. (2016). Theatres of virtue: Collaboration, consensus, and the social life of corporate social responsibility. In C. S. Dolan & D. Rajak (Eds.), The anthropology of corporate social responsibility (1st ed., pp. 29–47). Berghahn Books.
Saxena, S. B. (2014). Made in Bangladesh, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka: The labor behind the global garments and textiles industries. Cambria Press.
Shore, C. (2008). Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093815
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 557–575.
Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies of accountability, ethics and the academy. Routledge.
Tambiah, S. J. (1979). A performative approach to ritual. Proceedings of the British Academy, 65, 113–169. Retrieved April 14, 2017, from http://publications.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/pubs/proc/volumes/pba65.html
Tambiah, S. J. (2017 [1973]). The form and meaning of magical acts: A point of view. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.3.030
Turner, V. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. PAJ Publications.
Uddin, M. (2021, December 13). It’s time to talk about the cost of compliance in RMG sector. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/views/opinion/news/its-time-talk-about-the-cost-compliance-rmg-sector-2916021
Vijayabaskar, M. (2001). Global crises, welfare provision and coping strategies of labor in Tiruppur. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(22), 38–44.
Yates, M. (2011). The human-as-waste, the labor theory of value and disposability in contemporary capitalism. Antipode, 43(5), 1679–1695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00900.x
Zaloom, C. (2006). Out of the pits: Traders and technology from Chicago to London. The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hasan, M.T. (2022). Paradoxes of Factory Compliance: Auditing, CSR, and ‘New’ Dispossession. In: Everyday Life of Ready-made Garment Kormi in Bangladesh. Approaches to Social Inequality and Difference. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99902-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99902-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99901-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99902-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)