Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coalition Logic for Specification and Verification of Smart Contract Upgrades

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13753))

Abstract

It has been argued in the literature that logics for reasoning about strategic abilities, and in particular coalition logic (CL), are well-suited for verification of properties of smart contracts on a blockchain. Smart contracts, however, can be upgraded by providing a new version of a contract on a new block. In this paper, we extend one of the recent formalisms for reasoning about updating CL models with a temporal modality connecting a newer version of a model to the previous one. In such a way, we make a step towards verification of properties of smart contracts with upgrades. We also discuss some properties of the resulting logic and the complexity of its model checking problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We will sometime use U to denote both positive and negative updates.

  2. 2.

    \(\pi _1\) and \(\pi _2\) are left and right projections of an ordered pair.

References

  1. Solidity programming language. https://soliditylang.org, Accessed 20 Jan 2022

  2. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. J. ACM 49, 672–713 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/585265.585270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonopoulos, A.M., Wood, G.: Mastering Ethereum. O’Reilly, Newton (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brünnler, K., Flumini, D., Studer, T.: A logic of blockchain updates. J. Logic Comput. 30(8), 1469–1485 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaa045

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0025774

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic, Synthese Library, vol. 337. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Galimullin, R., Ågotnes, T.: Dynamic coalition logic: granting and revoking dictatorial powers. In: Ghosh, S., Icard, T. (eds.) LORI 2021. LNCS, vol. 13039, pp. 88–101. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88708-7_7

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Galimullin, R., Ågotnes, T.: Action models for coalition logic. In: Proceedings of the 4th DaLí (2022). (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galimullin, R., Ågotnes, T.: Dictatorial dynamic coalition logic. Manuscript. Submitted to a journal (2022). https://rgalimullin.gitlab.io/DDCL/ddcldraft.pdf

  10. Gammie, P., van der Meyden, R.: MCK: model checking the logic of knowledge. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 479–483. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27813-9_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern, J.Y., Pass, R.: A knowledge-based analysis of the blockchain protocol. In: Lang, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th TARK. EPTCS, vol. 251, pp. 324–335 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.251.22

  12. Herlihy, M., Moir, M.: Blockchains and the logic of accountability: keynote address. In: Grohe, M., Koskinen, E., Shankar, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 31st LICS, pp. 27–30. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2934579

  13. Lomuscio, A., Qu, H., Raimondi, F.: MCMAS: an open-source model checker for the verification of multi-agent systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 19(1), 9–30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-015-0378-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marinkovic, B., Glavan, P., Ognjanovic, Z., Studer, T.: A temporal epistemic logic with a non-rigid set of agents for analyzing the blockchain protocol. J. Logic Comput. 29(5), 803–830 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exz007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Meyden, R.: On the specification and verification of atomic swap smart contracts. CoRR abs/1811.06099 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06099

  16. van der Meyden, R.: On the specification and verification of atomic swap smart contracts (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 1st ICBC, pp. 176–179. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOC.2019.8751250

  17. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  18. Pauly, M.: A modal logic for coalitional power in games. J. Logic Comput. 12(1), 149–166 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/12.1.149

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Tolmach, P., Li, Y., Lin, S., Liu, Y., Li, Z.: A survey of smart contract formal specification and verification. ACM Comput. Surv. 54(7), 148:1–148:38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3464421

  20. Wood, G.: Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project (2014). https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Rustam Galimullin & Thomas Ågotnes

  2. Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    Thomas Ågotnes

Authors
  1. Rustam Galimullin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Ågotnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rustam Galimullin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Özyeğin University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Reyhan Aydoğan

  2. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

    Natalia Criado

  3. Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France

    Jérôme Lang

  4. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

    Victor Sanchez-Anguix

  5. King's College London, London, UK

    Marc Serramia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galimullin, R., Ågotnes, T. (2023). Coalition Logic for Specification and Verification of Smart Contract Upgrades. In: Aydoğan, R., Criado, N., Lang, J., Sanchez-Anguix, V., Serramia, M. (eds) PRIMA 2022: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13753. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21203-1_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21202-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21203-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation