Skip to main content

User-Centric Quality of Experience Measurement

  • Conference paper
Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services (MobiCASE 2013)

Abstract

Quality-of-experience (QoE) produces the blue print of human perception, feelings, needs and intentions, while Quality-of-Service (QoS) is a technology centric metric used to assess the performance of a multimedia services and/or network. .It is quite important for service/content providers to understand user/customer experience requirements in order to improve the service quality or the content recommendation. With advent of 3G and 4G wireless networks, and efficient smart phones, the band-width hungry multimedia applications are becoming common in use on end-user devices. Thus,it is also important for telecom operators to understand the impact of wireless network performances on the user experience in mobile environment. On the fly evaluation of user experience for multimedia services is a challenging problem especially in mobile environments. It implies the collection and the correlation of a mixture of variables on network conditions, on the service, as well as on the user itself. This paper proposes an innovative mobile application that can be used for measuring user quality-of-experience on the fly with a high accuracy and the consideration of multiple parameters about the user, the network and the system. This application takes advantages of current advances in mobile technologies to measure user experience directly on the user device. In addition, it aims to preserve the user privacy by transmitting only estimated quality-of-experience to the service provider.

A short abstract of this article has been accepted as a work-in-progress report in the IEEE Pervasive Computing magazine, Oct-Dec issue, 2012. [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chihani, B., Bertin, E., Crespi, N.: Android-based QoE Management Framework. Work in Progress report, IEEE Pervasive Computing, Issue (October/December 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shaikh, J., Fiedler, M., Collange, D.: Quality of Experience from user and network perspectives. Annals of Telecommunications 65(1-2), 47–57 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chihani, B., Bertin, E., Jeanne, F., Crespi, N.: Context-aware systems: a case study. In: International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and its Applications, France (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hubbe, P., Kerboeuf, S., Leprovost, Y., Mahfoufi, Y.: An Innovative Tool for Measuring Video Streaming QoE. TECHzine Technology and Research E-ZINE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Serral-Gracià, R., Cerqueira, E., Curado, M., Yannuzzi, M., Monteiro, E., Masip-Bruin, X.: An overview of quality of experience measurement challenges for video applications in IP networks. In: International Conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Connections, Sweden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Qiao, Z.: Smarter Phone based Live QoE Measurement. In: 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN 2011), Berlin, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaw, A., Kalu, E.: Numerical Methods with Applications: Abridged, 2nd edn. (2011) ISBN: 9780578057651

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nabney, I.: NetLab: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rifai, H., Mohammed, S., Mellouk, A.: A brief synthesis of QoS-QoE methodologies. In: 10th International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS), Algiers, Algeria (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Telecommunication Union, “Methods for Subjective Determination of Tranmission Quality,” ITU Recommendation, p.800 (August 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ketykó, I., De Moor, K., De Pessemier, T., Verdejo, A.J., Vanhecke, K., Joseph, W., Martens, L., De Marez, L.: QoE measurement of mobile YouTube video streaming. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Mobile Video Delivery (MoViD 2010), Firenze, Italy (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Calyam, P., Ekicio, E., Lee, C., Haffner, M., Howes, N.: A gap-model based framework for online VVoIP QoE measurement. Journal of Communications and Networks 9(4), 446–456 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schatz, R., Egger, S.: Vienna Surfing - Assessing Mobile Broadband Quality in the Field. In: Workshop on Measurements Up the STack (W-MUST), collocated with ACM SIGCOMM, Toronto, Canada (August 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joumblatt, D., Teixeira, R., Chandrashekar, J., Taft, N.: HostView: Annotating End-Host Performance Measurements with User Feedback. In: HotMetrics Workshop, collocated with SIGMETRICS, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Collange, D., Hajji, M., Shaikh, J., Fiedler, M., Arlos, P.: User impatience and network performance. In: 8th Euro-NF Conference on Next Generation Internet (NGI), Karlskrona, Sweden (June 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kreibich, C., Weaver, N., Nechaev, B., Paxson, V.: Netalyzr: Illuminating the edge network. In: ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), Melbourne, Australia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. FasterFox, http://fasterfox.mozdev.org/ (accessed on March 2013)

  18. Laghari, K.U.R., Molina, B., Palau, C.E.: QoE Aware Service Delivery in Distributed Environment. In: IEEE Workshops of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (WAINA 2011), March 22-25, pp. 837–842 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laghari, K.U.R., Connelly, K., Crespi, N.: Toward total quality of experience: A QoE model in a communication ecosystem. IEEE Communications Magazine 50(4), 58–65 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laghari, K.R., Pham, T.T., Nguyen, H., Crespi, N.: QoM: A new quality of experience framework for multimedia services. In: Proceeding of IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 851–856 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chihani, B., ur Rehman Laghari, K., Bertin, E., Collange, D., Crespi, N., Falk, T.H. (2014). User-Centric Quality of Experience Measurement. In: Memmi, G., Blanke, U. (eds) Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services. MobiCASE 2013. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05452-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05452-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05451-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05452-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics