Abstract
Leadership has been deemed, by some earlier scholars, to be less necessary in organizations that are knowledge-intensive. It has been assumed that because experts and professionals are driven largely by intrinsic motivation, extrinsic management and leadership factors are less important. We believe this assumption is wrong. Leaders have been shown in recent studies to have a considerable influence on organizational performance in universities, research institutes, hospitals and in high-skill sports settings. What matters, we argue, is the kind of leader. Experts and professionals need to be led by other experts and professionals, those who have a deep understanding of and high ability in the core-business of their organization. Our contribution will summarize the literature on the relationship between expert leaders and organizational performance, and then we will present a theory of expert leadership in a new model that outlines the possible transfer processes through which expert leaders generate better organizational performance.
The work presented in this chapter draws on earlier work by Goodall (2012) and Goodall (2014), among other non-technical articles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is notable that despite popular belief cats are a social species and they adhere to hierarchies.
- 2.
The core business is defined here as the primary or underlying activity; it is that which is considered to be the most important or central endeavor in an organization, and it generates the most attention and income.
- 3.
This is captured in a statement attributed to André Weil, a French mathematician from the mid-twentieth century, in his ‘Weil’s Law of university hiring’: ‘First rate people hire other first rate people. Second rate people hire third rate people. Third rate people hire fifth rate people.’ Likewise, the American writer Leo Rosten is cited as having said, ‘First-rate people hire first-rate people; second-rate people hire third-rate people.’ In interviews with university presidents (Goodall 2009a), a number of heads commented on the need to put the most outstanding scholars on hiring panels to ensure that the best academics are hired.
- 4.
These are the most common critiques raised by those attending presentations of this work and also in media interviews.
- 5.
Bäker and Goodall began a new study of leadership and scientific productivity in March 2014.
References
Alvesson M (1993) Organizations as rhetoric: knowledge‐intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. J Manag Stud 30(6):997–1015
Amabile TM (1993) Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Hum Resour Manag 3(3):185–201
Amabile TM (1996) Attributions of creativity: what are the consequences? Creativity Res J 8(4):423–426
Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz ND (1989) The creative environment scales: work environment inventory. Creativity Res J 2:231–253
Andrews FM, Farris GF (1967) Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Pers Psychol 20:497–515
Antia M, Pantzalis C, Park JC (2010) CEO decision horizon and firm performance: an empirical investigation. J Corp Financ 16(3):288–301
Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadership Q 21(6):1086–1120
Artz B, Goodall AH, Oswald AJ (2014) Boss competence and worker well-being, working paper
Baker BD, Cooper BS (2005) Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire better teachers? Policy implications for high poverty schools. Educ Admin Q 41(3):449–479
Barker VL, Mueller GC (2002) CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Manag Sci 48(6):782–801
Barnowe JT (1975) Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations. Organ Behav Hum Perform 14:264–280
Basadur M, Runco MA, Vega LA (2000) Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behaviors work together: a causal process model. J Creative Behav 34:77–100
Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectation. Free Press, New York
Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: part I. J Polit Econ 81(4):813–846
Bennedsen M, Nielsen KM, Pérez-González F, Wolfenzon D (2007) Inside the family firm: the role of families in succession decisions and performance. Q J Econ 122(2):647–691
Bennis WG, Nanus B (1985) Leaders. Harper & Row, New York
Bertrand M (2009) CEOs. Annu Rev Econ 1:1.1–1.29
Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Q J Econ 118(4):1169–1208
Bishop M (2009) Now for the long term: it’s time for businesses to think about the future again. The Economist Nov 13th
Blettner DP, Chaddad FR, Bettis RA (2012) The CEO performance effect: statistical issues and a complex fit perspective. Strateg Manag J 33(8):986–999
Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Q J Econ 122(4):1351–1408
Bloom N, Genakos C, Martin R, Sadun R (2010a) Modern management: good for the environment or just hot air? Econ J 120(544):551–572
Bradley JH, Paul R, Seeman E (2006) Analyzing the structure of expert knowledge. Inf Manag 43(1):77–91
Bucher R, Stelling J (1969) Characteristics of professional organizations. J Health Soc Behav 10:3–15
Burke LA, Miller MK (1999) Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Acad Manag Exec 13:91–99
Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J Manag 30(6):749–778
Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol 4:55–81
Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J Public Econ 61:359–381
Booz & Company (2011) CEO succession report: 12th annual global CEO succession study. http://www.booz.com/media/uploads/BoozCo_CEO-Succession-Study-2011_Extended-Study-Report.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2014
Dallas L (2011) Short-termism, the financial crisis and corporate governance. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No 11-052. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1794190
Davies GJ, Garrett G (2010) Herding cats: being advice to aspiring academic and research leaders. Triarchy Press, Devon
de Groot A (1978) Thought and choice in chess, 2nd edn. Mouton De Gruyter, The Hague
Drazin R, Glynn MA, Kazanjian RK (1999) Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: a sense making perspective. Acad Manag Rev 24:286–329
Edmans A (2012) The link between employee satisfaction and firm value, with implications for corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Perspect 6(4):1–19
Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 100:363–406
Ericsson KA, Charness N, Hoffman RR, Feltovich PJ (eds) (2006) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7:117–140
Frydman C (2007) Rising through the ranks: the evolution of the market for corporate executives, 1936-2003. J Econ Hist 66(2):516–517
Gigerenzer G (2007) Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. Penguin, New York
Goodall AH (2006) Should top universities be led by top researchers, and are they? A citations analysis. J Doc 62:388–411
Goodall AH (2009a) Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities. Res Policy 38(7):1079–1092
Goodall AH (2009b) Socrates in the boardroom: why research universities should be led by top scholars. Princeton University Press, Princeton; Oxford
Goodall AH (2011) Physician-leaders and hospital performance: is there an association? Soc Sci Med 73(4):535–539
Goodall AH (2012) A theory of expert leadership. IZA Working paper, IZA Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany
Goodall, AH (2014) Leadership: experts versus generalists. Forthcoming in: Shaw K (section ed.) IZA World of labor: evidenced based policy making. Bloomsbury Press, New York
Goodall AH, Pogrebna G (Forthcoming) Expert leaders in a fast moving environment. IZA working paper no. 6715, IZA Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany
Goodall AH, Kahn LM, Oswald AJ (2011) Why do leaders matter? A study of expert knowledge in a superstar setting. J Econ Behav Organ 77:265–284
Goodall AH, McDowell JM, Singell LD (2014) Leadership and the research productivity of university departments. IZA Working paper, IZA Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany (Under review)
Gunderman R, Kanter SL (2009) Educating physicians to lead hospitals. Acad Med 84:1348–1351
Hambrick DC, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9:193–206
Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strateg Manag J 18(11):895–920
Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York
Hennessey BA, Amabile TM (2010) Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 61:569–598
Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons. Public Admin 69(Spring):3–19
Janis IL (1971) Groupthink. Psychol Today 5(6):43–46, 74–76
Jones BF, Olken BA (2005) Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Q J Econ 120(3):835–864
Jung DI (2001) Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Res J 13:185–197
Kanter R (1977) Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books, New York
Karaevli A (2007) Performance consequences of new CEO “outsiderness”: moderating effects of pre- and post-succession contexts. Strateg Manag J 28:681–706
Kelletta JB, Humphrey RH, Sleeth RG (2006) Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadership Q 17(2):146–162
Kesner IF, Dalton DR (1994) Top management turnover and CEO succession: an investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. J Manag Stud 31:701–713
Kouzes JM, Posner BZ (2003) Credibility: how leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Laverty KJ (1996) Economic “short-termism”: the debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Acad Manag Rev 21(3):825–860
Locke EA, Shaw KN, Saari LM, Latham GP (1981) Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychol Bull 90(1):125–152
Lowenstein R (2000) When genius failed: the rise and fall of long-term capital management. Random House, New York
Lucier C, Schuyt R, Handa J (2003) CEO Succession 2003: the ‘perils’ of good governance. Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean, VA
Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q J Econ 120(3):963–1002
Maccoby M (2000) Narcissistic leaders. Harv Bus Rev 78(1):68–72
Mackey A (2008) The effect of CEOs on firm performance. Strateg Manag J 29(12):1357–1367
Marginson D, McAulay L (2008) Exploring the debate on short-termism: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Strateg Manag J 29(3):273–292
McCormack J, Propper C, Smith S (2014) Herding cats? Management and university performance. Econ J 124(578): F534–F564
Mumford MD (2000) Managing creative people: strategy and tactics for innovation. Hum Resour Manag R 10:313–351
Mumford MD, Marks MA, Connelly MS, Zaccaro SJ, Reiter-Palmon R (2000) Development of leadership skills: experience, timing, and growth. Leadership Q 11:87–114
Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM (2002) Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Q 13(6):705–750
Narayanan VK (2001) Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Nesbitt J (2009) The role of short-termism in financial market crises. Aust Account Rev 19(4):314–318
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York
Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Acad Manag J 39:607–634
Oswald AJ, Proto E, Sgroi D (forthcoming) Happiness and productivity. J Labor Econ (forthcoming)
Palley TI (1997) Managerial turnover and the theory of short-termism. J Econ Behav Organ 32(4):547–557
Robertson M, Hammersley GOM (2000) Knowledge management practices within a knowledge-intensive firm: the significance of the people management dimension. J Eur Ind Train 24(2/3/4):241–253
Robertson M, Swan J (2003) ‘Control–what control?’Culture and ambiguity within a knowledge intensive firm. J Manag Stud 40(4):831–858
Salas E, Rosen MA, DiazGranados D (2010) Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. J Manag 36:941–973
Sembugamoorthy V, Chandresekaren B (1986) Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem-solving systems. In: Kolodner JL, Reisbeck CK (eds) Experience, memory, and reasoning. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 47–71
Shalley CE (1991) Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. J Appl Psychol 76:179–185
Shalley CE (1995) Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Acad Manag J 38:483–503
Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC (2000) Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: effects on satisfaction and intensions to leave. Acad Manag J 43(2):215–223
Shen W, Cannella AA (2002) Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: the impact of successor type, post-succession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Acad Manag J 45:717–733
Spender JC (1989) Industry recipes: an enquiry into the nature and sources of managerial judgement. Basil Blackwell, London
Stiles BL, Kaplan HB (2004) Adverse social comparison processes and negative self-feelings: a test of alternative models. Soc Behav Pers 32(1):31–44
Tichy NM, Bennis WG (2007) Making judgement calls. Harv Bus Rev (October):94–102
Tierney P (2008) Leadership and employee creativity. In: Zhou J, Shalley CE (eds) Handbook of organizational creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 95–124
Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB (1999) An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships. Pers Psychol 52:591–620
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131
Waldman DA, Yammarino FJ (1999) CEO charismatic leadership: levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):266–285
Watkins KE, Marsick VJ (1993) Sculpting the learning organization: lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Wiersema MF (1995) Executive succession as an antecedent to corporate restructuring. Hum Resour Manag 34:185–202
Zajac EJ (1990) CEO selection, succession, compensation, and firm performance: a theoretical integration and empirical evidence. Strateg Manag J 11:217–230
Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2004) When the known devil is better than an unknown God: an empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Acad Manag J 47:483–500
Zhang Y, Rajagopalan N (2010) Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 31(3):334–346
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodall, A.H., Bäker, A. (2015). A Theory Exploring How Expert Leaders Influence Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations. In: Welpe, I., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Incentives and Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09784-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09785-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)