Skip to main content

Goodness-of-Fit Methods for Nonparametric IRT Models

  • Conference paper
Quantitative Psychology Research

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 140))

Abstract

This chapter has three sections. The first section introduces the unidimensionalmonotone latent variable model for data collected by means of a test or a questionnaire. The second section discusses the use of goodness-of-fit methods for statistical models, in particular, item response models such as theunidimensional monotone latent variable model. The third section discusses the use of the conditional association property for testing the goodness-of-fit of the unidimensional monotone latent variable model. It is established that conditional association is well suited for assessing the local independence assumption and a procedure is proposed for identifying locally independent sets of items. The procedure is used in a real-data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • De Koning, E., Sijtsma, K., & Hamers, J. H. M. (2002). Comparing four IRT models when analyzing two tests for inductive reasoning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 302–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J., Kim, H., Habing, B., & Gao, F. (1998). Investigating local dependence with conditional covariance functions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glas, C. A. W., & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Their foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 69–96). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1980). The Adjective Check List, manual 1980 edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D. A. (1988). Two-group classification in latent trait theory: Scores with monotone likelihood ratio. Psychometrika, 53, 383–392.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I. W., & Junker, B. W. (1997). Stochastic ordering using the latent trait and the sum score in polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika, 62, 331–347.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523–1543.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ligtvoet, R., Van der Ark, L. A., Te Marvelde, J. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2010). Investigating an invariant item ordering for polytomously scored items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague, The Netherlands/Berlin, Germany: Mouton/De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R. J., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (1988). Item bundles. Psychometrika, 53, 349–359.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, N., Wang, X., & Ramsay, J. O. (2002). Nonparametric item response function estimates with the EM algorithm. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K. (2003). Developments in practical nonparametric IRT scale analysis. In H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigemasu, Y. Kano, & J. J. Meulman (Eds.), New developments in psychometrics (pp. 183–190). Tokyo, Japan: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). Nonparametric item response theory and related topics. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics. Vol. 26, Psychometrics (pp. 719–746). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K., Meijer, R. R., & Van der Ark, L. A. (2011). Mokken scale analysis as time goes by: An update for scaling practitioners. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Straat, J. H., Van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). Comparing optimization algorithms for item selection in Mokken scale analysis. Journal of Classification, 30, 72–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straat, J. H., Van der Ark, L. A., & Sijtsma, K. (2014). Using conditional association to identify locally independent item sets (Manuscript submitted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijmstra, J., Hessen, D. J., Van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). Testing manifest monotonicity using order-constrained statistical inference. Psychometrika, 78, 83–97.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ark, L. A. (2005). Stochastic ordering of the latent trait by the sum score under various polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika, 70, 283–304.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ark, L. A. (2012). New developments in Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(5), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ark, L. A., & Bergsma, W. P. (2010). A note on stochastic ordering of the latent trait using the sum of polytomous item scores. Psychometrika, 75, 272–279.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997a). Item response theory: Brief history, common models, and extensions. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (1997b). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Stout, W. F. (1999). The theoretical DETECT index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure. Psychometrika, 64, 213–249.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaas Sijtsma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

R code we used for the real-data example.

R> library("CAprocedure")

R> library("mokken")

R> data(acl)

R> # Achievement

R> Ach <- acl[, 11 : 20]

R> coefH(Ach)

R> apply(Ach, 2, mean)

R> CAP(Ach, TRUE)

R> # Nurturance

R> Nur <- acl[, 61 : 70] #

R> coefH(Nur)

R> apply(Nur, 2, mean)

R> CAP(Nur, TRUE)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sijtsma, K., Straat, J.H., van der Ark, L.A. (2015). Goodness-of-Fit Methods for Nonparametric IRT Models. In: van der Ark, L., Bolt, D., Wang, WC., Douglas, J., Chow, SM. (eds) Quantitative Psychology Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 140. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19977-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics