Abstract
Educational quality is a recurrent theme in the Dutch Vocational and Educational Training (VET) sector. Given the major transformations in school governance and the increased autonomy of schools and school boards, it is important to address whether schools and school boards are able to improve educational quality if needed. Policy documents and the working methods of the Inspectorate build upon the assumption that schools with a board that is in control are able to do so. In this chapter we discuss this assumption using literature about intra-organizational management. On the basis of this literature we show that the rational approach and narrow idea about top-down steering and the positive effects of a board that is in control might be too optimistic. Moreover, we discuss the implications of the multi-layered and loosely coupled structure of ROCs for school governance and board control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biesta, G. J. J. (2008). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
Braithwaite, J., Makkai, T., & Braithwaite, V. (2007). Regulating aged care: Ritualism and the new pyramid. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bronneman-Helmers, R. (2011). Overheid en onderwijsbeleid. Beleidsvorming rond het Nederlandse onderwijsstelsel (1990–2010). Den Haag, The Netherlands: SCP.
Bryk, A., & Driscoll, M. E. (1985). An empirical investigation of the school as community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clarke, L., & Winch, C. (2007). Introduction. In L. Clarke & C. Winch (Eds.), Vocational education: International approaches, developments and systems. London: Routledge.
Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.
Commissie Oudeman. (2010). Naar meer focus op het mbo! Den Haag, The Netherlands: Ministerie van Onderwijs Cultuur en Wetenschap.
Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2010). A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 111–138.
De Heus, R. S., & Stremmelaar, M. T. L. (2000). Auditen van soft controls. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Dutch Council of Education. (2013). Publieke belangen dienen. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Onderwijsraad.
Dutch Education Council. (2006). Hoe kan governance in het onderwijs verder vorm krijgen? Den Haag, The Netherlands: Onderwijsraad.
Dutch Education Council. (2007). Leraarschap is eigenaarschap. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Onderwijsraad.
Ehren, M. C. M., & Honingh, M. E. (2012). Risk-based school inspections in the Netherlands: A critical reflection on intended effects and causal mechanisms. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(4), 239–248.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Paradoxes of public sector service. Governance, 14, 55–73.
Geijsel, F. (2015). Onderwijsleiderschap vereist wijsheid in de praktijk. Amsterdam: Nederlandse School voor Onderwijsmanagement (NSO) (Oratie).
Hallinger, P. (1989). What makes a difference? School context, principal leadership and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
Hanson, E. M. (2001). Educational administration and organizational behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., Gray, J. M., & Daly, P. (2004). Institutional context of education systems in Europe. A cross-country comparison of quality and equity. Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Honingh, M. E., & Karstanje, P. N. (2007). Aansturen op zelfsturen in het onderwijs. Bestuurskunde, 16(4), 41–48.
Honingh, M. E., & Karsten, S. (2007). Marketization in the Dutch vocational education and training sector: Hybrids and their behaviour. Public Management Review, 91(1), 135–143.
Honingh, M. E., & van Thiel, S. (2014). Kwaliteit als sleutel tot overheidsinterventie: Een reflectie op de beleidsassumpties van autonomievergroting in het primair onderwijs. Bestuurskunde, 23(1), 18–26.
Hooge, E. (2013). Besturing van autonomie. Over de mythe van bestuurbare onderwijsorganisaties. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Universiteit van Tilburg (Oratie).
Hooge, E. H., Nusink, F., & Van der Sluis, M. E. (2006). Zicht op intern toezicht; theorie en praktijk van toezicht in de bve-sector, MGK-rapport 06–80. Amsterdam: Max Goote Kenniscentrum bve.
Inspectorate of Education (2010a). Risicoanalyse: Risico’s in beeld. [Risk-based school inspections: Identifying risks]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Inspectorate of Education. (2010b). Besturing en Onderwijskwaliteit in het MBO. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Inspectorate of Education. (2011). 2012 Supervision framework for vocational and adult education (BVE). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Inspectorate of Education. (2012). De staat van het onderwijs. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Inspectorate of Education. (2013). De staat van het onderwijs. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Janssens, F. J. G., & De Wolf, I. (2009). Analyzing the assumptions of a policy program: An ex-ante evaluation of “educational governance” in the Netherlands. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 411–425.
Kaptein, M. (2007). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model, Erim report series research in management, ERS-2007-084-ORG. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Erasmus University.
Karsten, S. (1999). Neoliberal education reform in the Netherlands. Comparative Education, 35(3), 303–317.
Koretz, D. M. (2002). Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators’ productivity. The Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 752–777.
Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 229–278.
Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2011). Mores leren: Soft controls in corporate governance. Oratie. Breukelen, The Netherlands: Nyenrode Business University.
MBO Newspaper. (2015). Dertig MBO-opleidingen zeer zwak. Retrieved on July 4, 2015, from http://mbo-today.nl/dertig-mbo-opleidingen-zeer-zwak
MBO Raad. (2014). Branchecode Goed Bestuur Mbo. Woerden, The Netherlands: MBO Raad.
Meyer, H. D., & Rowan, B. (Eds.). (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Meyer, M., & Gupta, V. (1994). The performance paradox. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 309–369.
Ministry of Education and Science. (1991). Hoofdlijnennotitie ROC’s: een notitie over de vorming van regionale opleidingencentra. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Staatsuitgeverij.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Newmann, F. M., King, B., & Rigdon, M. (1996). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools (Deliverable to OERI). Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
Petit, R., Van Esch, W., Van de Venne, L., & Groenenberg, R. (2012). Leren of profileren? De Mbo Benchmark. In Meso Magazine, 185.
Powell, W. W., & Dimaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Power, M. (1997). The audity society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 459–480.
Saatcioglu, A., Moore, S., Sargut, G., & Bajaj, A. (2012). The role of school board social capital in district governance: Effects on financial and academic outcomes. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(1), 1–42.
Simons, R. J. (2001). Kwaliteitszorg in het onderwijs: De ‘wil tot kwaliteit’ in een gewijzigd veld van bestuurlijkheid. Pedagogiek, 21(2), 106–123.
Spillane, J. P., & Seashore Louis, K. (2002). School improvement processes and practices: Professional learning for building instructional capacity. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101(1), 83–104.
Staatsblad. (1995). Wettekst Wet Educatie en Beroepsonderwijs. Nr 501.
Stichting Kennisnet. (2013). Het teamperspectef. Informatie voor teams in het mbo. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Stichting Kennisnet.
Ten Bruggencate, G. C. (2009). Maken schoolleiders het verschil? Onderzoek naar de invloed van schoolleiders op de schoolresultaten. Academisch proefschrift. Universiteit Twente, Enschede.
Thomsen, M., & Van de Venne, L. (2012). Goed bestuur in het mbo. Vorderingen in de implementatie van de Code Goed Bestuur in de bve-sector. Den Bosch/Utrecht, The Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Beroepsonderwijs (Ecbo).
Timmermans, A. C., Bosker, R. J., Doolaard, S., & De Wolf, I. (2012). Value added as an indicator of educational effectiveness in Dutch senior secondary vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(4), 417–432.
Van de Venne, L., Hermanussen, J., Honingh, M., & Van Genugten, M. (2014). De dagelijkse zorg voor onderwijskwaliteit in het mbo. Bouwstenen voor een aanpak. Den Bosch, The Netherlands: Expertisecentrum beroepsonderwijs (Ecbo).
Van de Venne, L., & Petit, R. (2010). Van postbode tot regisseur. De horizontale dialoog in het mbo. Den Bosch/Utrecht, The Netherlands: Expertisecentrum beroepsonderwijs (Ecbo).
Van der Sluis, M., Reezigt, J., & Borgans, L. (2013). Quantifying stakeholders values of VET provisions in the Netherlands. Vocations and Learning. doi:10.1007/s12186-013-9104-6.
Van Esch, W., & Teelken, C. (2008). Veranderingen in de sturingsbalans tussen overheid en bve-instellingen. In W. Houtkoop, S. Karsten, & A. M. L. van Wieringen (Eds.), Controverse en perspectief in het beroepsonderwijs (pp. 313–332). Antwerpen,Belgium/Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: Garant.
Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performances paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281.
Visscher, A., & Hendriks, M. (2009). Improving quality assurance in European vocational and educational training: Factors influencing the use of quality assurance. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, J. G. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspection and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van de Venne, L., Honingh, M., van Genugten, M. (2017). Improvement of Educational Quality in VET: Who Is Next?. In: de Bruijn, E., Billett, S., Onstenk, J. (eds) Enhancing Teaching and Learning in the Dutch Vocational Education System. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50734-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50734-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50732-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50734-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)