Abstract
E. Thomas Lawson and Robert McCauley’s “ritual form hypothesis” appeals to a cognitive mechanism—an “action representation system”—to explain (predict) patterns in human reasoning about three classes of religious ritual. Our attempt to test their theory’s predictions using a sample of traditional Chinese rituals, as described to us by contemporary practitioners/observers, led to three discoveries. First, “special patient” rituals strongly conformed to all theory predictions, thereby replicating findings from previous studies conducted in the United States and Singapore. Second, some “special agent” rituals contradicted theory predictions, replicating findings from the aforementioned United States study. Third, our study produced few special agent rituals and no special instrument rituals; we interpret this paucity of representation in two of three ritual classes in light of McCauley and Lawson’s notion of “ritual imbalance.” These combined findings partially support Lawson and McCauley’s theory and also illuminate how China’s unique religious history may have engendered an over-emphasis on special patient rituals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9.
Barrett, J. L. (2004). Bringing data to mind: Empirical claims of Lawson and McCauley’s theory of religious ritual. In T. Light & B. C. Wilson (Eds.), Religion as a human capacity: A festschrift in honor of E. Thomas (pp. 265–288). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
Barrett, J. L., & Lawson, E. T. (2001). Ritual intuitions: Cognitive contributions to judgments of ritual efficacy. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(2), 183–201.
Hornbeck, R. G., Bentley, B., & Barrett, J. L. (2015). Examining special patient rituals in a Chinese cultural context: A research report. Journal for Cognition and Culture, 15(5), 530–541. doi:10.1163/15685373-12342164.
Lawson, E. T., & McCauley, R. N. (1990). Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Malley, B., & Barrett, J. L. (2003). Can ritual form be predicted from religious belief? A test of the Lawson-McCauley hypotheses. Journal of Ritual Studies, 17(2), 1–14.
McCauley, R. N., & Lawson, E. T. (2002). Bringing ritual to mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Whitehouse, H. (1995). Inside the cult: Religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barrett, J.L., Hornbeck, R.G., Bleeker, B.D., Barrett, S.T., Hao, C. (2017). Ritual Imbalance in Contemporary China: A Ritual Form Theory Analysis. In: Hornbeck, R., Barrett, J., Kang, M. (eds) Religious Cognition in China. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62954-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62954-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62952-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62954-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)