Skip to main content

Using Sound to Enhance Taste Experiences: An Overview

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bridging People and Sound (CMMR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10525))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present an overview of the recent research conducted by the first author of this article, in which the influence of sound on the perception of taste/flavor in beer is evaluated. Three studies in total are presented and discussed. These studies assessed how people match different beers with music and the influence that the latter can have on the perception and enjoyment of the beers. In general, the results revealed that in certain contexts sound can modulate the perceived strength and taste attributes of the beer as well as its associated hedonic experience. We conclude by discussing the potential mechanisms behind these taste-flavor/sound interactions, and the implications of these studies in the context of multisensory food and drink experience design. We suggest that future work may also build on cognitive neuroscience. In particular, such an approach may complement our understanding of the underlying brain mechanisms of auditory/gustatory interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By taste we refer to the basic components that are mostly captured by the tongue (sweetness, saltiness, bitterness, sourness and umami). Flavor, on the other hand, is a more complex experience that also involves, at least, retro nasal olfaction.

  2. 2.

    Link to the songs http://sonicseasoningbeer.tumblr.com/ (retrieved on March, 2016).

  3. 3.

    See http://www.editorsofficial.com/ (retrieved November 2015).

  4. 4.

    Link to the song - https://play.spotify.com/track/4yVv19QPf9WmaAmYWOrdfr?play=true&utm_source=open.spotify.com&utm_medium=open (retrieved January 2016).

  5. 5.

    For example, in [17]’s Table 1 - which summarizes the results of a number of studies carried out by different research groups - high spectral balance, staccato articulation, syncopated rhythm, high pitch, among others, are musical/psychoacoustic elements that correspond to sourness. Furthermore, due to the predominant piano in the second verse, the song might also be expected to have an effect on the perceived levels of sweetness.

  6. 6.

    83% of the participants reported knowing TBP (N = 191). When asked how often the participants consumed products from TBP - on a 7 point scale, with 1 corresponding to ‘never’ and 7 to ‘very often’ - the mean of their answers was 3.30 (SD 1.80). Note that, since the vast majority of the participants reported knowing TBP, in this study it was not possible to include in our data analysis control for familiarity of the beer’s brand.

  7. 7.

    A few quick notes on how chocolate works in the brain were reviewed from both of the following links. http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/emotions/chocolate-high2.htm and http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/chocolate-dopamine-3660.html (retrieved on February, 2016); see [24] for a review on mood state effects of chocolate.

  8. 8.

    Important to note here that arousal and valence are the most common ways to characterize changes in emotions. In other words, the relation between high/low arousal and positive/negative valence are used to define an emotional state.

References

  1. Astolfi, A., Filippi, M.: Good acoustical quality in restaurants: a compromise between speech intelligibility and privacy. In: Proceedings 18th International Congress on Acoustics ICA 2004, Kyoto, pp. 1201–1204 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blood, A.J., Zatorre, R.J.: Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98(20), 11818–11823 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calvert, G.A., Thesen, T.: Multisensory integration: methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. J. Physiol.-Paris 98(1), 191–205 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Y.C., Spence, C.: When hearing the bark helps to identify the dog: semantically-congruent sounds modulate the identification of masked pictures. Cognition 114(3), 389–404 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheskin, L.: Marketing success: how to achieve it. Cahners Books, Boston (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collier, G.L.: Affective synesthesia: extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli. Motiv. Emot. 20(1), 1–32 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deneve, S., Pouget, A.: Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links. J. Physiol.-Paris 98(1), 249–258 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deroy, O., Crisinel, A.S., Spence, C.: Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20(5), 878–896 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doehrmann, O., Naumer, M.J.: Semantics and the multisensory brain: how meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration. Brain Res. 1242, 136–150 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elder, R.S., Mohr, G.S.: The crunch effect: food sound salience as a consumption monitoring cue. Food Qual. Prefer. 51, 39–46 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferber, C., Cabanac, M.: Influence of noise on gustatory affective ratings and preference for sweet or salt. Appetite 8(3), 229–235 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiegel, A., Meullenet, J.F., Harrington, R.J., Humble, R., Seo, H.S.: Background music genre can modulate flavor pleasantness and overall impression of food stimuli. Appetite 76, 144–152 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frandsen, L.W., Dijksterhuis, G.B., Brockhoff, P.B., Nielsen, J.H., Martens, M.: Feelings as a basis for discrimination: comparison of a modified authenticity test with the same–different test for slightly different types of milk. Food Qual. Prefer. 18(1), 97–105 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heath, T.P., Melichar, J.K., Nutt, D.J., Donaldson, L.F.: Human taste thresholds are modulated by serotonin and noradrenaline. J. Neurosci. 26(49), 12664–12671 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heylighen, A., Rychtáriková, M., Vermeir, G.: Designing spaces for every listener. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9(3), 283–292 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantono, K., Hamid, N., Shepherd, D., Yoo, M.J., Carr, B.T., Grazioli, G.: The effect of background music on food pleasantness ratings. Psychol. Music 44(5), 1111–1125 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kantono, K., Hamid, N., Shepherd, D., Yoo, M.J.Y., Grazioli, G., Carr, T.B.: Listening to music can influence hedonic and sensory perceptions of gelati. Appetite 100, 244–255 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knoeferle, K., Spence, C.: Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 992–1006 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Yik, M., Koval, P., Coosemans, J., Zeng, K.J., Russell, J.A.: The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience varies with personality and culture. J. Pers. 85(4), 530–542 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luckett, C.R., Meullenet, J.F., Seo, H.S.: Crispness level of potato chips affects temporal dynamics of flavor perception and mastication patterns in adults of different age groups. Food Qual. Prefer. 51, 8–19 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marks, L.E.: The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities. Academic Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Marks, L.E.: On perceptual metaphors. Metaphor Symb. 11(1), 39–66 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parise, C.V., Spence, C.: When birds of a feather flock together: synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS One 4(5), e5664 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parker, G., Parker, I., Brotchie, H.: Mood state effects of chocolate. J. Affect. Disord. 92(2), 149–159 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pollatos, O., Kopietz, R., Linn, J., Albrecht, J., Sakar, V., Anzinger, A., Wiesmann, M.: Emotional stimulation alters olfactory sensitivity and odor judgment. Chem. Senses 32(6), 583–589 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Touhafi, A.: T.A.S.T.E. Testing auditory solutions towards the improvement of the tasting experience. In: Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research. Marseille, pp. 795–805. Publications of L.M.A (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Rychtarikova, M., Touhafi A., Steenhaut, K., Persoone, D., Spence, C. Leman, M.: Does music influence de Multisensory tasting experience? J. Sens. Stud. 30(5), 404–412 (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Rychtarikova, M., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., Persoone, D., Spence, C.: Using sound-taste correspondences to enhance the subjective value of tasting experiences. Front. Psychol. 6,1309 (2015b)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Van Ee, R., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., Leman, M., Rychtarikova, M.: Assessing multisensory tasting experiences by means of customized sonic cues. In: Proceedings of Euronoise 2015, Maastricht, vol. 352, pp. 1–6 (2015c)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Wang, Q.J., Steenhaut, K., Van Ee, R., Spence, C.: Tune that beer! Finding the pitch corresponding to the Taste of Belgian Bitter Beers (submitted A)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Wang, Q. J., Van Ee, R., Spence, C.: The influence of soundscapes on the perception and evaluation of beers. Food Qual. Prefer. 52, 32–41 (2016a)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reinoso Carvalho, F., Velasco, C., Van Ee, R., Leboeuf, Y., Spence C.: Music influences hedonic and taste ratings in beer. Front. Psychol. 7 (2016b)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Salimpor, V.N., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., Zatorre, R.J.: Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nat. Neurosci. 14(2), 257–262 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Satpute, A., Kang, J., Bickart, K., Yardley, H., Wager, T., Barrett, L.F.: Involvement of sensory regions in affective experience: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seo, H.S., Hummel, T.: Influence of auditory cues on chemosensory perception. In: Guthrie, B., Beauchamp, J.D., Buettner, A., Lavine, B.K. (eds.) The Chemical Sensory Informatics of Food: Measurement, Analysis, Integration, pp. 41–56. ACS Symposium Series (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shepherd, G.M.: Smell images and the flavour system in the human brain. Nature 444(7117), 316–321 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Small, D.M.: Flavor is in the brain. Physiol. Behav. 107(4), 540–552 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spence, C.: Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73(4), 971–995 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Spence, C.: Auditory contributions to flavour perception and feeding behaviour. Physiol. Behav. 107(4), 505–515 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Spence, C.: Noise and its impact on the perception of food and drink. Flavor 3, 9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Spence, C.: Eating with our ears: assessing the importance of the sounds of consumption to our perception and enjoyment of multisensory flavour experiences. Flavor, 4, 3 (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Spence, C.: Multisensory flavor perception. Cell 161(1), 24–35 (2015b)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spence, C., Michel, C., Smith, B.: Airplane noise and the taste of umami. Flavor 3, 2 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Spence, C., Shankar, M.U.: The influence of auditory cues on the perception of, and responses to, food and drink. J. Sens. Stud. 25, 406–430 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Spence, C., Piqueras-Fiszman, B.: The Perfect Meal: The Multisensory Science of Food and Dining. Wiley, Oxford (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Spence, C., Richards, L., Kjellin, E., Huhnt, A.-M., Daskal, V., Scheybeler, A., Velasco, C., Deroy, O.: Looking for crossmodal correspondences between classical music and fine wine. Flavor 2, 29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Spence, C., Wang, Q.J.: Wine and music (II): can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound. Flavor 4(1), 1–14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stafford, L.D., Fernandes, M., Agobiani, E.: Effects of noise and distraction on alcohol perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 24(1), 218–224 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stein, B.E., Stanford, T.R., Ramachandran, R., Perrault Jr., T.J., Rowland, B.A.: Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness. Exp. Brain Res. 198(2–3), 113–126 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Velasco, C., Woods, A.T., Petit, O., Cheok, A.D., Spence, C.: Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: a review. Food Qual. Prefer. 52, 17–26 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, Q.J., Woods, A., Spence, C.: “What’s your taste in music?” A comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes. i-Perception 6, 6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wesson, D.W., Wilson, D.A.: Smelling sounds: olfactory–auditory sensory convergence in the olfactory tubercle. J. Neurosci. 30(8), 3013–3021 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wilkins, R.W., Hodges, D.A., Laurienti, P.J., Steen, M., Burdette, J.H.: Network science and the effects of music preference on functional brain connectivity: from Beethoven to Eminem. Sci. Rep. 4, 6130 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Woods, A.T., Poliakoff, E., Lloyd, D.M., Kuenzel, J., Hodson, R., Gonda, H., Batchelor, J., Dijksterhuis, A., Thomas, A.: Effect of background noise on food perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 22(1), 42–47 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zampini, M., Spence, C.: The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. J. Sens. Stud. 19(5), 347–363 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Reinoso Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reinoso Carvalho, F., Touhafi, A., Steenhaut, K., van Ee, R., Velasco, C. (2017). Using Sound to Enhance Taste Experiences: An Overview. In: Aramaki, M., Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S. (eds) Bridging People and Sound. CMMR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10525. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67738-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67738-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67737-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67738-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics