Skip to main content

Are Right-Wing Populist Parties a Threat to Democracy?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy and Crisis

Abstract

Whether right-wing populist parties pose a threat or a corrective for democracies has been a matter of extensive theoretical debate. This chapter examines the effect these parties exert on democratic quality by means of a comparative quantitative analysis. Focusing on democracies in Western and Eastern Europe, it takes a closer look at democracy’s partial regimes, such as the rule of law, representation, the public sphere, and participation. The results are twofold: First, in line with the theoretical expectations, right-wing populists have a negative effect on democratic quality when they are in government. Second, indirect effects caused by populists’ electoral successes are rare. While the presence of populists enhances participation and aspects of representation, they have a negative influence on the public sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a recent argument to the contrary, see Aslanidis (2016).

  2. 2.

    For the effect of populist radical right parties on socioeconomic issues, see Röth et al. (2017).

  3. 3.

    Moreover, European populists invariably portray themselves as the only “true democrats” (Canovan 2004). In their view, they are the only saviors of democracy against political and economic elites, whom they accuse of betraying “the people” (Albertazzi and Mueller 2013, 345).

  4. 4.

    Due to missing values, Romania before 1995, Croatia before 2000, and Cyprus had to be excluded from the analysis.

  5. 5.

    Cabinets, which were still in office at the end of 2014, were not included in the analysis to ensure case comparability, as we include government duration in the model.

  6. 6.

    The starting year for Hungary is 1990; for Bulgaria and Poland 1991; for Estonia, Lithuania, and Romania 1992; and for the Czech Republic, Latvia, Slovenia, and Slovakia 1993.

  7. 7.

    The appendix includes a complete list of parties coded as right-wing populist. Please note that the Croatian HDZ is coded only until 2000 as right-wing populist.

  8. 8.

    For a more detailed description of the Democracy Barometer, see also Heyne in this volume.

  9. 9.

    In model 1 we only distinguish between no government involvement and any form of involvement, whereas in model 2 we combine minor party in government and government leadership in order to explain the additional explanatory power of a more distinct measurement.

  10. 10.

    Nevertheless, we have computed all models with the vote share data available and did not observe differences in terms of significant effects.

  11. 11.

    All empirical analysis in this paper has been conducted with the statistical software environment R. The syntax used and a prepared dataset are available upon request.

References

  • Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T. (2012). Comparing radical right parties in government: Immigration and integration policies in nine countries (19962010). West European Politics, 35(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T. (2015). Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: A fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades. Party Politics, 21(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T. (2016). The party for freedom: Balancing between mission, votes and office. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 145–168). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T., & de Lange, S. L. (2012). Radical right parties in office: Incumbency records and the electoral cost of governing. Government and Opposition, 47(4), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01375.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Into the mainstream? A comparative analysis of the programmatic profiles of radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe over time. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 31–52). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (Eds.). (2008). Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of western European democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi, D., McDonnell, D., & Newell, J. L. (2011). Di Lotta E Di Governo: The Lega Nord and Rifondazione Comunista in office. Party Politics, 17(4), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811400523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi, D., & Mueller, S. (2013). Populism and liberal democracy: Populists in government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland. Government and Opposition, 48(3), 343–371. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, S., & Claro da Fonseca, S. (2012). Immigration, left and right. Party Politics, 18(6), 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810393265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, B. (2005). Populism as an internal periphery of democratic politics. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 72–98). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 19992010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batory, A. (2016). Populists in government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation”. Democratization, 23(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. N., Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Katz, N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 634–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H.-G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blauberger, M., & Kelemen, R. D. (2017). Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1229357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, N., Lidén, G., & Nyhlén, J. (2014). Do anti-immigration parties matter? The case of the Sweden democrats and local refugee policy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J. (2010). Kausalanalyse mit Paneldaten. In H. Best & C. Wolf (Eds.), Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse (pp. 963–994). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W., Müller, L., & Weßels, B. (2012). The democracy barometer: A new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. European Political Science, 11(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, S. L. (2007). A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics, 13(4), 411–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, S. L. (2012). New alliances: Why mainstream parties govern with radical right-wing populist parties. Political Studies, 60(4), 899–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00947.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, F. (Ed.). (2006). Populismus: Gefahr für die Demokratie oder nützliches Korrektiv? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fomina, J., & Kucharczyk, J. (2016). Populism and protest in Poland. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, M. (2016). Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotz, F., & Müller-Rommel, F. (2015). Schwache Regierungschefs? Politische Erfahrung und Amtsdauer von Premierministern in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 46(2), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2015-2-310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gschwend, T., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2007). Research design in political science: How to practice what they preach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guérot, U. (2017). Der neue Bürgerkrieg: das offene Europa und seine Feinde. Berlin: Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinisch, R. (2003). Success in opposition failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics, 26(3), 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinisch, R., & Hauser, K. (2016). The mainstreaming of the Austrian freedom party: The more things change. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 73–93). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillen, S., & Steiner, N. D. (2017). Left-authoritarians and voter turnout in West European countries. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2947782. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.

  • Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2015). Friend or foe? Testing the influence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America: Friend or foe? Populism and democracy. Political Studies, n/a–n/a. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12219. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9248.12219. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.

  • Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2016). A drunken guest in Europe?: The influence of populist radical right parties on democratic quality. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 10(2), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-016-0302-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-Nots and cultural backlash. HKS Working Paper No, RWP16-026. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2818659. Accessed 12 Sept 2017

  • Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe?: Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005a). On populist reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005b). Populism: What’s in a name? In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 32–47). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, M. (2012). Rechtspopulismus als Herausforderung für die Demokratie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In T. Mörschel & C. Krell (Eds.), Demokratie in Deutschland (pp. 389–411). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacRea, D., & Gellner, E. (1969). Populism as an ideology. In G. Ionescu (Ed.), Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics (pp. 153–164). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowski, R. (2016). The polish parliamentary election of 2015: A free and fair election that results in unfair political consequences. West European Politics, 39(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1177305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, O. (2016). Staying away from the mainstream: The case of the Swiss People’s party. In T. Akkerman, S. L. de Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 193–207). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W., Bochsler, D., Bousbah, K., Bühlmann, M., Giebler, H., Hänni, M., Heyne, L., Müller, L., Ruth, S., & Weßels, B. (2016). Democracy barometer. Methodology. Version 5. Aarau: Zentrum für Demokratie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Thinking in action. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C., & Wagner, E. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2013). Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what? European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2017). Introduction to the populist radical right. In C. Mudde (Ed.), The populist radical right: A reader (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism: Corrective and threat to democracy. In C. Mudde & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? (pp. 205–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). Was ist populismus? Ein Essay. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Grömping, M. (2017). Populist Threats to electoral integrity: The year in elections, 2016-2017. HKS Working Paper No. RWP17-018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2965729. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.

  • Otjes, S., & Louwerse, T. (2015). Populists in parliament: Comparing left-wing and right-wing populism in the Netherlands: Populists in parliament. Political Studies, 63(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, F. (2005). Populism and the mirror of democracy—introduction. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedahzur, A., & Weinberg, L. (2001). Modern European democracy and its enemies: The threat of the extreme right. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 2(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röth, L., Afonso, A., & Spies, D. C. (2017). The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review, published online: 13 June 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000133.

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2011). Populismus in vergleichender Perspektive. Berliner Debatte Initial, 22(1), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C., & Taggart, P. (2016). Dealing with populists in government: A framework for analysis. Democratization, 23(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1058785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review, 5, 1), 1–1),26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schain, M. A. (2006). The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: Measuring direct and indirect effects. West European Politics, 29(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380500512619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B. (2016). Confrontation by default and confrontation by design: Strategic and institutional responses to Poland’s populist coalition government. Democratization, 23(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1058782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A., & Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: Revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 62–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781403920072.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tännsjö, T. (1992). Populist democracy: A defence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Khomenko, A., & Svensson, R. (2017). QoG standard dataset 2017. The quality of government institute, University of Gothenburg. doi: https://doi.org/10.18157/QoGStdJan17.

  • Treib, O. (2014). The voter says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1541–1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.941534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hauwaert, S. M., & Van Kessel, S. (2017). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, first published 8 June 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216.

  • Van Kessel, S. (2015). Populist parties in Europe: Agents of discontent? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Spanje, J. (2010). Contagious parties anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5), 563–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, B., & Zaslove, A. (2016). Italy: A case of mutating populism? Democratization, 23(2), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A., Lewandowsky, M., & Giebler, H. (2015). Alles neu macht der Mai? In M. Kaeding & N. Switek (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2014 (pp. 137–148). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2013). “Anything goes”—the Haiderization of Europe. In R. Wodak, M. Khosravinik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Rightwing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 23–38). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2010). Party government in 48 democracies (1945–1998): Composition, duration, personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). World development indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 23 May 2017.

  • WZB. (2017). Databank “elections, parties, governments” of the research unit “democracy and democratization”. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Spittler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Right-wing populist parties

Country

Initials

Party name

Years included (first and last election results recognized)

Austria

FPÖ

Freedom Party of Austria

1990–2013

BZÖ

Alliance for the Future of Austria

2006–2013

Belgium

VB

Flemish Interest

1991–2014

FN/NF

National Front

1991–2010

Bulgaria

Ataka

Attack Coalition

2005–2014

Croatia

HDZ

Croatian Democratic Union

1990–2000

HSP

Croatian Party of Rights

1992–1995

HSP/ZDS

Croatian Party of Rights/Zagorje Democratic Party

2003

HSP AS

Croatian Party of Rights Dr. Ante Starcevic

2011

Czech Republic

SPR-RSC

Rally for the Republic – Republican Party of Czechoslovakia

1992–2010

Úsvit

Dawn of Direct Democracy

2013

Denmark

DF

Danish People’s Party

1998–2011

Estonia

ERSP

Estonian National Independence Party

1992

EK

Estonian Citizens Coalition

1992

Finland

PS

True Finns

1991–2011

France

FN

National Front

1993–2012

Great Britain

UKIP

United Kingdom Independence Party

1997–2010

Greece

LAOS

Popular Orthodox Rally

2007–2012

Hungary

FIDESZ-MPP

Fidesz-Hungarian Civic Union

1990–2014

MIéP

Hungarian Justice and Life Party

1994–1998

Jobbik

The Movement for a Better Hungary

2010–2014

Italy

LV

Venetian League

1992–2001

LN

Northern League-Federal Italy

1992–2013

Casa

House of Freedom

1994–2001

MS

Social Movement-Flame Tricolore

1996–2006

FI

Forward Italy

2006

M5S

Five Star Movement

2013

Latvia

TB

Union For Homeland and Freedom

1993–1995

NA

National Alliance “All For Latvia!”—“For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK”

2010–2014

Netherlands

CD

Centre Democrats

1994–1998

LPF

List Pim Fortuyn

2002–2003

PVV

Party for Freedom

2006–2012

Poland

PX

Party X

1991

KPN

Confederation for Independent Poland

1991–1993

ROP

Movement for Rebuilding Poland

1997

PiS

Law and Justice

2001–2011

LPR

League of Polish Families

2001–2007

Romania

PUNR

Party of Romanian National Unity

1992–1996

PRM

Greater Romania Party

1992–2008

Slovakia

SNS

Slovak National Party

1990–2010

OLaNO

Ordinary People and Independent Personalities

2012

Slovenia

SNS

Slovenian National Party

1996–2008

Sweden

NyD

New Democracy

1991–1998

SD

Sweden Democrats

1991–2014

Switzerland

SD

Swiss Democrats

1991–2007

FPS

Freedom Party

1991–2003

SVP/UDC

Swiss People’s Party

1991–2011

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spittler, M. (2018). Are Right-Wing Populist Parties a Threat to Democracy?. In: Merkel, W., Kneip, S. (eds) Democracy and Crisis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72559-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics