Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meaningful Access for Students: A Petersian Account of Educational Inclusion

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Philosophy of Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 4545 Accesses

Abstract

Educational inclusion remains an area of controversy. While there is a strong moral consensus that children ought to experience a meaningful education irrespective of their ability, the application of this inclusive moral commitment to substantive questions of educational policy and teacher practice remains contentious. In this chapter I argue that the debate over educational inclusion is informed by two rival concepts of education and that the analysis of education foregrounded by the philosopher R.S. Peters can be applied in order to develop a more nuanced account of meaningful access for all students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion of some of the possible unjust consequences arising from the decision see Charney and Kraicer (2012).

  2. 2.

    For one perfectionist account of distributive justice see Kupperman (1987).

  3. 3.

    Shakespeare, or whatever culturally significant achievements are relevant to the community in question. My point is not to outline a particular perfectionist curriculum but to show how a perfectionist concept of education has implications for what counts as meaningful access to education.

  4. 4.

    See also Hirst (1965).

  5. 5.

    When Peters talks about the ‘educated person’ it is better to read him as trying to develop an ideal conception of the person in order to draw out those criteria that define an educationally worthwhile process, not to establish what counts as an educated person.

  6. 6.

    Anyone with a further interest in Peters’ account of education should treat Jane Roland Martin’s critique (1981) as essential reading.

References

  • Charney, R. E., & Kraicer, S. (2012). Moore v. British Columbia: A good idea?. Supreme court law review 63. Moore v. British Columbia (Ministry of Education), 2012 S.C.J.C. NO. 61, 2012 3 S.C.R. 360 (S.C.C).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuypers, S. E. (2012). RS Peters’ ‘the justification of education’ revisited. Ethics and Education, 7(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. H. (1965). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. Philosophical analysis and education, 2, 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, J. (1987). Perfectionism and educational policy. Public Affairs Quarterly, 1(1), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladenson, R. F. (2003). Inclusion and justice in special education. In A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 525–539). Malden: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (1981). The ideal of the educated person. Educational Theory, 31(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2014). Education in a post-metaphysical world: Rethinking educational policy and practice through Jürgen Habermas’ discourse morality. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2016). Education, justice, and discursive agency: Toward an educationally responsive discourse ethics. Educational Theory, 66(6), 735–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1963). Education as initiation. In R. D. Archambault (Ed.), Philosophical analysis and education (pp. 87–111). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1973a). Aims of education — A conceptual inquiry. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 11–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1973b). The justification of education. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 239–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, M. (2010). Special educational needs: A new look. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada

    Christopher Martin

Authors
  1. Christopher Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University and KU Leuven, Ghent, Belgium

    Paul Smeyers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, C. (2018). Meaningful Access for Students: A Petersian Account of Educational Inclusion. In: Smeyers, P. (eds) International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72759-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72761-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation