Abstract
The physical space in which work is undertaken plays a key role in facilitating or inhibiting creativity among workers. The design of the workspace can inspire workers to be creative, facilitate the sharing of knowledge, and support social interaction, which is so important to the creative process. Equally, the workspace design can have an inhibitive effect by isolating individuals, being physically oppressive and being overly prescriptive in usage.
This chapter begins by exploring the history of the office and how the design of the physical space has changed over the last century as the nature of work and organizational cultures have changed. Following this discussion, focus is given to the knowledge workers that occupy such physical spaces today and the different needs that they have from the office to fulfil their role.
The chapter concludes by suggesting how to strike the balance between privacy and collaboration through the workspace design in order to meet the needs of all types of knowledge workers and the requirements of the creativity process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, T. J. (1984). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information with the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allen, T. J., & Henn, G. (2006). The organization and architecture of innovation: Managing the flow of technology. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
Appel-Meulenbroek, R. (2010). Knowledge sharing through co-presence: Added value of facilities. Facilities, 28(3/4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011023140
Bar, M. (2009). A cognitive neuroscience hypothesis of mood and depression. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(11), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.009
Becker, F. D. (2004). Offices at work: Uncommon workspace strategies that add value and improve performance. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Boden, M. A. (1992). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Sphere Books.
Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J., & Naef, R. (2008). Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business. R&D Management, 38(4), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00524.x
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195543
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ceylan, C., Dul, J., & Aytac, S. (2008). Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 18(6), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20128
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Creativity flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Desor, J. A. (1972). Toward a psychological theory of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032112
Dobson, S., & Suckley, L. (2015). ‘A squash and a squeeze’: Managing Spatial Relations in the Office. International Journal of Business Environment, 7(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbe.2015.069011
Duffy, F., & Powell, K. (1997). The new office: With 20 international case histories. London: Octopus Publishing Group.
Eagle, N. (2004). Can serendipity be planned? Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 10–14.
Evans, G. W., Johansson, G., & Carrere, S. (1994). Psychosocial factors and the physical environment: Inter-relations in the workplace. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: John Wiley.
Fayard, A.-L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28(5), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068310
Gladwell, M. (2000). Designs for Working. The New Yorker, December 11.
Gondola, J. C., & Tuckman, B. W. (1985). Effects of a systematic program of exercise on selected measures of creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60(1), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.60.1.53
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
Greene, C., & Myerson, J. (2011). Space for thought: Designing for knowledge workers. Facilities, 29(1/2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111101304
Guildford, J. P. (1960). Alternative uses. Form A. Beverley Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply.
Haner, U.-E. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00347.x
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hsiao, R.-L., Tsai, D.-H., & Lee, C.-F. (2011). Collaborative knowing: The adaptive nature of cross-boundary spanning. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 463–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01024.x
Hua, Y., Loftness, V., Heerwagen, J. H., & Powell, K. M. (2010). Relationship between workplace spatial settings and occupant-perceived support for collaboration. Environment and Behaviour, 43(6), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510364465
Knez, I. (1995). Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90013-6
Knight, A. P., & Baer, M. (2014). Get up, stand up: The effects of a non-sedentary workspace on information elaboration and group performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 910–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614538463
Laing, A. (2006). New patterns of work: The design of the office. In J. Worthington (Ed.), Reinventing the workplace. Burlington, MA: Architectural Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, M., & Moultrie, J. (2005). The organizational innovation laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00327.x
McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1434_11
Netz, Y., Tomer, R., Axelrad, S., Argov, E., & Inbar, O. (2007). The effect of a single aerobic training session on cognitive flexibility in late middle-aged adults. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-924027
Oksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: Investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-04-2013-0136
Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577
Parkin, J. K., Austin, S. A., Pinder, J. A., Baguley, T. S., & Allenby, S. N. (2011). Balancing collaboration and privacy in academic workspaces. Facilities, 29(1/2), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111101313
Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Bajaj, R., Bromberg, J., Congdon, C., Rashid, M., et al. (2007). Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behaviour, 39(6), 815–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297216
Price, I. (2008). Open plan and academe: Pre- and post-hoc conversations. Proceedings of the CIOB W70 conference, edited by E. Finch. Edinburgh.
Rethorst, C. D., Wipfli, B. M., & Landers, D. M. (2009). The antidepressive effects of exercise. Sports Medicine, 39(6), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939060-00004
Slåtten, T., Mehmetoglu, M., Svensson, G., & Sværi, S. (2009). Atmospheric experiences that emotionally touch customers. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 19(6), 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520911005099
Smeds, R. (1997). Organizational learning and innovation through tailored simulation games: Two process re-engineering case studies. Knowledge and Process Management, 4(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1441(199703)4:1<22::aid-kpm84>3.0.co;2-q
Snow, C. P. (2000). The corridors of power. London: House of Stratus.
Stone, N. J., & Irvine, J. M. (1994). Direct or indirect window access, task type, and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80198-7
Suckley, L., & Dobson, S. (2014). Measuring social and spatial relations in an office move. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8851, 478–492.
Sundstrom, E., & Altman, I. (1989). Physical environments and work-group effectiveness. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 11, 175–209.
van de Ven, A., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (2007). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Voordt, T. J. M. (2004). Costs and benefits of flexible workspaces: Work in progress in The Netherlands. Facilities, 22(9/10), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410555959
Wineman, J., Hwang, Y., Kabo, F., Owen-Smith, J., & Davis, G. F. (2014). Spatial layout, social structure, and innovation in organizations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(6), 1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130074p
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Yoder, D., Roethlisberger, F. J., Dickson, W. J., & Wright, H. A. (1940). Management and the worker. Southern Economic Journal, 6(4), 515. https://doi.org/10.2307/1053492
Zhao, Z. J., & Anand, J. (2013). Beyond boundary spanners: The ‘collective bridge’ as an efficient interunit structure for transferring collective knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 1513–1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2080
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suckley, L., Nicholson, J. (2018). Enhancing Creativity Through Workspace Design. In: Martin, L., Wilson, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77350-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77350-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77349-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77350-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)