Skip to main content

When Smartness of a Participatory Learning Ecosystem Should Not Be Interpreted as Mediation by Technology: Case-Study of Golbaf Town, Iran

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Interplay of Data, Technology, Place and People for Smart Learning (SLERD 2018 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 95))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainable development is coined with ongoing social learning processes. As part of a sustainable regional development project in Golbaf town, Iran, development of a participatory community-based learning ecosystem (social learning) was soon found to be a requisite. This in turn was seen to be hampered by lack of social capitals, namely trust, self-confidence and participatoriness.

The interim results of the project indicate the followings as a way towards smartness (survivability) of a participatory learning ecosystem in developing contexts where mistrust, inactiveness and lack of confidence prevail: (1) Facilitating rather than doing by conveners, (2) learning by doing by citizens, and (3) gradual trust formation. It also questions suitability and survivability of highly technology-mediated learning ecosystems in such cases characterised by mistrust and lack of confidence.

The results suggest a progressive approach towards mediation of technologies. In fact, above socio-cultural barriers required us to proceed face-to-face for the regeneration of social capital in order to make the newly-born learning ecosystem survivable and embeddable by time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Loeber, A., van Mierlo, B., Grin, J., Leeuwis, C.: The practical value of theory: conceptualising learning in the pursuit of a sustainable development. In: Social Learning Towards a Sustainable World, pp. 83–98. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Callois, J.-M., Aubert, F.: Towards indicators of social capital for regional development issues: the case of French rural areas. Reg. Stud. 41(6), 809–821 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iyer, S., Kitson, M., Toh, B.: Social capital, economic growth and regional development. Reg. Stud. 39(8), 1015–1040 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harriss, J., De Renzio, P.: POLICY ARENA: ‘Missing link’ or analytically missing? The concept of social capital. Edited by John Harriss. An introductory bibliographic essay. J. Int. Dev. 9(7), 919–937 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wals, A.E.: Social Learning Towards a Sustainable World: Principles, Perspectives, and Praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tilbury, D., Cooke, K.: A national review of environmental education and its contribution to sustainability in Australia: frameworks for sustainability. Department for the Environment and Heritage, and Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jönsson, S., Lukka, K.: Doing interventionist research in management accounting. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goyal, S., Sergi, B.S.: Creating a formal market ecosystem for base of the pyramid markets-strategic choices for social embeddedness. Int. J. Bus. Glob. 15(1), 63–80 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pace, R., Dipace, A., di Matteo, A.: On-site and online learning paths for an educational farm. Pedagogical perspectives for knowledge and social development. Rem-Res. Educ. Media 6(1), 39–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moulaert, F., Nussbaumer, J.: The social region: beyond the territorial dynamics of the learning economy. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 12(1), 45–64 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rizzo, F., Deserti, A., de Pous, M.: Social Innovation Community EU Project. Deliverable 4.1. Report on SIC learning principles and processes (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mealha, Ó.: Citizen-driven dashboards in smart ecosystems: a framework. Interact. Des. Archit. 31, 32–42 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zago, R., Block, T., Dessein, J., Brunori, G., Messely, L.: Citizen participation in neo-endogenous rural development: the case of LEADER programme. In: 6th EAAE Ph.D. Workshop, Co-organized by AIEAA (Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics) and the Department of Economics of Roma Tre University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Markkula, M., Kune, H.: Making smart regions smarter: smart specialization and the role of universities in regional innovation ecosystems. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 5(10) (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dondi, C., Aceto, S., Proli, D.: Learnovation Foresight Report. Foresight Report HAL Id: hal-00592999 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, W., Cha, M.: Government driven partnership for lifelong learning in Korea: a case study of four cities. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 27(5), 579–597 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hibbitt, K., Jones, P., Meegan, R.: Tackling social exclusion: the role of social capital in urban regeneration on Merseyside—from mistrust to trust? Eur. Plan. Stud. 9(2), 141–161 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schicklinski, J.: Civil society actors as drivers of socio-ecological transition?: Green spaces in European cities as laboratories of social innovation. Working Paper No. 102-THEME SSH.2011.1.2-1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peirce, H.J.: The dynamics of learning partnerships: case studies from Queensland. Queensland University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najmoddin Yazdi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maleki, A., Yazdi, N., Jalalvand, M., Tabibzade, S.R. (2019). When Smartness of a Participatory Learning Ecosystem Should Not Be Interpreted as Mediation by Technology: Case-Study of Golbaf Town, Iran. In: Knoche, H., Popescu, E., Cartelli, A. (eds) The Interplay of Data, Technology, Place and People for Smart Learning. SLERD 2018 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92022-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics