Abstract
Self-driving vehicle (SDV) technology, in its current foundational stage, brings about significant uncertainties, indicating a society-wide disruption. In this context, one cannot disentangle envisioning futures with SDVs from questions of (re)distribution of societal benefits and burdens. Contrastingly, the need for strategies to cope with this disruption has recently been recognized through several planning efforts. Despite their fruitfulness, missing an elaborated understanding of technology as a socio-technical phenomenon remains an underlying challenge. However, reclaiming technological futures as plannable spaces requires understanding that human ends are not well-defined or static, and that technology does not have unstoppable, unquestionable, momentum. At the central point of contention, we argue for replacing the language of unintended consequences with the language of unanticipated consequences. Furthermore, we recognize the threat of anticipation inequality if we solely rely on expert-based practices. To support divergent envisioning efforts, we propose a phase of participatory expansion of technological horizons for (un)desirable futures. To this end, we provide an example from an online discussion platform for reflective engagement about mobility futures with SDVs for a neighborhood in the Helsinki capital region. Finally, we reflect on challenges for inter-organizational learning in coping with contingencies.
It is a mistake to confuse progress with a continued movement in one direction.
Wittgenstein
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anon. (n.d.) Bloomberg aspen initiative on cities and autonomous vehicles. Available at: https://avsincities.bloomberg.org. Accessed 1 Dec 2017
Anon. (2016) Federal automated vehicles policy. Available at: https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/AVpolicyguidancePDF.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2017
Auld J, Sokolov V, Stephens TS (2017) Analysis of the effects of connected-automated vehicle technologies on travel demand. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2625:1–8
Banks VA, Stanton NA, Harvey C (2014) Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: hands and feet free but not mind free driving. Saf Sci 62:505–514
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Becker F, Axhausen KW (2017) Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation 44(6):1293–1306
Bergmann S, Sager T (2008) The ethics of mobilities: rethinking place, exclusion, freedom and environment. Ashgate, Farnham
Blyth PL, Mladenovic MN, Nardi BA et al (2016) Expanding the design horizon for self-driving vehicles: distributing benefits and burdens. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 35(3):44–49
Haldor B, Myklebust S, Myrvang C, Sejersted F (2002) The democratic challenge to capitalism: management and democracy in the Nordic Countries, 1st ed. Copenhagen Business School Press
Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Hanna JP (2016) Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 94:243–254
Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. Open University Press, London
Connell DJ (2009) Planning and its orientation to the future. Int Plan Stud 14(1):85–98
Docherty I, Marsden G, Anable J (2017) The governance of smart mobility. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012
Fagnant D, Kockelman K (2015) Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 77:167–181
Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 40:1–13
Fraedrich E, Beiker S, Lenz B (2015) Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility. Eur J Futur Res 3(1):11
Gettman D, Lott JS, Goodwin G, Harrington T (2017) Impacts of laws and regulations on CV and AV technology introduction in transit operations. Federal Highway Administration
Guerra E (2016) Planning for cars that drive themselves: metropolitan planning organizations, regional transportation plans, and autonomous vehicles. J Plan Educ Res 36(2):210–224
Guston DH (2014) Understanding anticipatory governance. Soc Stud Sci 44(2):218–242
Hajer M (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci 36(2):175–195
Harper CD, Hendrickson CT, Mangones S, Samaras C (2016) Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 72:1–9
JafariNaimi N (2018) Our bodies in the trolley’s path, or why self-driving cars must *not* be programmed to kill. Sci Technol Hum Values 43(2)
Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3):223–244
Jasanoff S (2016) The ethics of invention: technology and the human future. WW Norton & Company
Jokinen JP, Sihvola T, Mladenovic MN (2017) Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region. Transp Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.004
König M, Neumayr L (2017) Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 44:42–52
Latour B, Venn C (2002) Morality and technology. Theory Cult Soc 19(5–6):247–260
Lutin J, Kornhauser A, Lerner-Lam E (2013) The revolutionary development of self-driving vehicles and implications for the transportation engineering profession. ITE J 83(7):28–33
Lyons G, Davidson C (2016) Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 88:104–116
Metzger J, Allmendinger P, Oosterlynck S (2015) Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European Territorial Governance. Routledge, London
Meyer J, Becker H, Bösch PM, Axhausen KW (2017) Autonomous vehicles: the next jump in accessibilities? Res Transp Econ 62:80–91
Milakis D et al (2017a) Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: scenarios for 2030 and 2050. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 17(1):63–85
Milakis D, van Arem B, van Wee B (2017b) Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. J Intell Transp Syst 21(4):324–348
Mladenovic M, Blyth PL, Abbas M, Kosonen I (2016) Intersecting our mobilities: path dependence from manually-operated semaphore to self-driving vehicles? In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on technology and society (ISTAS). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6
Mladenovic M et al (2017) Is planning (for) self-driving vehicle technology a question of social justice? A Finnish perspective. Association of European Schools of Planning. Lisbon
Nieuwenhuijsen J, de Almeida Correia GH, Milakis D et al (2018) Towards a quantitative method to analyze the long-term innovation diffusion of automated vehicles technology using system dynamics. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 86:300–327
Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39(6):751–760
Pacey A (1999) Meaning in technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Pangbourne K, Stead D, Mladenovic M, Milakis D (2018) The case of mobility as a service: a critical reflection on challenges for urban transport and mobility governance. In: Marsden G, Reardon L (eds) Governance of the smart mobility transition. Emerald, pp. 33–50
Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):496–511
Rayner S (2004) The novelty trap: why does institutional learning about new technologies seem so difficult? Ind High Edu 18(6):349–355
Rip A (1986) Controversies as informal technology assessment. Knowledge 8(2):349–371
Schellekens M (2015) Self-driving cars and the chilling effect of liability law. Comput Law Secur Rev 31(4):506–517
Schiller P (2016) Automated and connected vehicles: high tech hope or hype? World Transp Policy Pract 22(3):28–44
Shladover SE (2017) Connected and automated vehicle systems: introduction and overview. J Intell Transp Syst, 1–11
Stilgoe J (2017) Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Soc Stud Sci, 30631271774168
Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580
Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS (2016) Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 71:143–163
Thomopoulos N, Givoni M (2015) The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. Eur J Futur Res 3(1):14
Upham P, Kivimaa P, Virkamäki V (2013) Path dependence and technological expectations in transport policy: the case of Finland and the UK. J Transp Geogr 32:12–22
Urry J (2004) The system of automobility. Theory Cult Soc 21(4–5):25–39
Vellinga N (2017) From the testing to the deployment of self-driving cars: legal challenges to policymakers on the road ahead. Comput Law Secur Rev 33(6):847–863
Voss J-P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (2006) Reflexive Governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar
Walker W, Marchau V (2017) Dynamic adaptive policymaking for the sustainable city: the case of automated taxis. Int J Transp Sci Technol 6(1):1–12
Williams T, Wagner J, Morgan C et al (2017) Transportation planning implications of automated/connected vehicles on Texas highways (0-6848-1). Texas Department of Transportation
Winner L (1977) Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press, Cambridge
Zakharenko R (2016) Self-driving cars will change cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 61:26–37
Zmud J, Goodin G, Moran M et al (2017) Advancing automated and connected vehicles: policy and planning strategies for state and local transportation agencies. Federal Highway Administration
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported with funding from the Academy of Finland, through Strategic Research Council project BEMINE (No. 303538), and by the Climate-KIC, through SELF-DRIVEN Areas project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mladenović, M.N. (2019). How Should We Drive Self-driving Vehicles? Anticipation and Collective Imagination in Planning Mobility Futures. In: Finger, M., Audouin, M. (eds) The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96525-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96526-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)