Zusammenfassung
Any consideration of relationships between technology and ethics is likely at some point to encounter the concept of technocracy, as a proposal to incorporate scientific and engineering expertise into the political process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akin, W. E.: Technocracy and the American dream: The technocractic movement, 1900–1941. Berkeley and Los Angeles 1977.
Bell, D.: The China model: Political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton 2015.
Feenberg, A.: Questioning technology. New York 1999.
Fischer, F.: Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury 1990.
Gilley, B.: Technocracy and democracy as spheres of justice in public policy. Policy Science 50(1) (2017), 9–22.
Harris, C. E.: The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14(2) (2008), 153–164.
Janssen, M./Kuk, G.: The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly 33(3) (2016), 371–377.
Khanna, P.: Technocracy in America: Rise of the info-state. N. p. 2017a.
Khanna, P.: To beat populism, blend democracy and technocracy, S’pore style. The Straits Times. 2017b, January 21. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/to-beat-populismblend-democracy-and-technocracy-spore-style (6.11.2020).
Kim, S.: Confucianism, moral equality, and human rights: A Mencian perspective. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74(1) (2015), 149–185.
Liu, Y.: American technocracy and Chinese response: Theories and practices of Chinese expert politics in the period of the Nanjing Government, 1927–1949. Technology in Society 43 (2015), 75–85.
Liu, Y.: The benefits of technocracy in China. Issues in Science and Technology 33(1) (2016), 25–28.
Loeb, H.: Life in a technocracy: What it might be like. Syracuse 1996. Meynaud, J.: Technoracy. (P. Barnes, Trans.) New York 1968.
Mitcham, C. Justifying public participation in technical decisionmaking. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 16(1) (1997), 40–46.
Olson, R. G.: Scienism and technocracy in the twentieth century: The legacy of scientific management. Lanham2016.
Shrader-Frechette, K.: How some scientists and engineers contribute to environmental injustice. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society 47(1) (2017), 36–44.
Veblen, T.: The engineers and the price system. New York 1921.
Wang, R. R.: Globalizing the heart of the dragon: The impact of Technology on Confucian ethical values. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29(4) (2002), 553–569.
Widdows, H.: Global ethics: An introduction. London 2011.
Winner, L.: Autonomous technology. Cambridge, Mass. 1978.
Wong, P.-H.: The public and geoengineering decisionmaking: A view from Confucian political philosophy. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17(3) (2013), 350–367.
Zhu, Q.: Chinese technocracy. Issues in Science and Technology 33(2) (2017), 14–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, Y., Lan, L., Zhu, Q. (2021). Technocracy. In: Grunwald, A., Hillerbrand, R. (eds) Handbuch Technikethik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04901-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04901-8_22
Published:
Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04900-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04901-8
eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)