Abstract
Flow analysis is a ubiquitous and much-studied component of compiler technology—and its variations abound. Amongst the most well known is Shivers’ 0CFA; however, the best known algorithm for 0CFA requires time cubic in the size of the analyzed program and is unlikely to be improved. Consequently, several analyses have been designed to approximate 0CFA by trading precision for faster computation. Henglein’s simple closure analysis, for example, forfeits the notion of directionality in flows and enjoys an “almost linear” time algorithm. But in making trade-offs between precision and complexity, what has been given up and what has been gained? Where do these analyses differ and where do they coincide?
We identify a core language—the linear λ-calculus—where 0CFA, simple closure analysis, and many other known approximations or restrictions to 0CFA are rendered identical. Moreover, for this core language, analysis corresponds with (instrumented) evaluation. Because analysis faithfully captures evaluation, and because the linear λ-calculus is complete for ptime, we derive ptime-completeness results for all of these analyses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jones, N.D.: Flow analysis of lambda expressions (preliminary version). In: Proceedings of the 8th Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, London, UK, pp. 114–128. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)
Sestoft, P.: Replacing function parameters by global variables. Master’s thesis, DIKU, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Master’s thesis no. 254 (1988)
Shivers, O.: Control-Flow Analysis of Higher-Order Languages, or Taming Lambda. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Technical Report CMU-CS-91-145 (1991)
Midtgaard, J.: Control-flow analysis of functional programs. Technical Report BRICS RS-07-18, DAIMI, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark (2007)
Shivers, O.: Control flow analysis in Scheme. In: PLDI 1988: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1988 conference on Programming Language design and Implementation, pp. 164–174. ACM, New York (1988)
Heintze, N., McAllester, D.: On the cubic bottleneck in subtyping and flow analysis. In: LICS 1997: Proceedings of the 12th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Washington, DC, USA, p. 342. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1997)
Henglein, F.: Simple closure analysis. DIKU Semantics Report D-193 (1992)
Ashley, J.M., Dybvig, R.K.: A practical and flexible flow analysis for higher-order languages. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 20(4), 845–868 (1998)
Van Horn, D., Mairson, H.G.: Relating complexity and precision in control flow analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, pp. 85–96. ACM Press, New York (2007)
Heintze, N., McAllester, D.: Linear-time subtransitive control flow analysis. In: PLDI 1997: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1997 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pp. 261–272. ACM, New York (1997)
Girard, J.Y.: Linear logic: its syntax and semantics. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Advances in linear logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Sestoft, P.: Replacing function parameters by global variables. In: FPCA 1989: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Functional programming languages and computer architecture, pp. 39–53. ACM, New York (1989)
Mossin, C.: Flow Analysis of Typed Higher-Order Programs. PhD thesis, DIKU, University of Copenhagen (1997)
Nielson, F., Nielson, H.R., Hankin, C.: Principles of Program Analysis. Springer, New York (1999)
Ladner, R.E.: The circuit value problem is log space complete for P. SIGACT News 7(1), 18–20 (1975)
Mairson, H.G.: Linear lambda calculus and PTIME-completeness. Journal of Functional Programming 14(6), 623–633 (2004)
Jagannathan, S., Weeks, S.: A unified treatment of flow analysis in higher-order languages. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 393–407. ACM Press, New York (1995)
Mossin, C.: Higher-order value flow graphs. Nordic J. of Computing 5(3), 214–234 (1998)
Hankin, C., Nagarajan, R., Sampath, P.: Flow analysis: games and nets. In: The essence of computation: complexity, analysis, transformation, pp. 135–156. Springer, New York (2002)
Mossin, C.: Exact flow analysis. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (ed.) SAS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1302, pp. 250–264. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Statman, R.: The typed λ-calculus is not elementary recursive. Theor. Comput. Sci. 9, 73–81 (1979)
Henglein, F., Mairson, H.G.: The complexity of type inference for higher-order lambda calculi. In: POPL 1991: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 119–130. ACM, New York (1991)
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Van Horn, D., Mairson, H.G. (2008). Flow Analysis, Linearity, and PTIME. In: Alpuente, M., Vidal, G. (eds) Static Analysis. SAS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5079. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69166-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69166-2_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69163-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69166-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)