Skip to main content

Why do we need Ontology for Agent-Based Models?

  • Chapter
Complexity and Artificial Markets

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 614))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to stress some ontological and methodological issues for Agent-Based Model (ABM) building, exploration, and evaluation in the Social and Human Sciences. Two particular domain of interest are to compare ABM and simulations (Model To Model) within a given academic field or across different disciplines and to use ontology for to discuss about the epistemic and methodological consequences of modeling choices. The paper starts with some definitions of ontology in philosophy and computer sciences. The implicit and different ontology which underlies the approach of a same object of interest are discussed in the case of spatial economists and geographers. Finally, using the case of Shelling’s model, we discuss the concept of “ontological test,” and raise the question of the ontological compatibility between the “model world” and the “real world.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • F. Amblard, P. Bommel, and J. Rouchier. Assessment and validation of multi-agent models. In D. Phan and F. Amblard, editors, Multi-Agent Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences, chapter 4, pages 93-114. Bardwell Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Benenson and P. M. Torrens. Geosimulation; Automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. Wiley, New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Boman and E. Holm. Multi-agent systems, time geography, and microsimulation. In M-O. Olsson and G. Sj östedt, editors, Systems Approaches and their Applications, pages 95-118. Kluwer, Dordecht, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Daniel. Asynchronous Simulations of a Limit Order. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK, December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espace Géographique. Débat: Nouvelle économie g éographique et g éographie: quel dialogue? LEspace G éographique, 36(3):193-214, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ferber. Multi-agent concepts and methodologies. In D. Phan and F. Amblard, editors, MultiAgent Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences, chapter 1, pages 7-34. Bardwell Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ferber. Multi-agent Systems: an Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison Wesley Reading, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Fotheringham, C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. Sage, London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fujita and J. F. Thisse. Economic of agglomeration. Cities, Industrial Location and Regional Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Gilbert and R. Conte, editors. Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life. UCL Press, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Grimm. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what we have learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling, 115:129-148, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. R. Gruber. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In N. Guarino Poli, editor, International Workshop on Formal Ontology, Padova, Italy, 1993. Published in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(5-6), 1995, p 907-928.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hales, B. Edmonds, and Rouchier J. Model to model analysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(4), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Hausman. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Hutchins. Cognition in the Wild. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Hutchins and B. Hazlehurst. Auto-organization and emergence of shared language structure. In A. Cangelosi and D. Parisi, editors, Simulating the Evolution of Language, pages 279-305. Springer, London, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. R. Krugman. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 33(2): 483-499, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Livet. Towards an epistemology of multi-agent simulation in social science. In D. Phan and F. Amblard, editors, Multi-Agent Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences, chapter 8, pages 169-194. Bardwell Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Openshaw. Using a geographical analysis machine to detect the presence of spatial clusters and the location of clusters in synthetic data. In P. Boyle and F. E. Alexander, editors, Methods for Investigating Localised Clustering of Disease, volume 135, pages 68-87. IARC Scientific Publication, Lyon, France, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Openshaw. Developing gis-relevant zone-based spatial analysis methods. In M. Batty and P. Longley, editors, Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment, pages 55-73. Wiley, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Openshaw and J. Taylor. A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In Wrigley, editor, Statistical applications in the Spatial Sciences, pages 127-144. Pion, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Phan and F. Amblard, editors. Agent-based Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences. Bardwell Press, Oxford, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Sanders. Agent models in urban geography. In D. Phan and F. Amblard, editors, Multi-Agent Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences, chapter 7, pages 147-168. Bardwell Press, 2007a.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Sanders, editor. Models in Spatial Analysis. Geographical Information Systems series. ISTE, London, 2007b.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. S. Schelling. Micromotives and Macrobehaviour. Norton and Co, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Smith. Ontology. In L. Floridi, editor, Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pages 155-166. Blackwell, Oxford, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sperber. Individualisme m éthodologique et cognitivisme. In R. Boudon, F. Chazel, and A. Bouvier, editors, Cognition et sciences sociales, pages 123-136. Presse Universitaires de France, Paris, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden. Credible worlds: The status of theoretical models in economics. In U. M äki, editor, Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction, chapter 5, pages 107-136. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Tesfatsion and K. L. Judd. Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Phan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Livet, P., Phan, D., Sanders, L. (2008). Why do we need Ontology for Agent-Based Models?. In: Schredelseker, K., Hauser, F. (eds) Complexity and Artificial Markets. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 614. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70556-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics