Skip to main content

Abstract

The notion of a shared mental model is well known in the literature regarding team work among humans. It has been used to explain team functioning. The idea is that team performance improves if team members have a shared understanding of the task that is to be performed and of the involved team work. We maintain that the notion of shared mental model is not only highly relevant in the context of human teams, but also for teams of agents and for human-agent teams. However, before we can start investigating how to engineer agents on the basis of the notion of shared mental model, we first have to get a better understanding of the notion, which is the aim of this paper. We do this by investigating which concepts are relevant for shared mental models, and modeling how they are related by means of UML. Through this, we obtain a mental model ontology. Then, we formally define the notion of shared mental model and related notions. We illustrate our definitions by means of an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akkoyunlu, E., Ekanadham, K., Huber, R.: Some constraints and tradeoffs in the design of network communications. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP 1975), pp. 67–74. ACM, New York (1975)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The description logic handbook: Theory, implementation, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolstad, C., Endsley, M.: Shared mental models and shared displays: An empirical evaluation of team performance. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 43(3), 213–217 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradshaw, J., Feltovich, P., Jung, H., Kulkami, S., Allen, J., Bunch, L., Chambers, N., Galescu, L., Jeffers, R., Johnson, M., Sierhuis, M., Taysom, W., Uszok, A., Hoof, R.V.: Policy-based coordination in joint human-agent activity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2029–2036 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buckland, M., Gey, F.: The relationship between recall and precision. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(1), 12–19 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Converse, S.: Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan, N.J. (ed.) Individual and Group Decision Making, pp. 221–245. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, A., Chalmers, D.J.: The extended mind. Analysis 58, 10–23 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Teamwork. Nous, 487–512 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doyle, J., Ford, D.: Mental models concepts for system dynamics research. System Dynamics Review 14(1), 3–29 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Francois, C.: Systemics and cybernetics in a historical perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 16, 203–219 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentner, D., Stevens, A.: Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grosz, B., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group action. Journal of Artifical Intelligence 86(2), 269–357 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hindriks, K., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: A computational semantics for communicating rational agents based on mental models. In: Braubach, L., Briot, J.-P., Thangarajah, J. (eds.) ProMAS 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5919, pp. 31–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hindriks, K.V.: Programming rational agents in GOAL. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Tools and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennings, N.: Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions. Artificial Intelligence Journal 74(2) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, M., Jonker, C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M.: Joint activity testbed: Blocks world for teams (BW4T). In: Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Picard, G. (eds.) ESAW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5881, pp. 254–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jonker, C., Treur, J.: Compositional verification of multi-agent systems: a formal analysis of pro-activeness and reactiveness. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 11, 51–92 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein, G., Feltovich, P., Bradshaw, J., Woods, D.: Common ground and coordination in joint activity. In: Organizational Simulation, pp. 139–184 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klein, G., Woods, D.D., Bradshaw, J.M., Hoffman, R.R., Feltovich, P.J.: Ten challenges for making automation a “team player” in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(6), 91–95 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim, B., Klein, K.: Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27(4), 403 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathieu, E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.: The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology 85(2), 273–283 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rouse, W., Morris, N.: On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin 100(3), 349–363 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sycara, K., Sukthankar, G.: Literature review of teamwork models. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-06-50, Carnegie Mellon University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7, 83–124 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yen, J., Fan, X., Sun, S., Hanratty, T., Dumer, J.: Agents with shared mental models for enhancing team decision makings. Decision Support Systems 41(3), 634–653 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Vermeulen, B. (2011). Shared Mental Models. In: De Vos, M., Fornara, N., Pitt, J.V., Vouros, G. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems VI. COIN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21268-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21267-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21268-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics