Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual Attention in Dogs and the Evolution of Non-Verbal Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior

Abstract

The common history of Homo sapiens and Canis lupus familiaris dates back to between 11,000 and 32,000 years ago, when some wolves (Canis lupus) started living closely with humans. Although we cannot reach back into the past to measure the relative roles of wolves and humans in the ensuing domestication process, it was perhaps the first involving humans and another animal species. Yet its consequences for both species’ history are not completely understood. One of the puzzling aspects yet to be understood about the human–dog dyad is how dogs so readily engage in communication in the context of a social interactions with humans. To be sensitive to the meaning of human speech and gestures, dogs need to attend to various visual and vocal cues, in order to reconstruct the messages from patterns of human behavior that remain stable over time, while also generalizing to unfamiliar, novel contexts. This chapter will discuss this topic in light of some of the recent findings about dogs’ perceptual capacities for social cues. We describe some of the new technologies that are being used to better describe these perceptual processes, and present the results of a preliminary experiment using a portable eye-tracking system to gather data about dogs’ visual attention in a social interaction with humans, ending with a discussion of the possible cognitive mechanisms underlying dogs’ use of human social cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelsson, E., Ratnakumar, A., Arendt, M. L., Maqbool, K., Webster, M. T., Perloski, M., et al. (2013). The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature, 495(7441), 360–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I., Myatt, J. P., Wilson, A. M. (2013). Group hunting within the Carnivora: Physiological, cognitive and environmental influences on strategy and cooperation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. (1998). On the nature of transitions: The middle to upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic revolution. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 8(2), 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. A. (1996). Neocortex size and behavioural ecology in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 263(1367), 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. S. (1970). Primate status hierarchies. Primate Behavior, 1, 71–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertenthal, B., & Boyer, T. (2012). Developmental changes in Infants' visual attention to pointing. Journal of Vision, 12(9), 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugman, H., & Russel, A. (2004). Annotating multimedia/multi-modal resources with ELAN. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 2065–2068). Citeseer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food? Animal Cognition, 16(1), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccio, M. L., & Shepherd, S. V. (2013). 13 Pointing Hand: Joint Attention and Embodied Symbols. The Hand, an Organ of the Mind: What the Manual Tells the Mental, 303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: Domestication and early history. In: J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people (pp. 7–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1999). A natural history of domesticated mammals (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Natural History Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J., & Wilson, D. E. (2002). Mammals. Smithsonian handbooks (1st US ed.). London: DK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoni, G., & Palagi, E. (2008). Reconciliation in wolves (Canis lupus): New evidence for a comparative perspective. Ethology, 114(3), 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S. (2005). How dogs think: Understanding the canine mind. New York: Simon and Schuste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockford, S. J., & Iaccovoni, A. (2000). Dogs through time: An archaeological perspective. Proceedings of the 1st ICAZ Symposium on the History of the Domestic Dog. BAR international series, Vol. 889. Oxford, England: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, K. M., Nacewicz, B. M., Johnstone, T., Schaefer, H. S., Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., Alexander, A. L., et al. (2005). Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nature Neuroscience, 8(4), 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. M., & Valla, F. R. (1978). Evidence for domestication of dog 12,000 years ago in Natufian of Israel. Nature, 276(5688), 608–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2002). Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature, 418(6898), 700–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & O’Brien, S. J. (2009). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 19971–9978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgier, A. M., Jakovcevic, A., Mustaca, A. E., & Bentosela, M. (2009). Learning and owner-stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 81(1), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmingham, K. L., Rennie, C., Manor, B., & Bryant, R. A. (2011). Eye tracking and physiological reactivity to threatening stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(5), 668–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuzawa, M., Mills, D. S., & Cooper, J. J. (2005). More than just a word: Non-semantic command variables affect obedience in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 91(1), 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, J. C. (2005). Species comparative studies and cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(3), 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredebäck, G., Johnson, S., & Von Hofsten, C. (2009). Eye tracking in infancy research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298(5598), 1634–1636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 439–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori, Y., Kano, F., & Tomonaga, M. (2010). Differential sensitivity to conspecific and allospecific cues in chimpanzees and humans: Acomparative eye-tracking study. Biology Letters, 6(5), 610–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmer, H. (1990). Domestication: The decline of environmental appreciation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirata, S., Fuwa, K., Sugama, K., Kusunoki, K., & Fujita, S. (2010). Facial perception of conspecifics: Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) preferentially attend to proper orientation and open eyes. Animal Cognition, 13(5), 679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzman, P. S., Proctor, L. R., Levy, D. L., Yasillo, N. J., Meltzer, H. Y., & Hurt, S. W. (1974). Eye-tracking dysfunctions in schizophrenic patients and their relatives. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31(2), 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittyerah, M., & Gaunet, F. (2009). The response of guide dogs and pet dogs (Canis Familiaris) to cues of human referential communication (pointing and gaze). Animal Cognition, 12(2), 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for “fast mapping”. Science, 304(5677), 1682–1683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, J., Neumann, M., Brauer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Dogs, Canis familiaris, communicate with humans to request but not to inform. Animal Behaviour, 82(4), 651–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomonaga, M. (2011). The visual strategy specific to humans among hominids: A study using the gap-overlap paradigm. Vision research, 51(23–24), 2348–2355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, F., & Tomonaga, M. (2009). How chimpanzees look at pictures: A comparative eye-tracking study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological, 276(1664), 1949–1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, F., & Tomonaga, M. (2010). Attention to Emotional Scenes Including Whole-Body Expressions in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124(3), 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, F., & Tomonaga, M. (2013). Head-mounted eye tracking of a chimpanzee under naturalistic conditions. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaersgaard, A., Pertoldi, C., Loeschcke, V., & Hansen, D. W. (2008). Tracking the gaze of birds. Journal of Avian Biology, 39(4), 466–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koler-Matznick, J. (2002). The origin of the dog revisited. Anthrozoos, 15(2), 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, G., Soproni, K., Doka, A., & Miklósi, A. (2009). A comparative approach to dogs’ (Canis familiaris) and human infants’ comprehension of various forms of pointing gestures. Animal Cognition, 12(4), 621–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G., Karlsson, E. K., Perri, A., Webster, M. T., Ho, S. Y., Peters, J., et al. (2012). Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109(23), 8878–8883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupo, K. (2011). A dog is for hunting.Ethnozooarchaeology: The present and past of human–animal relationships, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, C. J., & Nelson, E. E. (2011). Eye-tracking with Nonhuman primates is now more accessible than ever before. American Journal of Primatology, 73(6), 562–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech, L. D. (1970). The wolf: The ecology and behavior of an endangered species. (1st ed.). Published for the American Museum of Natural History. Garden City, New York: Natural History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech, L. D. (2012). Wolf. New York: Random House Digital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merola, I., Prato-Previde, E., & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2012). Dogs’ social referencing towards owners and strangers. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e47653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi, A., Pongracz, P., Lakatos, G., Topal, J., & Csanyi, V. (2005). A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(2), 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. E., & Dunham, P. J. (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muro, C., Escobedo, R., Spector, L., & Coppinger, R. P. (2011). Wolf-pack (Canis lupus) hunting strategies emerge from simple rules in computational simulations. Behavioural Processes, 88(3), 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. J. (1985).Origins of the domestic dog: The fossil record. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, C., & Ruttan, L. (1988). The evolution of cooperative hunting. The American Naturalist, 132(2), 159–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palagi, E., & Cordoni, G. (2009). Postconflict third-party affiliation in Canis lupus: Do wolves share similarities with the great apes? Animal Behaviour, 78(4), 979–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86(2), 184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, D., & Ades, C. (2012). Two-item sentence comprehension by a dog (Canis familiaris). PLoS ONE, 7(2), e29689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, S. M., Laland, K. N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99(7), 4436–4441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruusila, V., Pesonen, M. (2004). Interspecific cooperation in human (Homo sapiens) hunting: The benefits of a barking dog (Canis familiaris). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 41(4), 545–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. (1995). The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, S. V. (2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4(5), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. I. (2007). The evolution of the social brain: Anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1624), 2429–2436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B., Yu, C., & Pereira, A. F. (2011). Not your mother’s view: The dynamics of toddler visual experience. Developmental Science, 14(1), 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somppi, S., Tornqvist, H., Hanninen, L., Krause, C., & Vainio, O. (2011). Dogs do look at images: Eye tracking in canine cognition research. Animal Cognition, 11(1), 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soproni, K., Miklósi, A., Topal, J., & Csanyi, V. (2001). Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(2), 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soproni, K., Miklósi, A., Topal, J., & Csanyi, V. (2002). Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116(1), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. P., Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2001). Tests of a dynamic systems account of the A-not-B error: The influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two-year-olds. Child development, 72(5), 1327–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. O. (1978). Variability in the wolf, a group hunter. In R. L. Hall & H. S. Sharp (Eds.) Wolf and man: Evolution in parallel ( pp. 31–40). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teglas, E., Gergely, A., Kupan, K., Miklósi, A., & Topal, J. (2012). Dogs’ gaze following is tuned to human communicative signals. Current Biology, 22(3), 209–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vila, C., Savolainen, P., Maldonado, J. E., Amorim, I. R., Rice, J. E., Honeycutt, R. L., et al. (1997). Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science, 276(5319), 1687–1689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisdorf, J. L. (2005). From foraging to farming: Explaining the Neolithic Revolution. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 561–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. J., Mills, D. S., & Guo, K. (2011). Development of a head-mounted, eye-tracking system for dogs. Journal of neuroscience methods, 194(2), 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus, A. L., Haigh, B., & Rigss, L. A. (1967).Eye movements and vision (vol 2. vol 5.10). New York: Plenum press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, S., & Manzanares, C. (2011). A Simple behavioral task combined with Noninvasive infrared eye-tracking for examining the potential impact of viruses and vaccines on memory and other cognitive functions in humans and Nonhuman primates. Journal of Medical Primatology, 40(4), 282–283.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research and the first author were supported by the Office of Vice Provost for Research of Indiana University. We wish to thank our participants and their owners for participating in this study. The authors would also like to thank to Mr. Jeff Sturgeon for technical advice, Dr. Bennett Bertenthal for helpful comments and discussion, Dr. Nicholas Port and the IU School of Optometry for their generous help and last but not least to the Indiana Statistical Consulting Center, particularly to Stephanie Dickinson for her guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Alejandra Rossi, Daniel Smedema & Colin Allen

  2. Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Alejandra Rossi & Francisco J. Parada

  3. Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Francisco J. Parada

Authors
  1. Alejandra Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Smedema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco J. Parada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Colin Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra Rossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Columbia University Barnard College, New York, New York, USA

    Alexandra Horowitz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossi, A., Smedema, D., Parada, F.J., Allen, C. (2014). Visual Attention in Dogs and the Evolution of Non-Verbal Communication. In: Horowitz, A. (eds) Domestic Dog Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53994-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation