Skip to main content

Soziale Selektivität in der Bildung - kein politisches Problem?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Social Model under Pressure
  • 1331 Accesses

Abstract

As in many other European countries, voter turnout in Switzerland has not increased despite increasing levels of education among the voting population, and differences in participation between the highest and the lowest educated have even grown (Armingeon and Schädel 2015). This contribution starts with the question: How do educational differences in Switzerland come about? An overview of the current state of research shows that family background – not school performance – explains a significant part of educational success. Yet, these effects of social selectivity contradict equal opportunity, leading to a sub-optimal selection of specialists and academically qualified within economy and society. In addition, it compromises social mobility. A principal question hence arises: Why does politics react much less to this challenge than to the promotion of skill potentials of other societal groups, for example those of women or youth in rural areas? Answers are sought on the basis of four hypotheses. Possible consequences for economy, society, community and democracy are discussed in the last section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armingeon, Klaus und Lisa Schädel. 2015. “Social Inequality in Political Participation: The Dark Sides of Individualisation.” West European Politics 38 (1): 1-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Peter und Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947-952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Rolf und Schoch, Jürg. 2018. Soziale Selektivität. Expertenbericht im Auftrag des Schweizerischen Wissenschaftsrats, Bern: SWIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, André. 2014. “Why is Turnout so Low in Switzerland? Comparing the Attitudes of Swiss and German Citizens towards Electoral Democracy.” Swiss Political Science Review 20 (4): 520-528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocher, Christoph. 2018. “Das Zuwanderungsproblem ist doch nicht gelöst.” Der Bund, 26 November 2018. https://www.derbund.ch/schweiz/standard/das-zuwanderungsproblem-ist-doch-nichtgeloest/story/14300744

  • Buchmann, Marlis, Irene Kriesi, Maarten Koomen, Christian Imdorf und Ariane Basler. 2016. “Differentiation in Secondary Education and Inequality in Educational Opportunities: The Case of Switzerland.” In Models of Secondary Education and Social Inequality, herausgegeben von H.-P. Blossfeld, S. Buchholz, J. Skopek und M. Triventi, 111–128. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, Rudolf. 2018. Stimmbeteiligung in Bolligen in den 35 Jahren der Selbständigkeit. Bolligen: Gemeinde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, Kaspar, Sascha Neumann und Katrin Brandenberg. 2017. Studien zur frü hkindlichen Bildung, Betreuung und Erziehung in der Schweiz. Zürich: Jacobs Foundation. https://jacobsfoundation.org/app/uploads/2017/07/JF_Whitepaper_FBBE_kurz_deu-1.pdf

  • Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1964. “Arbeiterkinder an unseren Universitäten.” Die Zeit, Ausgabe 26 vom 26. Juni, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermont Claude. 2016. “Taking Turns at the Ballot Box: Selective Participation as a New Perspective on Low Turnout.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (2): 213-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, Dominique. 2018. “Entrepreneurship and Innovation in the Disruption Age: The Three Dimensions of a Public Policy.” www.blog.wissenschafts-rat.ch. 8 Januar 2018. https://blog.wissenschaftsrat.ch/entrepreneurship-and-innovation-in-the-disruption-age/

  • Felouzis, Georges und Samuel Charmillot. 2017. “Les inégalités scolaires en Suisse.” Social Change in Switzerland 2017 (8): 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, Lukas. 2014. Keine Angst vor Emotionen- in der direkten Demokratie überwiegen Argumente. GfS Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griga, Dorit. 2014. “Participation in Higher Education of Youths with a Migrant Background in Switzerland.” Swiss Journal of Sociology 40 (3): 379-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjar, Andreas und Rolf Becker (Hrsg). 2009. Expected and Unexpected Consequences of the Educational Expansion in Europe and the US: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings in Comparative Perspective, 377–416. Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, Daniel. 2017. Die schulische Selektion als soziale Praxis. Aushandlungen von Bildungsentscheidungen beim Übergang von der Primarschule in die Sekundarstufe I. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, Daniela. 2016. “Politische Partizipation und politische Bildung in der Schweiz. Eine empirische Untersuchung des Partizipationsverhaltens junger Erwachsener in der Schweiz.” PhD diss., Universität Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labhardt. 1964. Bericht Labhardt zur Bundeshilfe für die kantonalen Universitäten. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 1974. Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Georg. 2006. Participation, Information and Democracy: The Consequences of Low Levels of Participation and Information for the Functioning of Democracy. Hamburg: Lit-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Georg. 2007. “The Consequences of Low Turnout in Direct Democracy.” Electoral Studies 26 (3): 612-623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longchamp, Claude, Martina Mousson, Stephan Tschöpe, Johanna Lea Schwab, Sabrina Schüpbach, und Alexander Frind (2016). VOX Trend Legislaturbericht 2011-2015. Bern: GfS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, Philip. 2018. Die politische Ökonomie des Populismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciarini, Pascal, Fabio Cappelletti, Andreas C. Goldberg und Simon Lanz. 2015. “The Underexplored Species: Selective Participation in Direct Democratic Votes.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1): 75-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKBF. 2018. Bildungsbericht Schweiz 2018. Aarau: Schweizerische Koordinationsstelle Für Bildungsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • SWR. 2018. Schweizerischer Wissenschaftsrat. Soziale Selektivität. Empfehlungen des Schweizerischen Wissenschaftrats. Bern: SWIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle und Clau Dermont. 2015. “How Exclusive is Assembly Democracy? Citizens’ Assembly and Ballot Participation Compared.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1): 95-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm Margrit und Martin Viehhäuser. 2009. “Frü hkindliche Bildung und soziale Ungleichheit. Analysen und Perspektiven zum chancenausgleichenden Charakter frü hkindlicher Bildungsangebote.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation 29 (4): 403-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahm, Rudolf. 2014. Die Akademisierungsfalle. Bern: hep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 2004. Die Logik des kollektiven Handelns: Kollektivgüter und die Theorie der Gruppen. 5. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triventi, Moris, Nevena Kulic, Jan Skopek und Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2016. “Secondary School Systems and Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Contemporary Societies.” In Models of Secondary Education and Social Inequality herausgegeben von Hans-Peter Blossfeld, Sandra Buchholz, Jan Skopek und Moris Triventi, 3–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, Stefan, C. und Bernhard Weber. 2003. “Welche Löhne und Bildungsrenditen erwarten Studierende an Schweizer Hochschulen?” In Hochschulökonomie – Analysen interner Steuerungsprobleme und gesamtwirtschaftliche Effekte Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Band 296, herausgegeben von Uschi Backes-Gellner und Corinna Schmidtke, 145 – 161. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangger, Christoph und Becker Rolf. 2016. “Die Bildungsexpansion in der Schweiz – eine Realanalyse unter Berücksichtigung geschlechtsspezifischer Bildungschancen.” Swiss Journal of Sociology 42 (3): 429-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf Linder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Linder, W. (2020). Soziale Selektivität in der Bildung - kein politisches Problem?. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics