Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The political economy of the German current account surplus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Social Model under Pressure

  • 1290 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses a long-standing feature of Germany's political economy, namely its persistent current account surplus. While it has been criticized by many of the country's trading partners as a cause of economic difficulties (most recently in Southern Europe during the Eurozone crisis), within Germany is mostly perceived as a success story and proof of the country's economic competence and competitiveness. The article discusses the historic development of the current account (which also saw lasting deficits after unification), before turning to theoretical attempts to explain the development of the 'trading state'. The chapter then discusses the domestic and international debates around the surplus, emphasizing the political nature of that debate, before moving on to discuss whether (and if so how) the German government can influence the current account development in the future. The conclusion argues that the current account surplus can be regarded as the exercise of a relative institutional advantage – namely Germany's coordinated wage bargaining system, which is highly successful in stabilizing unit labour costs. Being rooted in a consensus between employers and trade unions to exchange non-maximisation of wage proceeds for a guarantee of safe employment, a high degree of persistence can be expected even in the case of politically negative consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelshauser, Werner. 2011. Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Von 1945 bis zur Gegenwart, 2., vollständig überarbeitete, aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Michel. 1993. Capitalism Against Capitalism. London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Christopher S. 1989. “The Underdevelopment of Keynesianism in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism across Nations, edited by Peter A. Hall., 263–289. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Lucio Baccaro. 2015. “The Crisis and Germany. The Trading State Unleashed.” In Complex Democracy, edited by Volker Schneider and Burkard Eberlein, 165–183. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro, Lucio, and Chiara Benassi. 2017. “Throwing out the Ballast. Growth Models and the Liberalization of German Industrial Relations.” Socio-Economic Review 15 (1): 85–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, Ben. 2015. “Germany’s Trade Surplus is a Problem.” Accessed January 23, 2019. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/ben-bernanke/2015/04/03/germanys-trade-surplus-is-a-problem/.

  • Brunnermeier, Markus K., Harold James, and Jean-Pierre Landau. 2016. The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. 2017a. “Das Nationale Reformprogramm 2017.“ In: Schlaglichter der Wirtschaftspolitik, 28–30. Accessed January 23, 2019. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Schlaglichter-der-Wirtschaftspolitik/schlaglichter-derwirtschaftspolitik-05-2017.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=26.

  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. 2017b. “Der deutsche Leistungsbilanzüberschuss im Lichte der deutsch-amerikanischen Handelsbeziehungen.“ In Schlaglichter der Wirtschaftspolitik, 10–15. Accessed January 23, 2019. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Schlaglichter-der-Wirtschaftspolitik/schlaglichter-der-wirtschaftspolitik-05-2017.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=26.

  • Busch, Andreas. 200. “Globalisation and national varieties of capitalism: The contested viability of the ‘German model’.” German Politics 14 (2): 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, Andreas. 2014. “Germany and the Euro.” In: Developments in German politics 4, edited by Stephen Padgett, William Paterson, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 188–210. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, Andreas, and Roman Goldbach. 2011. “Die Stellung Deutschlands in der Weltwirtschaft.“ In Deutsche Außenpolitik. Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen, edited by Thomas Jäger, Alexander Höse, and Kai Oppermann, 275–295. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundesbank. 2013. Geschäftsbericht 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (ed.). 1988. 40 Jahre Deutsche Mark. Monetäre Statistiken 1948 – 1987. Frankfurt am Main: Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • DGB Bundesvorstand. 2015. “Investieren gegen Ungleichgewichte.” klartext 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Kenneth. 2005. “Economic Policy Management. Catastrophic Equilibrium, Tipping Points and Crisis Interventions.” In Governance in Contemporary Germany. The Semisovereign State Revisited, edited by Simon Green and William E. Paterson, 115–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Kenneth, and Kevin Featherstone. 1999. The Road to Maastricht. Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2014. Macroeconomic Imbalances. Germany 2014. Brussels: European Commission, Accessed January 23, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2765/7919.

  • European Commission. 2017. Country Report Germany 2017. Including an In-depth Review on the Prevention and Correction of Macroeconomic Imbalances. Accessed January 23, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2017-european-semester-country-report-germany-en.pdf.

  • Frieden, Jeffry, and Stefanie Walter. 2017. “Understanding the Political Economy of the Eurozone Crisis.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haffert, Lukas. 2016. Die schwarze Null. Über die Schattenseiten ausgeglichener Haushalte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, Wolfgang. 1980. “Germany as an Extraordinary Trader.” In A European and global power. [Based on papers presented at a conference held at the Bologna Center of Johns Hopkins University, Oct. 5-7, 1978], edited by Wilfrid L. Kohl and Giorgio Basevi, 3–43. West Germany, Lexington Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, edited by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, Martin F. 2017. “Leistungsbilanzüberschüsse: Bitte nicht großdeutsch.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, May 20, 2017. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/sorge-umumwandlung-der-eurozone-15014236.html.

  • Holtfrerich, Carl-Ludwig. 1998. “Geldpolitik bei festen Wechselkursen (1948 - 1970).” In Fünfzig Jahre Deutsche Mark. Notenbank und Währung in Deutschland seit 1948, edited by Deutsche Bundesbank, 347–438. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, Martin. 2004. “Der organisierte Kapitalismus in Deutschland und sein Niedergang. Unternehmenskontrolle und Arbeitsbeziehungen im Wandel.” In Politik und Markt, edited by Roland Czada and Reinhard Zintl, 300–321. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2010. World Economic Outlook April 2010. Rebalancing Growth. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2017. Germany. 2017 Article IV Consultation - Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Germany. Accessed January 23, 2019. http://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/CR/2017/cr17192.ashx.

  • International Monetary Fund. 2018. World Economic Outlook April 2018. Cyclical Upswing, Structural Change. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2010. “Real Exchange Rates and Competitiveness: The Political Economy of Skill Formation, Wage Compression, and Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 601–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Wade. 2017. Surplus Germany. Accessed January 23, 2019. http://www.transatlanticacademy.org/sites/default/files/publications/Jacoby%20-%20SurplusGermany.pdf.

  • Johnston, Alison, Bob Hancké, and Suman Pant. 2014. “Comparative Institutional Advantage in the European Sovereign Debt Crisis.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (13): 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Claire. 2017, March 7. “Germany’s Trade Surplus Sparks Concern at Home and Abroad.” Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/a143878a-fea9-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30.

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, Robert, Marco Ratto, Werner Roeger, Jan in ’t Veld, and Lukas Vogel. 2015. “What Drives the German Current Account? And How Does it Affect other EU Member States?” Economic Policy 30 (81): 47–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreile, Michael. 1977. “West Germany. The Dynamics of Expansion.” International Organization 31 (4): 775–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loschky, Alexander, and Liane Ritter. 2007. “Konjunkturmotor Export.“ Wirtschaft und Statistik: 478–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Dalia, ed. 2018. Explaining Germany’s exceptional recovery. London: CEPR Press. A VoxEU.org eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, David. 1993. The Bundesbank. The bank that rules Europe. London: Mandarin paperback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, Hans W. 1990. “Germany and Japan. The New Civilian Powers.” Foreign Affairs 69 (5): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maull, Hans W. 2007. “Deutschland als Zivilmacht.” In Handbuch zur deutschen Außenpolitik, edited by Siegmar Schmidt, Gunther Hellmann and Reinhard Wolf, 73–84. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2010. OECD Economic Surveys. Euro area 2010. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2016. OECD Economic Surveys. Germany 2016. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2017. Main economic indicators. January 2017. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2018. OECD Economic Surveys. Germany 2018. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piel, Dieter. 1975. “Die außenpolitische Rolle der Wirtschaftsverbände.” In Handbuch der deutschen Außenpolitik, edited by Hans-Peter Schwarz, 207–215. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D., and Nicholas Bayne. 1987. Hanging Together. Cooperation and Conflict in the Seven-Power Summits. Revised and enlarged ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Gerhard A. 2006. Der Preis der deutschen Einheit. Die Wiedervereinigung und die Krise des Sozialstaats. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, Richard N. 1987. Der neue Handelsstaat. Herausforderungen für Politik und Wirtschaft. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. 2014. Mehr Vertrauen in Marktprozesse. Jahresgutachten 2014/15. Wiesbaden: Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung; Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 1987. Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Das „Modell Deutschland“ im Vergleich. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Helmut. 2011. “Rede Helmut Schmidt auf dem SPD-Bundesparteitag am 4. Dezember 2011 in Berlin.”, Accessed January 23, 2019. http://www.spd.de/aktuelles/Pressemitteilungen/21498/20111204_rede_helmut_schmidt.html.

  • Schönhoven, Klaus. 2014. “Geschichte der deutschen Gewerkschaften. Phasen und Probleme.” In Handbuch Gewerkschaften in Deutschland, edited by Wolfgang Schroeder, 59–83. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonfield, Andrew. 1965. Modern Capitalism. The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. 2017. Statistisches Jahrbuch Deutschland und Internationales. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 1991. “On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production.” In Beyond Keynesianism. The Socio-economics of Production and Full Employment, edited by Egon Matzner and Wolfgang Streeck, 21–61. Aldershot: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 1997. “German Capitalism. Does it exist? Can it survive?” New Political Economy 2 (2): 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Anke Hassel. 2003. “The Crumbling Pillars of Social Partnership.” West European Politics 26 (4): 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of International Affairs. 2013. Report to Congress on International Economic and Exchange Rate Policies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Brooke. 2010. “Older and Wiser. A Special Report on Germany.” The Economist, March 13, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Andreas Busch

Authors
  1. Andreas Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Busch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Romana Careja

  2. Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Patrick Emmenegger

  3. Department of Political Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Nathalie Giger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Busch, A. (2020). The political economy of the German current account surplus. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation