Abstract
This chapter discusses the mutual influence of emerging technologies and emergent pedagogies. The potential of one specific technology or application has to be analysed in a particular scenario. We maintain that the dialogue between technology and pedagogy is absolutely necessary because there is a constant influence between them. The difference is that as technology becomes more invisible, pedagogy needs to make its practices visible offering practices that take into account the fundamental needs of modern society. This chapter is divided into three sections. Firstly, we will describe the main educational challenges of the networked knowledge society. Secondly, we will centre on the main directions and theories that support emergent pedagogies. Finally, we will conclude this chapter with an analysis of the implications and relationship between emerging pedagogies and emergent technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The first NMC Horizon Report was published in 2004.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
In the last case, the original is āteachers and policiesā. We have extended the cluster to educators and researchers.
References
Abiko, T. (2011). A response from Japan to TLRPās ten principles for effective pedagogy. Research Papers in Education, 26(3), 357ā365.
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159ā181.
Ala-Mutka, K., Redecker, C., Punie, Y., Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Centeno, C. (2010). The Future of Learning: European Teachersā Visions. Report on a foresight consultation at the 2010 eTwinning Conference. Seville.
Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7ā33.
Anderson, T. (2010a). Theories for learning with emerging technologies. In G. Velesianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 23ā40). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press/Athabasca University.
Anderson, T. (2010b). Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 23ā39). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments-the future of eLearning? Elearning papers, 2(1), 1ā8.
Beaty, L., Cousin, G., & Hodgson, V. (2010). Revisiting the e-quality in networked learning manifesto. InĀ Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked LearningĀ (pp. 585ā592).
Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ādigital nativesā debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of studentsā technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26(5), 321ā331.
Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59ā71.
Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71ā82.
Carvalho, L. & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks.Routledge.
Chatti, M. A. (2013). The LaaN Theory.Ā Personal learning environments, networks, and knowledge. www.elearn.rwth-aachen.de/dl1151|Mohamed_Chatti_LaaN_preprint.Pdf.
Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International journal of knowledge and learning, 3(4ā5), 404ā420.
Chatti, M. A., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010a). Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66ā85.
Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Quix, C. (2010b). Connectivism: The network metaphor of learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5(1), 80ā99.
Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5), 2.
Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Collective intelligence and elearning, 20, 1ā26.
Downes, S. (2010). New technology supporting informal learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 27ā33.
Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. London: Routledge.
Facer, K., & Sandford, R. (2010). The next 25Ā years? Future scenarios and future directions for education and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 74ā93.
Fullan, B. M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Seattle, Washington: Collaborative Impact.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Boston: Pearson.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2ā3), 87ā105.
Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: KlĆ¼wer Academic Publishers.
Gurung, B (2013). Emerging pedagogies in changing contexts: Pedagogies in networked knowledge society, New Mexico State University, 1(2), 105ā124.
Hase, S. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: Some challenges and opportunities. Impact: Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-learning, 1(1), 43ā52.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007a). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Education, 4(1), 111ā119.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007b). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111ā118.
Hase, S. & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. UltiBase. Retrieved December 28, 2005, http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm
James, M., & Pollard, A. (2008). Primary Review Research Survey: 2/4 Learning and teaching in primary schools: insights from TLRP. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
James, M., & Pollard, A. (2011). TLRPās ten principles for effective pedagogy: Rationale, development, evidence, argument and impact. Research Papers in Education, 26(3), 275ā328.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). The NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Latour, B. (1997). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications (working paper). Retrieved from http://www.cours.fse.ulaval.ca/edc-65804/latour-clarifications.pdf
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mayes, T., Morrison, D., Mellar, H., Bullen, P. & Oliver, M. (2009). Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/learningandtech/Transforming.pdf
Mas, X. (2014). La integraciĆ³ dels usos de la tecnologia digital de les persones adultes. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. Dissertation.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017ā1054.
Ngāambi, D. (2013). Effective and ineffective uses of emerging technologies: Towards a transformative pedagogical model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 652ā661.
Redecker, A. C., Leis, M., & Leendertse, M. (2011). The future of learning: Preparing for change. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., & Gaved, M. (2013). Innovating pedagogy 2013: Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., et al. (2012). Innovating pedagogy 2012: Open University innovation report 1. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1ā22.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3ā10.
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Available at http://www.elearnspace.org/Knowin-gKnowledge_LowRes.pdf
Sinay, E., & Yashkina, A. (2012). Technology and innovation in education: Towards a single vision and plan for the Toronto District School Board. Toronto.
Stoyanov, S., Bert, H., & Paul, K. (2010). Mapping major changes to education and training in 2025. JRC Technical Note.
Tan, S. C., Divaharan, S., Tan, L., & Cheah, H. M. (2011). Self-directed learning with ICT: Theory, practice and assessment. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Taylor, R. P. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College.
Veletsianos, G. (2010). Emerging technologies in distance education. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gros, B. (2016). The Dialogue Between Emerging Pedagogies and Emerging Technologies. In: Gros, B., Kinshuk, ., Maina, M. (eds) The Future of Ubiquitous Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47723-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47724-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)