Abstract
The aim of this contribution is to provide a contrastive analysis of the conceptualisation of EUROPE in EU-parliamentary speeches of members of two right-wing populist parties, the Austrian FPÖ (Freiheitliche Partei Ӧsterreichs) and the Italian Lega. The analysis covers the time span from January 2017 to March 2019, during which both parties belonged to the Europe of Nations and Freedom group. Based on the theoretical framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff/Johnson 1980), the main aim of this study is to identify lexical choices, frames and conceptual metaphors referring to the European Union, in which the fairy tale (Lakoff 2004; Karpman 2014) represents the reference model and the leading narrative. Using FrameNet, the German dictionary Duden and the Italian dictionary Grande dizionario della lingua italiana as a starting point, metaphors were identified through the Metaphor Identification Procedure of the Pragglejaz Group (2007) and the analysis was carried out with the software program AntConc. The original frame ORGANIZATION, which conceptualises the European Union, is associated with two other frames analysed here, PEOPLE_BY_MORALITY and CRIME_SCENARIO, on the basis of FrameNet, which activate the mental model of the fairy tale, in which the EU is the VILLAIN, the criminal, the culprit, someone to point the finger at, someone who makes the VICTIM suffer, someone against whom a HERO has to react.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Akkerman, Tjitske (2012): “Comparing radical right parties in government: immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996-2010).” In: West European Politics 35 (3), 511-529.
Akkerman, Tjitske (2015): “Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: a fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades.” In: Party Politics 21 (1), 54-67.
Bergstrand, Kelly/Jasper, James M. (2018): “Villains, victims, and heroes in character theory and affect control theory.” In: Social Psychology Quarterly 81 (3), 228-247.
Charaudeau, Patrick (2019): “De l’état victimaire au discours de victimisation: Cartographie d’un territoire discursif.” In: Grinshpun, Yana (ed.), Le dispositif victimaire et sa disqualification, 1-18.. (= Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 23). Online: <https://journals.openedition.org/aad/3386> [Rev. 01-08-2020].
Chilton, Paul (1996): Security Metaphors, Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
Chilton, Paul/Ilyin, Mikhail (1993): “Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the ‘common European house’.” In: Discourse and Society 4 (1), 7-31.
Colaci, Laura A. (2018): Politologia del linguaggio italiano e tedesco. Metafore concettuali e strategie retorico-narrative al Parlamento Europeo. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Colaci, Laura A. (2020): “L’uso delle metafore concettuali come propaganda contro l’immigrazione. Analisi delle Pagine Facebook di Matteo Salvini e Jӧrg Meuthen.” In: Lingue e Linguaggi 35, 101-128.
Danileţ, Magdalena/Mihai, Olesia/Clipa, Anca (2017): “EU’s metaphorical representation in the Moldovan economic press.” In: CES Working Papers 9 (2), 97-111.
Drulák, Petr (2004): “Metaphors Europe lives by: language and institutional change of the European Union.” In: EUI Working Paper SPS 2004/15, Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute, 1-53. Online: <https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/2632/sps2004-15.pdf; jsessionid=2B416DD7E4FC6BFF1119CC2F-61615B0F?sequence=1> [Rev. 01-08-2020].
Drulák, Petr (2006): “Motion, container and equilibrium: metaphors in the discourse about European integration.” In: European Journal of International Relations 12 (4), 499-531.
Drulák, Petr/Königová, Lucie (2007): “Figuring out Europe: EU metaphors in the minds of Czech civil servants.” In: Perspectives 28 (1), 5-23.
Duden = Dudenredaktion (2019): Deutsches Universalwӧrterbuch. Berlin: Dudenverlag.
El Refaie, Elisabeth (2001): “Metaphors we discriminate by: naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers.” In: Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3), 352-371.
Fillmore, Charles (1982): “Frame semantics.” In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, 111-138.
FrameNet Project, founded and directed by C. Fillmore, Berkeley. Online: <https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/> [Rev. 04-10-2020].
Frey, Barbara (2016): “Drama-/Gewinner-Dreieck: Will ich Retter sein – oder Coach?” In: Schulz, Michael/Schoppmann, Susanne/Hegedüs, Anna/Gurtner, Caroline/Stefan, Harald/Finklenburg, Udo/Needham, Ian/Hahn, Sabine (eds.), „Fremdsein überwinden“. Kompetenzen der psychiatrischen Pflege in Praxis – Management – Ausbildung – Forschung. Vortrӓge, Workshops und Posterprӓsentationen. 13. Dreilӓnderkongress Pflege in der Psychiatrie in Bielefeld. Bern: Verlag Berner Fachhochschule, 356-359.
Giglioli, Daniele (2014): Critica della vittima. Un esperimento con l’etica. Roma: Nottetempo.
GDLI = Grande dizionario della lingua italiana, fondato da S. Battaglia, Torino: UTET. Online: <http://www.gdli.it/> [Rev. 01-08-2020].
Hülsse, Rainer (2003): “Sprache ist mehr als Argumentation. Zur wirklichkeitskonstituierenden Rolle von Metaphern.” In: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 10 (2), 211-246.
Islentyeva, Anna (2019): “The Europe of scary metaphors: the voices of the British right-wing press.” In: Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67 (3), 209-229.
Ivaldi, Antonella (2004): “Il triangolo drammatico: da strumento descrittivo a strumento terapeutico.” In: Cognitivismo clinico 1 (2), 108-123.
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. (1989): “Mental models.” In: Posner, Michael (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 469-499.
Karpman, Stephen B. (1968): “Fairy tales and script drama analysis.” In: Transactional Analysis Bulletin 7 (26), 39-43.
Karpman, Stephen B. (2014): A Game Free Life. The Definitive Book on the Drama Triangle and Compassion Triangle. San Francisco: Drama Triangle Publications.
Lakoff, George (1991a): “Metaphor and war: the metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf.” In: Peace Research 23 (2/3), 25-32.
Lakoff, George (1991b): “Una figura del pensiero.” In: Cacciari, Cristina (ed.), Teorie della metafora. L’acquisizione, la comprensione e l’uso del linguaggio figurato. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 215-228.
Lakoff, George (2004): Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. The Essential Guide for Progressives. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing. Lakoff, George (2006): Non pensare all’elefante! Fusi Orari.
Lakoff, George/Johnson, Mark (1980): Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Maneri, Marcello (2009): “I media e la guerra alle migrazioni.” In: Palidda, Salvatore (ed.), Razzismo democratico. La persecuzione degli stranieri in Europa. Milano: Agenzia X, 66-86.
Maneri, Marcello (2012): “L’immigrazione nei media. La traduzione di pratiche di controllo nel linguaggio in cui viviamo.” In: Anuac 1 (1), 24-37.
Maneri, Marcello (2013): “Si fa presto a dire ‘sicurezza’. Analisi di un oggetto culturale.” In: Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa 6 (2), 283-312.
Messu, Michel (2018): L’ère de la victimisation. La Tour d’Aigues: Éditions de l’Aube.
Milizia, Denise/Spinzi, Cinzia (2020): “When a relationship ends ‘there can be no turning back’. The divorce metaphor in the Brexit discourse.” In: Lingue e Linguaggi 34, 137-165.
Minsky, Marvin (1975): “A framework for representing knowledge.” In: Winston, Patrick Henry (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 211-277.
Mudde, Cas (2007): Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Musolff, Andreas (2001): “The metaphorisation of European politics: movement on the road to Europe.” In: Musolff, Andreas/Good, Colin/Wittlinger, Ruth/Points, Petra (eds.), Attitudes Towards Europe: Language in the Unification Process. Aldershot: Ashgate, 179-200.
Musolff, Andreas (2004): “The heart of the European body politic: British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ.” In: Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 25 (5-6), 437-452.
Musolff, Andreas (2008): “The embodiment of Europe: how do metaphors evolve?.” In: Frank, Roslyn M./Dirven, René/Ziemke, Tom/Bernárdez, Enrique (eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 301-326.
Musolff, Andreas (2009): “Love, parenthood and gender in the European family: the British perspective.” In: Ißler, Roland Alexander/Renger, Almut-Barbara (eds.), Europa – Stier und Sternenkranz. Von der Union mit Zeus zum Staatenverbund. Gӧttingen: V&R Unipress/Bonn University Press, 537-548.
Musolff, Andreas (2010): “The eternal outsider? Scenarios of Turkey’s ambitions to join the European Union in the German press.” In: Šarić, Ljiljana/Musolff, Andreas/Manz, Stefan/Hudabiunigg, Ingrid (eds.), Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim. Cultural Identities in Public Discourse. Bristol et al.: Multilingual Matters, 157-172.
Musolff, Andreas (2017): “Truths, lies and figurative scenarios: metaphors at the heart of Brexit.” In: Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5), 641-657.
O’Brien, Gerald V. (2003): “Indigestible food, conquering hordes, and waste materials: metaphors of immigrants and the early immigration restriction debate in the United States.” In: Metaphor & Symbol 18 (1), 33-47.
Pirazzini, Daniela (2016): “La rappresentazione in linguaggio della giustizia come fiaba. Modelli argomentativi della discriminazione nella cultura digitale francese e italiana.” In: Lingue e Linguaggi 17, 155-180.
Pragglejaz Group (2007): “MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse.” In: Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1), 1-39.
Rocco, Goranka/Schafroth, Elmar (2019): “Diskurse im interlingualen Vergleich: Forschungs-perspektiven und methodische Herausforderungen.” In: Rocco, Goranka/Schafroth, Elmar (eds.), Vergleichende Diskurslinguistik. Methoden und Forschungspraxis. Berlin et al.: Peter Lang, 7-33.
Santa Ana, Otto (1999): “ ‘Like an animal I was treated’: anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse.” In: Discourse & Society 10 (2), 191-224.
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika (2007): Sprache und Emotion. Tübingen: Francke.
Sommella, Silvia (2019): “The fairy tale speeches by right-wing populist parties in the European Parliament. A linguistic analysis in the German and Italian languages.” In: AION Annali Sezione Germanica. Nuova serie XXIX, 101-130.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2006): “Discourse, context and cognition.” In: Discourse Studies 8 (1), 159-177.
Van Spanje, Joost (2010): “Contagious parties. Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe.” In: Party Politics 16 (5), 563-586.
Zhabotynska, Svitlana (2018): “Images of Ukraine-EU relations in conceptual metaphors of Ukrainian mass media.” In: Cognition, Communication, Discourse 17, 118-140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sommella, S. (2022). The Fairy Tale Mental Model in Speeches by the Austrian FPÖ and the Italian Lega Right-Wing Populist Parties in the European Parliament: A Contrastive Linguistic Analysis. In: Heinemann, S., Helfrich, U., Visser, J. (eds) On the Discursive Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Europe. Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics(). J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64893-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64893-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64892-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64893-3
eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)