Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Groundwater Boundary Matters into Catchment Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dilemma of Boundaries

Part of the book series: Global Environmental Studies ((GENVST))

Abstract

With 97% of the world’s freshwater resources stored underground, the connection between groundwater resources to the metrics of space, scale and time common to the geographic study of natural resources has not been extensively investigated by political geographers. Recognized as a common pool resource, the management and governance of groundwater resources is challenging and increasingly conflictive not only due to its hidden nature, but also because of the difficulty in placing boundaries around the groundwater resources and user domains.

Given that groundwater is the world’s most extracted raw material with withdrawal rates estimated to range between 800 and 1,000 km3 per year through millions of water wells, the groundwater domain boundaries are three-dimensional and change with time. A previously unrecognized typology for groundwater resources and user domains determined that (1) traditional approaches to defining groundwater domains focus on predevelopment conditions, referred to herein as a “commons” boundary, (2) groundwater development creates human-caused or a “hydrocommons” boundary where hydrology and hydraulics are meshed, and (3) the social and cultural values of groundwater users define a “commons heritage” boundary acknowledging that groundwater resources are part of the “common heritage of humankind”. This typology helps define a fundamental unit of analysis to aggregate demographic, social, and economic data. Emerging paradigms of groundwater governance suggest “unitizing” some groundwater development situations as one means to mitigate the inefficiency of a possession or use-based system of groundwater along with the inefficiencies associated with joint access to groundwater. Yet drawing these domain boundaries is supremely political and morphs with changing social and cultural values. Incompatibilities often arise over the use and equitable, or inequitable, distribution of groundwater, “values” attached to groundwater, conceptual models, uncertainty, as well as on missing information, inaccurate data, and how the “science” will be used by knowledge entrepreneurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams WM, Brockington D, Dyson J, Vira B (2003) Managing tragedies: understanding conflict over common pool resources. Science 302:1915–1916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EW (1999) Geopolitics: international boundaries as fighting places. In: Gray CS, Sloan G (eds) Geopolitics, geography, and strategy. Frank Cass, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker MHN (2009) Transboundary river floods: examining countries, international river basins and continents. Water Pol 11:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisson RA, Lehr JH (2004) Modern groundwater exploration: discovering new water resources in consolidated rocks using innovative hydrogeologic concepts, exploration,aquifer testing, and management methods. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist WA, Ingram HM (2003) Boundaries seen and unseen: resolving transboundary groundwater problems. Water Int 28:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist WA, Schlager E (2005) Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Soc Nat Resour 18:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredeheoft JD (1997) Safe yield and the water budget myth. Ground Water 35:929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredehoeft J, Durbin T (2009) Ground water development—the time to full capture problem. Ground Water 47:506–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buck SJ (1998) The global commons: an introduction. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati R, Smith B, Varzi AC (1998) Ontological tools for geographic representation. In: Guarino N (ed) Formal ontology in information systems. Ios Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca K (2006) Governing water: contentious transnational politics and global institution building. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai A, Qian T, Trenberth KE, Milliman JD (2009) Changes in continental freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004. J Climate 22:2773–2792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marsily G (1994) Hydrogeological nature reserves? future groundwater resources at risk. IAHS publication no 222. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Priscoli J, Wolf A (2009) Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Dolsak N, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2002) The drama of the commons. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dongoske KE, Yeatts M, Anyon R, Ferguson TJ (1997) Archaeological cultures and cultural affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American southwest. Am Antiq 62:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster S, Loucks DP (eds) (2006) Non-renewable groundwater resources: a guidebook on socially-sustainable management for water-policy makers IHP-VI. Series on groundwater no 10. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Garven G (1995) Continental-scale groundwater flow and geologic processes. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 23:89–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier C (2008) Oil, water, and climate: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J, Stanford JA, Dole-Oliver MJ, Ward JV (1994) Basic attribute of groundwater ecosystems and prospects for research. In: Gibert J, Danielpol D, Stanford J (eds) Groundwater ecology. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano M (2009) Global groundwater? issues and solutions. Anns Rev Environ Resourc 34:7.1–7.26

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennon R (2002) Water follies: groundwater pumping and the fate of America’s freshwaters. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton RD, Utton AE (1989) Transboundary groundwaters: the Bellagio draft treaty. Nat Res Jour 29:677

    Google Scholar 

  • International Groundwater Resources Assessment Centre (IGRAC) (2009) Transboundary aquifers of the world. http://www.igrac.net/publications/320. Accessed 23 August 2010

  • Jarvis T, Wolf A (2010) Managing water negotiations and conflicts in concept and in practice. In: Earle A, Jägerskog A, Öjendal J (eds) Transboundary water management: principles and practice. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolossov V, O’Loughlin J (1998) New borders for new world orders: territorialities at the fin-de-siecle. GeoJournal 44:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar MB (2007) Geological aspects of unitization in the petroleum fields of Louisiana: a brief overview. The Professional Geologist Nov–Dec: 30–32. http://dnr.louisiana.gov/assets/docs/TPG_Kumar-Articles.pdf Accessed 09 February 2012

  • Libecap GD (2005) The problem of water, essay prepared for national bureau of economic research. http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2006/0108_1300_0702.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2010

  • Little JB (2009) The Ogallala aquifer: saving a vital U.S. water source. Sci Amer Earth 3.0 19:32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone S, Franz T, Guiger N (1996) Managing ground-water resources using wellhead protection programs. Geoscience Canada 22:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale DJ (1999) Information power: strategy, geopolitics, and the fifth dimension. In: Gray CS, Sloan G (eds) Geopolitics, geography, and strategy. Frank Cass, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Gunn E, Jarvis WT (2009) Groundwater governance and the law of the hidden sea. Water Pol 11:742–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maimone M (2004) Defining and managing sustainable yield. Ground Water 42:809–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe WJ, Job CA, Simons JJ, Graves JS, Terada CJ (1997) History of the sole source aquifer program: a community-based approach for protecting aquifers used for drinking water supply. Groundwater Monit Rev Summer 1997:86

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey SC (2001) The law of international watercourses, non-navigational uses. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moench M (2004) Groundwater: the challenge of monitoring and management. In: Gleick P (ed) The world’s water 2004–2005. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Moench M (2007) When the well runs dry but livelihood continues: adaptive responses to groundwater depletion and strategies for mitigating the associated impacts. In: Giordano M, Villhoth KG (eds) The agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to development. CABI International, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden D (ed) (2007) Water for food, water for life. Earthscan/International Water Management Institute, London/Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevost R (2006) Is Thermopolis out of steam? Casper, WY.: the casper star-tribune, march. http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/article_68042562-9beb-50e1-93d7-5d6567b17a46.html. Accessed 27 June 2010

  • Pyne RDG (2005) Aquifer storage and recovery: a guide to groundwater recharge through wells, 2nd edn. ASR Systems, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakura Y, Tang C, Yoshioka R, Ishibashi H (2003) Intensive use of groundwater in some areas of China and Japan. In: Custodio E, Llamas R (eds) Intensive use of groundwater: challenges and opportunities. AA Balkema, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E (2004) Common-pool resource theory. In: Durant RF, Fiorino DJ, O’Leary R (eds) Environmental governance reconsidered: challenges, choices, and opportunities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E (2007) Community management of groundwater. In: Giordano M, Villhoth KG (eds) The agricultural groundwater revolution: opportunities and threats to development. CABI International, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah T (2009) Taming the anarchy: groundwater governance in south Asia. Resources for the Future Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek S, Gunay G, Elhatip H, Ekmekci M (2000) Environmental protection of geothermal waters and travertines at Pamukkale, Turkey. Geothermics 29:557–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Springer AE, Stevens LE (2009) Spheres of discharge of springs. Hydrogeol J 17:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford JA, Gibert J (1994) Conclusions and perspective. In: Gibert J, Danielpol D, Stanford J (eds) Groundwater ecology. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Theis CV (1940) The source of water derived from wells-essential factors controlling the response of an aquifer to development. Civ Eng 10:277–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson F (2005) Local conflict and water: addressing conflicts in water projects. Swedish water house. http://www.swedishwaterhouse.se/swh/resources/20050425162906Water_and_Local_Conflict.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2010

  • van Vugt M (2009) Triumph of the commons: helping the world to share. New Sci 2722:40–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford GD (2003) Out of the basin, into the hydrocommons. In: Utton Transboundary Resources Center (ed) Conference report and synthesis on interstate waters crossing boundaries for sustainable solutions, a multidisciplinary approach. University of New Mexico School of Law, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT, Giordano MA (2002) Atlas of international freshwater agreements. Early warning and assessment report series, RS. 02-4. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • World-wide Hydrogeological Mapping and Assessment Programme (WHYMAP) (2008) Groundwater resources of the world. http://www.whymap.org/cln_116/whymap/EN/Home/whymap__node.html?__nnn=true. Accessed 27 June 2010

  • Zekster IS, Everett LG (2004) Groundwater resources of the world and their use, IHP-VI, series on groundwater no 6. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geosciences, Institute for Water and Watersheds, Oregon State University, 210 Strand Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    William Todd Jarvis

Authors
  1. William Todd Jarvis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Todd Jarvis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for Humanity and Natu, 457-4 Motoyama, Kamigamo, Kita-ku, Kyoto, 603-8047, Japan

    Makoto Taniguchi

  2. Hokkaido University, Institute of Low Temperature Science, Kita-19, Nishi-8, Kita-ku 457-4, Sapporo, 060-0819, Japan

    Takayuki Shiraiwa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jarvis, W.T. (2012). Integrating Groundwater Boundary Matters into Catchment Management. In: Taniguchi, M., Shiraiwa, T. (eds) The Dilemma of Boundaries. Global Environmental Studies. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54035-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation