Skip to main content

Cost-Benefit, Risk and Trade-Off Analysis of Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulation of Biological Control Agents

Abstract

Several reasons have made registration of biological control agents (BCAs) in Europe a time-consuming and costly effort, resulting in these environmentally friendly products being kept off the market. To be cost effective, regulatory states must become cost-benefit states. To avoid over-regulation with all its negative consequences, government regulation should ask whether the benefits of regulation justify the costs of regulation. Such an analysis includes a cost-benefit-analysis, which is supported by a risk-trade-off-analysis. A survey among biocontrol companies indicated that average costs for registration are 1.9 million €. Benefits of regulation are put relative to costs for the different groups of BCAs. Trade-off effects of regulation on biocontrol companies, plant protection practice, consumer safety and the environment are described. Consequences resulting from the joint regulation of BCAs with chemical compounds and the organisation of registration in Europe are specified and proposals for overcoming problems are presented. Contradictions between the objectives of the European agriculture policy and the limited support of biological control are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrow (2004) Aventis products boost Bayer’s 2003 results. Agrow World Crop Protect News 445:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Alabouvette C, Cordier C (2011) Risks of microbial biocontrol agents and regulation: are they in balance? In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg G, Zachow C, Cardinale M, Müller H (2011) Bacterial ecology and human pathogenicity of plant-associated bacteria. In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq P, Bale JS (2011) Risks of invertebrate biological control agents – Harmonia axyridis as a case study. In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Easteal S (1981) The history of introductions of Bufo marinus (Amphibia: Anura); a natural experiment in evolution. Biol J Linnean Soc 16:93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers R-U (2011) Regulation of biological control agents and the EU Policy Support Action REBECA. In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (2010) EPPO Standards on Safe use of Biological Control - PM 6/3 - Version 2010. List of biological control agents widely used in the EPPO region. http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/biocontrol_web/bio_list.htm

  • EU (2009) Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides. Off J Eur Union L 309:71

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. Commission of the European Communities COM 2000–1. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2000/com2000_0001en01.pdf

  • Frost and Sullivan (2001) European biopesticides market. http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/report-toc.pag?ctxixpLink=FcmCtx3&searchQuery=European+biopesticide+market+2001&repid=3905-01-00-00-00&bdata=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5mcm9zdC5jb20vc3JjaC9jYXRhbG9nLXNlYXJjaC5kbz9xdWVyeVRleHQ9RXVyb3BlYW4rYmlvcGVzdGljaWRlK21hcmtldCsyMDAxJnBhZ2VTaXplPThAfkBTZWFyY2ggUmVzdWx0c0B%2BQDEyOTEwNDAxOTcxOTE%3D&ctxixpLabel=FcmCtx4

  • Graham JD, Wiener JB (1995) Risk versus risk – tradeoffs in protecting health and the environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen HMT, Hokkanen-Menzler I (2008) Deliverable 24: Cost, trade-off, and benefit analysis. REBECA-Regulation of biological control agents. Specific Support Action, Project no. SSPE-CT-2005-022709. http://www.rebeca-net.de/downloads/report/deliverable%2024.pdf

  • Lisansky SG, Coombs J (1994) Development in the market for biopesticides. In: Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pest and Diseases, Farnham, Surrey, UK, pp 1049–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M, Nelson J, Lipner V, Giordano S, Horowitz A, D’Amore M (1992) Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. BioScience 42:750–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnault-Roger C (2011) Risks of biocontrol agents containing compounds of botanical origin or semiochemicals. In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 216–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter W (2007) Pestizide am Limit II. Veränderungen von Höchstmengen für Pestizide in pflanzlichen Erzeugnissen in Deutschland 2004–2006. http://www.greenpeace.de/gpd/user_upload/themen/umweltgifte/greenpeace_pestizide_am_limit_2.pdf

  • Roy H, Brown P, Majerus M (2006) Harmonia axyridis: A successful biocontrol agent or an invasive threat?. In: Eilenberg J, Hokkanen HMT (eds) An ecological and societal a approach to biological control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 295–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser H, Hutwimmer S, Burgstaller W (2011) Metabolite toxicology of fungal biocontrol agents. In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 191–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch O, Strasser H, Hauschild R, Ehlers R-U (2011) Proposals for bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents. In: Ehlers R-U (ed) Regulation of biological control agents. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein CR (2002) Risk and reason - safety, law, and the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 342

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Blom J (2009) Microbiological insecticides against lepidopteran pests in greenhouse horticulture in Almeria, Spain. IOBC/wprs Bull 45:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Waibel H, Fleischer G, Becker H, Runge-Metzger A (1998) Kosten und Nutzen des chemischen Pflanzenschutzes in der deutschen Landwirtschaft aus gesamtwirtschaftlicher Sicht. Agrarökonomische Monographien und Sammelwerke. Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, Kiel

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf-Udo Ehlers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehlers, RU. (2011). Cost-Benefit, Risk and Trade-Off Analysis of Regulation. In: Ehlers, RU. (eds) Regulation of Biological Control Agents. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3664-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics