Abstract
Problems associated with mass expressions can be divided into the following general areas: (1) distinguishing a class of mass expressions, (2) describing the syntax of this class, (3) describing the formal semantics of this class, (4) explicating the ontology such a class of expressions presupposes, and (5) accounting for various epistemological issues involving our perception of the ontology. Permeating all these areas are questions of the role of pragmatics (construed broadly so as to encompass questions of how people typically use mass expressions to describe a state of affairs) in formal semantic descriptions. For example, if people normally use expression x in such-and-such circumstances (or normally take a use of x to imply y), should that have some reflex in the syntax, the semantics, the presupposed ontology, etc.? The “problems of mass expressions” therefore provides a rich area in which to formulate and test various logico-linguistic theories. In this article we indicate (what we take to be) the more important problems and puzzles, survey some suggested solutions, indicate what we think are outstanding difficulties with those approaches, and make a few not-well-defended suggestions of our own to these problems and puzzles. A bibliography of most work on mass expressions prior to 1978 can be found in Pelletier (1979b).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Allan, K.: 1977, ‘Classifiers’, Language 53,285–311.
Allan, K.: 1980, ‘Nouns and countability’, Language 56, 451–467.
Allan, K.: 1981, ‘Review of U. Weinreich On Semantics’, Language 57.941–948. (esp. 947).
Åqvist, L. and Guenthner, F.: 1978, ‘Fundamentals of a theory of verb aspect and events within the setting of an improved tense-logic’, in F. Guenthner and C. Rohrer (eds.), Studies in Formal Semantics (North Holland: Amsterdam), 167–199.
Bacon, John: 1973, ‘Do generic descriptions denote?’ Mind 82,331–347.
Bahm, A.: 1976, ‘Degrees and scales’ ITA Humanidades 12, 67–73.
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized quantifiers and natural language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
Bennett, Michael: 1977, ‘Mass nouns and mass terms in Montague grammar’ in S. Davis and M. Mithun Linguistics, Philosophy, and Montague Grammar (Austin: Univ. of Texas Press), 263–285.
Bunt, H. c.: 1976, ‘The formal semantics of mass terms’, Papers from the IIIrd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Helsinki.
Bunt, H. C.: 1978, ‘A formal semantic analysis of mass terms and amount terms’, in J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof (eds.), Amsterdam Papers in Formal Grammar, Vol. II.
Bunt, H. c.: 1979, ‘Ensembles and the formal semantic properties of mass terms’ in F. J. Pelletier (1979), 249–277.
Bunt, H. c.: 1980, ‘On the why, the how, and the whether of a count-mass distinction among adjectives’ in J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, (Mathematical Centre: Amsterdam), 51–77.
Bunt, H. C.: 1981, The Formal Semantics of Mass Terms, Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Bunt, H. C.: 1985, Mass Terms and Model Theoretic Semantics, (Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge).
Burge, Tyler: 1972, ‘Truth and mass terms’, Journal of Philosophy 69, 263–282.
Burge, Tyler: 1975, ‘Mass terms, count nouns, and change’, Synthese 31, 459–478. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 199-218. Page references to reprint.
Carlson, G.: 1977, ‘A unified analysis of the English bare plural’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–456.
Carlson, G.: 1982, ‘Generic terms and generic sentences’, Jour. Philosophical Logic 11, 163–182.
Cartwright, H. M. R.: 1965, ‘Heraclitus and the bath water’ Philosophical Review 74, 466–485.
Cartwright, H. M. R.: 1970, ‘Quantities’ Philosophical Review 79,25–42.
Cartwright, H. M. R.: 1975, ‘Amounts and measures of amounts’ Noûls 9,143–164. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 179-198. Page references to reprint.
Cheng, C-Y.: 1973, ‘Response to Moravcsik’, in Hintikka et al. 286–288.
Chierchia, G.: 1982a, ‘Bare plurals, mass nouns and nominalization’ in D. Flickinger, M. Macken, and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 243–255.
Chierchia, G.: 1982b, ‘Nominalization and Montague grammar. A semantics without types for natural language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5,303–354.
Chierchia, G.: 1983, ‘On plural and mass nominals and the structure of the world’ in Borowsky, T. and D. Finer (eds.), Univ. of Massachusetts Occasional Papers, VIII, Amherst: GLSA.
Clark, H. and E. Clark: 1979, ‘When nouns surface as verbs’ Language 55, 767–811.
Clarke, D. S.: 1970, ‘Mass terms as subjects’, Philosophical Studies 21, 25–29.
Cocchiarella, N.: 1976, ‘On the logic of natural kinds’, Philosophy of Science 43, 202–222.
Cocchiarella, N.: 1977, ‘Sortals, natural kinds, and re-identification’, Logique et Analyse, 439–474.
Cocchiarella, N.: 1978, ‘On the logic of nominalized predicates and its philosophical interpretations’ Erkenninis 13, 339–369.
Cook, K.: 1975, ‘On the usefulness of quantities’ Synthese 31, 443–457. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 121-135. Page references to reprint.
Davidson, D.: 1976, ‘Truth and meaning’, Synthese 17, 304–323.
Feldman, F.: 1973, ‘Sortal predicates’ Noûs 7,268–282.
Gabbay, D. and Moravcsik, J. M. E.: 1979, ‘Verbs, events and the flow of time’, in C. Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers (Niemeyer: Stuttgart), 59–84.
Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum, and I. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (Harvard UP: Cambridge, Mass.).
Geach, P.: 1962, Reference and Generality (Cornell UP: Ithaca).
Gleason, H. A.: 1965, Linguistics and English Grammar (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston), esp. 134–137.
Grandy, R.: 1973, ‘Reply to Moravcsik’ in Hintikka et al. (1973), 295–300.
Grandy, R.: 1975, ‘Stuff and things’, Synthese 31, 479–485. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 219-225. Page references to the reprint.
Hansen, C. D.: 1976, ‘Mass nouns and A white horse is not a horse’, Philosophy East and West 26, 189–209.
Hendry, H.: 1982, ‘Complete extensions of the calculus of individuals’ Noûs 16, 453–460.
Hestevold, H. S.: 1978, A Metaphysical Study of Aggregates and Continuous Wholes, Ph.D. dissertation, Brown Univ.
Hintikka, J., J. M. E. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.): 1973, Approaches to Natural Language (D. Reidel: Dordrecht
Hoeksema, J.: 1983, ‘Plurality and conjunction’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Model-theoretic Semantics (Foris: Dordrecht), pp. 63–83.
Hoepelman, J.: 1976, ‘Mass nouns and aspects, or: Why we can’t eat gingercake in an hour’, in J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhoff (eds.), Amsterdam Papers in Formal Grammar, Vol. I (Math. Centrum: Amsterdam).
Hoepelman, J.: 1978, ‘The treatment of activity verbs in a Montague-type grammar, a first approximation’ in F. Guenthner and C. Rohrer (eds.), Studies in Formal Semantics (North Holland: Amsterdam), 121–165.
Hoepelman, J. and C. Rohrer: 1980, ‘On the mass-count distinction and the French imparfait and passe simple’, in C. Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers (Niemeyer: Tübingen),85–112.
Kamp, J.: 1975, ‘Two theories about adjectives’, in E. Keenen (ed.), Formal Semantics of natural Language (Cambridge UP: London), 123–155.
Kaplan, D.: 1973, ‘Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice’, in Hintikka et al. (1973), 490–518.
Klooster, W.: 1972, The Structure Underlying Measure Phrase Sentences (D. Reidel: Dordrecht).
Laycock, H.: 1972, ‘Some questions of ontology’, Philosophical Review 81,3–42.
Laycock, H.: 1975, ‘Theories of matter’, Synthese 31, 411–442. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979),89-120. Page references to the reprint.
Leech, G. N.: 1969, Towards a Semantic Description of English (Longman: London).
Link, G.: 1981, ‘The logical analysis plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach’ in Bauerle, R., C. Schwartze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language (de Gruyter: Berlin), 302–323.
Malotki, Ekkehart: 1983, Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language, (Mouton Pub.: Berlin).
Massey, G. J.: 1976, ‘Tom, Dick, and Harry, and all the king’s men’, American Philosophical Quarterly 13, 89–107.
McCawley, J.: 1975, ‘Lexicography and the count-mass distinction’, Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 314–321.
McCawley, J.: 1981, Everything the Linguists Always Wanted to Know About Logic (Univ. Chicago Press: Chicago).
Mellama, G.: 1981, ‘On quantifiers and mass terms’, American Philosophical Quarterly 18, 165–170.
Montague, R., 1973, ‘Reply to Moravcsik’ in Hintikka et al. (1973), 289–294, Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 173-178, as ‘The proper treatment of mass terms in English’.
Montague, R.: 1973a, ‘The proper treatment of quantifiers in English’, in Hintikka et al. (1973),221–242.
Moravcsik, J. M. E.: 1973, ‘Mass terms in English’ in Hintikka et al. (1973), 263–285.
Mourelatos, A. P. D.: 1978, ‘Events, processes, and states’ Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415–434.
Mufwene, S. S.: 1980, ‘Number, countability and markedness in Lingala LI-/MA-noun class’, Linguistics 18, 1019–1052.
Mufwene, S. S.: 1981, ‘Non-individuation and the count mass distinction’, Chicago Linguistic Society Papers 20,221–238.
Mufwene, S. S.: 1983, ‘The proper name/common noun distinction’, paper presented at Winter Meeting of Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis.
Mufwene, S. S.: 1984, ‘The count mass distinction and the English lexicon’, Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on Lexical Semantics.
Nola, R.: 1980, ‘Paradigms lost, or, the world regained-An excursion into realism and idealism in science’, Synthese 45,317–350.
Noonan, H.: 1978, ‘Count nouns and mass nouns’, Analysis 38.
Parsons, T.: 1970, ‘An analysis of mass and amount terms’ Foundations of Language 6, 363–388. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 137-166, Page references to the reprint.
Parsons, T.: 1975, ‘Afterthoughts on mass terms’ Synthese 31, 517–521. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 167-171. Page references to the reprint.
Pelletier, F. J.: 1974, ‘On some proposals for the semantics of mass terms’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 3,87–108.
Pelletier, F. J.: 1975, ‘Non-singular reference: Some preliminaries’, Philosophia 5. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 1-14. Page references to the reprint.
Pelletier, F. J. (ed.): 1979, Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems (D. Reidel: Dordrecht).
Pelletier, F. J.: 1979a, ‘A bibliography of recent work on mass terms’ in Pelletier (1979), 295–298.
Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object (MIT Press: Cambridge).
Quine, W. V.: 1964, ‘Review of [Geach 1962]’, Philosophical Review 73, 100–105.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik: 1972, A Grammar of Contemporary English (Longman: London).
Reeve, C. D.: 1980, Mass, Quantity and Amount, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Roeper, P.: 1983, ‘Semantics for mass terms with quantifiers’, Noûs 17, 251–265.
Sampson, G.: 1975, Review of Hintikka et al. (1973) Foundations of Language 12. especially pp. 546–547 (review of Moravcsik 1973).
Scha, R.: 1980, ‘Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification’. in J. Grocnendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (cds.). Formal Methods in the Study, of Language. Vol. II, 483–512.
Schubert, L. K. and F. J. Pelletier: 1982, ‘From English to logic: Context-free computation of conventional logical translation’, American Journal of Computational Linguistics 8, 26–44.
Sharvy, R.: 1975, ‘The indeterminacy of mass predication’, in Pelletier (1979), 47–54.
Sharvy, R.: 1978, ‘Maybe English has no count nouns: Notes on Chinese semantics’, Studies in Language 2, 345–365.
Siegel, M.: 1977, ‘Measure adjectives in Montague grammar’, in Davis, S. and M. Mithun (eds.), Linguistics. Philosophy, and Montague Grammar (Univ. Texas Press: Austin). 223–262.
Simons, P.: 1981, ‘Plural reference and set theory’ in B. Smith (ed.), Parts and Moments (Philosophia: Munich), 199–260.
Smith, R.: 1978, ‘Mass terms, generic expressions, and Plato’s theory offorms’, Jour. History of Philosophy 16. 141–153.
Strawson, P.: 1977. ‘Tense and continuity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 199–220.
ter Meulen, A.: 1980, Substances, Quantities and Individuals, Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford University. Available through Indiana University Linguistics Club.
ter Meulen, A.: 1981, ‘An intensional logic for mass terms’, Philosophical Studies 40, 105–125.
Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy (Cornell UP: Ithaca), Chapter 4.
Ware, R. X.: 1975, ‘Some bits and pieces’ Synthese 31, 379–393. Reprinted in Pelletier (1979), 15-29. Page references to the reprint.
Whorf, B.: 1939, ‘The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language’ in J. Carrol (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality. Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorl (MIT Press: Cambridge). 1956. 134–159.
Works on Mass Expressions which have been drawn to our attention since this article was prepared (1984).
Bricker, P.: 1988, ‘Review of [Bunt, 1985]’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 53,653–656.
Heintz, J.: 1985, ‘Do lambs have fur?’ Paper read at Canadian Philosophical Association meetings, Montreal.
Laycock, H.: 1985, ‘Mass terms again’. Paper read at Canadian Philosophical Association meetings, Montreal.
Pólos, L.: 1985, ‘Mass nouns: A semantic representation’ (in Hungarian), Tertium non Datur 2.
Pólos, L.: 1987a, ‘Mass nouns, plurals, events’ (in Hungarian), Tertium non Datur 4.
Pólos, L.: 1987b, ‘Mass terms: A found key to Parmeuides’ (in Hungarian) Tertium non Datur, 4.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pelletier, F.J., Schubert, L.K. (1989). Mass Expressions. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 167. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1171-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1171-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7021-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1171-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive