Abstract
In my previous research I have tried to discover how processes of auditory “scene analysis” help the listener to recognize patterns by sorting out those features of the signal that are likely to have arisen from the same source. In this work, I have often found that the scene analysis process seemed to be obeying this rule: each bit of acoustic evidence (such as a particular tone) is to be allocated to one or another perceptual stream, but not to more than one at a time (e.g., Bregman, 1978; Bregman & Rudnicky, 1975). The rule can be called “the rule of disjoint allocation”. It can be defined with reference to the familiar “vase-faces” ambiguous figure of the Gestalt psychologists. When we are aware of the faces, the line that separates a face from the vase is seen as the boundary of the face. When the vase is seen, that same line “belongs” to the vase. The same piece of sensory evidence (the line) cannot be allocated to both the face and the vase at the same time. Gestalt psychology would refer to this principle as illustrating the “belongingness” of perceived properties. One can see this belongingness principle as the natural result of the process of allocating evidence to distinct environmental objects or events.
I want to thank Bruno Repp for reading an earlier version of this paper and making many valuable suggestions. Valter Ciocca made valusble suggestions that led to Figure 3, and Pierre Abdel Ahad’s ideas contributed to Figure 2. The preparation of this paper was supported bya Research Fellowship from the Killam Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck, J. (1975). The perception of surface color. Scientific American, 233 (2), 62–75.
Bregman, A.S. (1977). Perception and behavior as compositions of ideals. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 250–292.
Bregman, A.S. (1978). Auditory streaming: competition among alternative organizations. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 391–398.
Bregman, A.S. and Rudnicky, A. (1975). Auditory segregation: stream or streams? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1. 263–267.
Broadbent, D.E. and Ladefoged, P. (1957). On the fusion of sounds reaching different sense organs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 708–710.
Collins, S. (1985). Duplex perception with musical stimuli: A further investigation. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 172–177.
Crowder, R.G. (1982). A common basis for auditory sensory storage in perception and immediate memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 477–483.
Cutting, J.E. (1976). Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: Inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening. Psychological Review, 83, 114–140.
Darwin, C.J. (1981). Perceptual grouping of speech components differing in fundamental frequency and onset-time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 185–207.
Fitch, H.L., Halwes, T., Erickson, D.M., and Liberman, A.M. (1980). Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop-consonant manner. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 343–350.
Hafter, E.R. and Jeffress, L.A. (1968). Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 563–569.
Kanizsa, G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimulazione omogenea. Revista di Psicologia, 49, 7–30.
Liberman, A.M. (1982). On finding that speech is special. American Psychologist, 37, 148–167.
Mann, V.A., Madden, J., Russell, J.M., and Liberman, A.M. (1981). Further investigations into the influence of preceding liquids on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, S91. (Abstract).
Nusbaum, H.C., Schwab, E.C., and Sawusch, J.R. (1983). The role of “chirp” identification in duplex perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 323–332.
Pastore, R.E., Schmuckler, M.A., Rosenbaum, L., and Szczesiul, R. (1983). Duplex perception with musical stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 469–474.
Pisoni, D.B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 253–260.
Rand, T.C. (1974). Dichotic release from masking for speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 678–680(L).
Repp, B.H. (1984). Against a role of “chirp” identification in duplex perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 89–93.
Siegel, W. and Siegel, J.A. (1976). Categorical perception of tonal intervals: Musicians can’t tell sharp from flat. Research Bulletin No. 366, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.
Steiger, H. (1983). Influences of sequential organization processes on the use of binaural cues. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bregman, A.S. (1987). The Meaning of Duplex Perception: Sounds as Transparent Objects. In: Schouten, M.E.H. (eds) The Psychophysics of Speech Perception. NATO ASI Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3629-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8123-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3629-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive